• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump went 'ballistic' and 'scrambled' to figure out what to do next after having his Twitter account banned

This is EXACTLY and literally a quid pro quo.

"This for That". Are you seriously saying that he didn't say that the money would not be paid if the demanded action was not completed?
You are confusing Trump’s call with the Ukraine. Biden was tasked by the US govt and the western world to send an ultimatum and it was a LOAN.
Trump wanted investigations and told the President of the Ukraine to call his personal lawyer Rudy.
 
Their gig runs out on the 20th anyway.
All of Trump’s people are desperate to not be associated with him in the history books. They are unemployable now.
 
I got to this part and stopped.

Shokin was not investigating Hunter Biden.
There was no investigation to stop.

That seems to be the story that is being peddled.

Asking the Ukrainians to investigate the dismissal seemed to have caused a pretty strong reaction from the Democrat-Socialists.

I wonder why?

If this is true, what else must be true?
 
You are confusing Trump’s call with the Ukraine. Biden was tasked by the US govt and the western world to send an ultimatum and it was a LOAN.
Trump wanted investigations and told the President of the Ukraine to call his personal lawyer Rudy.

Trump did NOT link the two in a Quid Pro Quo as the rabidly partisan Democrat-Socialists and the rabidly partisan media did.

Biden, at least as he described it, linked the desired cash offered to the actions required. Cash for action- whether a loan or a cash payout, it was linked. This for that. Quid Pro Quo.

In point of fact, he said very directly, "If the prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money". He also said that his authority to demand the Quid Pro Quo came directly from Obama. We don't know if he was lying about this or not.

 
Trump did NOT link the two in a Quid Pro Quo as the rabidly partisan Democrat-Socialists and the rabidly partisan media did.

Biden, at least as he described it, linked the desired cash offered to the actions required. Cash for action- whether a loan or a cash payout, it was linked. This for that. Quid Pro Quo.

In point of fact, he said very directly, "If the prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money". He also said that his authority to demand the Quid Pro Quo came directly from Obama. We don't know if he was lying about this or not.


Wow this is the first time I have heard of this, we all should demand an investigation.
 
That seems to be the story that is being peddled.

Asking the Ukrainians to investigate the dismissal seemed to have caused a pretty strong reaction from the Democrat-Socialists.

I wonder why?

If this is true, what else must be true?

It was investigated they turned up nothing.

 
That seems to be the story that is being peddled.

Asking the Ukrainians to investigate the dismissal seemed to have caused a pretty strong reaction from the Democrat-Socialists.

I wonder why?

If this is true, what else must be true?
Try a conspiracy forum; they'll tell you.
 
Back
Top Bottom