• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Told Michael Cohen To Lie About Trump Tower Moscow: Report

So the dossier proved to be right then? At least the parts of it the FBI could verify.

No it's never been proven correct in its entirety. It's either a collaborated document or it is not. Surly your not saying the FBI can use documents to accuse someone that are only part correct that they state is fully correct. You do know that many of the Top Brass of the FBI have been fired or demoted or left the FBI for wrong doing. And some are under investigation for various crimes.

And it has gone way beyond that since. After all pretty much everything the FBI has suspected Trump associates of has been demonstrated and several now have been convicted. This is far from a 'witch hunt'.

Sorry none have been convicted of collusion. All those convictions you claim have no relationship that Trump colluded with the Russians, or has there been a Russian named as cospiring with Trump to win the election nor what the Russians did to get Trump elected? Thus the main purpose of the Special counsel was to investigate Trump / Russia collusion which turns out to be a witch hunt.

a lot more on Trump than a few scant suggestions in the Steele Dossier, many of which have turned out to be accurate since then anyway.

The FBI used an unverified Dossier that the Russian provided to Steele that Crooked Hillary paid for to get a FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign. Fact.
 
No it's never been proven correct in its entirety. It's either a collaborated document or it is not. Surly your not saying the FBI can use documents to accuse someone that are only part correct that they state is fully correct. You do know that many of the Top Brass of the FBI have been fired or demoted or left the FBI for wrong doing. And some are under investigation for various crimes.



Sorry none have been convicted of collusion. All those convictions you claim have no relationship that Trump colluded with the Russians, or has there been a Russian named as cospiring with Trump to win the election nor what the Russians did to get Trump elected? Thus the main purpose of the Special counsel was to investigate Trump / Russia collusion which turns out to be a witch hunt.



The FBI used an unverified Dossier that the Russian provided to Steele that Crooked Hillary paid for to get a FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign. Fact.

Nope they verified the parts that were needed to get the warrant. The entire report doesn't need to be verified because it doesn't all apply to the investigation. In any case there are no doubt parts that turned out to be untrue. That's how investigations work, some leads turn out to be dead ends. The dossier had many leads, for example, but no pee tapes. Big deal, we've moved on from there.

And...it was not what started the case, they had tip-offs before - again a simple wiki search demonstrates that. Moreover a lot more has come out since then: some of the convictions and charges are related to tip-offs from the dossier; more from the wider investigation which seems to have exposed corruption in the campaign from top to bottom.

It might be comforting for those unprofessional right wing 'news' blogs to pretend the entire case hinges on the Steele dossier but nobody else is talking about it: it is a footnote, nothing more. Far more has happened since then and when the Mueller report comes out only those bitterly clinging to conspiracy theories about a giant govt plot to undermine Trump will still be talking about it.
 
Nope they verified the parts that were needed to get the warrant. The entire report doesn't need to be verified because it doesn't all apply to the investigation. In any case there are no doubt parts that turned out to be untrue. That's how investigations work, some leads turn out to be dead ends. The dossier had many leads, for example, but no pee tapes. Big deal, we've moved on from there.

And...it was not what started the case, they had tip-offs before - again a simple wiki search demonstrates that. Moreover a lot more has come out since then: some of the convictions and charges are related to tip-offs from the dossier; more from the wider investigation which seems to have exposed corruption in the campaign from top to bottom.

It might be comforting for those unprofessional right wing 'news' blogs to pretend the entire case hinges on the Steele dossier but nobody else is talking about it: it is a footnote, nothing more. Far more has happened since then and when the Mueller report comes out only those bitterly clinging to conspiracy theories about a giant govt plot to undermine Trump will still be talking about it.

Your comments are so bogus you're a waste of my time.
 
Back
Top Bottom