- Joined
- Oct 21, 2015
- Messages
- 55,107
- Reaction score
- 11,210
- Location
- Kentucky
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Quoted for truth! Damn sick of political correctness and liberals going too far.
Going too far with what specifically?
How about everything that liberals want? They have no end game. Every time you give them one inch they want to take a parsec and then when you give them a parsec they want the entire universe. Then when you give them the entire universe, they search out more universes. If you want to get specific then pick a topic, any topic and explain where liberals are willing to stop with their own policies.
I am sorry but that particular dog whistle is not within normal human hearing range.
I see you didn't bother to list any liberal policies that liberals would be happy stopping because they got everything they wanted.
My previous response to you seems to fit here as an apt reply..... that particular dog whistle you are blowing is not within normal human hearing range.
Not with your liberal brain anyway.
One of your own allies here admits it
So the argument seems to be NOT if there are Trump voters who are right wing whack jobs - but how many of Trump supporters are right wing whack jobs.
Not with your liberal brain anyway.
Are you proud that trump swam in his toxic waste dump of oratory tonight? What is Miderste about about? How is that something Lincoln or Reagan would be proud of? Who would want to pass that along to their children and grandchildren ?
I don't even know what you are talking about. What toxic waste dump of oratory are you talking about? But, I get it, you would rather him be the butt of jokes at the WH Correspondence dinner because that pleases your biased partisanship more.
Of course you know what I'm talking about. The last president to miss the WHCD had a bullet in him and still called in. What a disgrace to the party of Lincoln trump is .
But what toxic waste dump of oratory are you talking about? I really don't know what you are talking about.
Pennsylvania
Who knows? I know I don't know. Having a goal with the constraint of no regime change given Kim a way out, and yet remain in power. Should he not be willing to give up his nukes, perhaps then the constraint will be lifted, and he will lose power.
Of all the scenarios, Kim losing power is probably one of the best ones (for both the world and the people of that nation), but the question then becomes how to accomplish that? I'd rather not have a military action and putting Seoul or the rest of South Korea at risk. That's a non-starter for me, and I don't get the impression from the administration that this is what they are after either.
I think you'd be challenged to find a single political movement that doesn't have its share of extremists, whack jobs as you deride them. And yes, that includes the left, the Democrat party, and every other one.
I don't think trump wants a war if that is what you are saying.
But in a few months or years kim will have a working that can reach th US with nuclear warheads.
That is a fact that cannot be ignored or postponed
I don't think trump wants a war if that is what you are saying.
But in a few months or years kim will have a working that can reach th US with nuclear warheads.
That is a fact that cannot be ignored or postponed
While there is some validity in that claim about movements of millions of people, the Trump campaign somehow managed to corner the market on a very high percentage of nut jobs right of center. And he continued to intentionally appeal to them day after day after day.
I see opinion. And that's fine.
Opinion backed up with facts from a reliable, reasonable source would be even stronger and more compelling.
I already mentioned the facts from a reliable source ............. the November election results. Nothing could be stronger or more compelling.
Think of it from the N. Korean perspective. The U.S. already has nuclear weapons that can reach it. We also taught N. Korea the lesson of Iraq -- a country without nuclear weapons is at risk of being invaded by the country that spends more on military than nearly all other countries combined. From their perspective, they are acting rationally.
While true, you cited the November election results, but not how that supports your claim, that Trump supporters are comprised of "a very high percentage of nut jobs right of center".
You've taken a leap, and have not cited the bridge for that leap, so it leaves it at the level of your opinion only.
Before I go through a long and involved presentation here - which I frankly suspect will be a huge waste of time - , can you provide for me one instance where such a presentation of evidence played any role in you admitting someone on the opposite side of the political divide was correct?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?