I mean there is the small matter that going after Hillary, a private citizen that opposed him politically, is more than likely an illegal and impeachable offense. As POTUS you have a little bit of leeway as to the types of crimes you focus on, but not the targets.
The IT guy who failed to do what he was required to, and then used bleach bit to cover his tracks could have been prosecuted....had he not been given immunity. Also there are probably a lot of prosecutable people floating around from The Bush Administrations private email server run by the RNC that deliberally destroyed 22 million emails.
But the notion that anyone was going to prosecute a 70 year old grandma that couldn't make email work on a computer for orchestrating some crazy cartoon villenesque cyber conspiracy was always laughable.
I'm not trying to argue with you but...how do you start a thread by accident? Like how do you accidentally press the "Start New Thread" button?
Do you mean you posted it and didn't realize it was fake when you posted it? Again, not trying to be an ass, just don't understand what you mean.
Something definitely worthy of respect and something far too lacking around here.
Trump aide: No plan to pursue charges against Clinton - CNNPolitics.com
I posted that link in an earlier post of mine in this thread. You can read CNN's writeup of it at that link though. They might even have a video, not sure.
Yeah KellyAnn Conway, the person that managed his campaign and transition team is very unreliable. You're right.
So I saw this on Morning Joe today, and already found a link for it. Kelly Ann goes into detail about it while visiting Morning Joe as well.
BREAKING: Trump Will Not Pursue Clinton Investigations; She’s ‘Been Through Enough’ | Mediaite
So there goes one of his selling points.
He can't drop something he hasn't started. But she clearly said he doesn't wish to pursue it. That's pretty solid evidence. Could she be mistaken? Sure. Could Trump change his mind? Sure. But it's still pretty good evidence Trump isn't going to pursue it.Sorry, but that is not conclusive. She didn't say Trump was dropping it.
so you are saying we had to elect him to find out what he really will do. Hmmmm where have I heard something like that before, oh yeah, the ACA. Since that turned out ****ty, I guess we can expect a Trump presidency to be ****ty to. Thanks for the reminder.
Nope, not if they hold (or held) high positions in the DC swamp. Trump, IMHO, is making a wise decision to trade the expensive prosecuting of Hillary for some much needed demorat support among congress critters.
No...that's not what I'm saying. You elected him because of what he said he was going to do.
But now...before he's been sworn in...everyone and their mother, brother and cat are coming out with stuff about what he "won't" do. I'm saying to treat all those people as nothing more than speculators...some quite biased speculators...and wait until he's inaugurated.
Yeah KellyAnn Conway, the person that managed his campaign and transition team is very unreliable. You're right.
He can't drop something he hasn't started. But she clearly said he doesn't wish to pursue it. That's pretty solid evidence. Could she be mistaken? Sure. Could Trump change his mind? Sure. But it's still pretty good evidence Trump isn't going to pursue it.
Exactly what evidence are you waiting for? Canadian Free Press to report it? I know you like getting information from there.
How is his former campaign manager a "biased speculator"? you can believe what you want, but it is clear he is going soft on a lot of issues and now it seems pursuing Clinton is just yet another thing he is going soft on.
Why, where is there any reasoning to that statement?Good, it was a dumb rallying cry to begin with.
So I saw this on Morning Joe today, and already found a link for it. Kelly Ann goes into detail about it while visiting Morning Joe as well.
BREAKING: Trump Will Not Pursue Clinton Investigations; She’s ‘Been Through Enough’ | Mediaite
So there goes one of his selling points.
Why, where is there any reasoning to that statement?
Are you against prosecuting known criminals? Should we, based on that ideal... and equal protection under the laws, just open up the prisons, let everyone free?
AND, did it or did it not help him get elected? Dumb my ass, it worked AND I hope she is in an orange jump suit sometime soon... as soon as they can locate a jumpsuit with cankle openings big enough to fit.
So I saw this on Morning Joe today, and already found a link for it. Kelly Ann goes into detail about it while visiting Morning Joe as well.
BREAKING: Trump Will Not Pursue Clinton Investigations; She’s ‘Been Through Enough’ | Mediaite
So there goes one of his selling points.
very unreliable sources. she will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. criminials who commit high treason are prosecuted.
Don't bet on that.
Another one of those "sources"...talking to the biased media...and we are supposed to give this credibility? Yeah...right. :roll: I'll wait till I see Trump or one of his people...on camera...say it.
But hey...who knows? One thing for sure is that we won't know for sure until after Trump is sworn in.
So I saw this on Morning Joe today, and already found a link for it. Kelly Ann goes into detail about it while visiting Morning Joe as well.
BREAKING: Trump Will Not Pursue Clinton Investigations; She’s ‘Been Through Enough’ | Mediaite
So there goes one of his selling points.
The delusion of Trump supporters his hilarious :lamo
"Hillary by a land slide"The delusion of Trump supporters his hilarious :lamo
One of his only good ones.
She deserves to have a special prosecutor investigation followed by her day in court.
But Trump has bigger fish to fry than one greedy incompetent old lady
Goes to show your boy is the ultimate liar. Spin it!
So I saw this on Morning Joe today, and already found a link for it. Kelly Ann goes into detail about it while visiting Morning Joe as well.
BREAKING: Trump Will Not Pursue Clinton Investigations; She’s ‘Been Through Enough’ | Mediaite
So there goes one of his selling points.
After pay-to-play allegations, being put on a charity watchdog’s “watch list” last year, and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, it’s not surprising that donations to the Clinton Foundation have suffered a steep decline.
According to the group’s most recent tax filing, contributions dropped 37 percent to $108 million, which is down from $172 million in 2014.
~
Not only did contributions drop, but so did revenue the Clintons brought in from speeches. That income fell to $357,500 from $3.6 million in 2014.
Donations to Clinton Foundation Nosedive - Leah Barkoukis
Chairman of the House Oversight Committee Jason Chaffetz vowed to continue an ongoing investigation of pay-to-play allegations between the Clinton Foundation and State Department.
"It’s this huge, massive mess that has to be cleaned up. So we would be remiss if we just dismissed it and moved on," Chaffetz told Fox News in a recent interview. "We have a lot of things that we have to fix, so it never ever happens again."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?