- Joined
- Apr 22, 2019
- Messages
- 47,036
- Reaction score
- 22,911
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
In fact, I'd be willing to bet he would actually nuke Tehran.
If he thought he'd benefit, I have almost no doubt.
In fact, I'd be willing to bet he would actually nuke Tehran.
Okay, I missed that in his OP. I see it in the subject line now.
He is threatening war crimes. He hasn't committed them.
Yet.
Like I said, it’s meaningless bluster.
Until he actually does something, getting worked up is counterproductive
So in other words meaningless bluster from an idiot, not a war crime.
That's on Moscow Mitch and the Republicans.
Under the Senate rules House Managers can call witnesses. The Chief as presiding officer would rule on this. MM would have to get the rules changed to negate this, or call a vote to override a ruling by the Chief MM doesn't approve of, ne c'est pas.
Pelosi will anyhow continue to run the show by her grandfather clock.
Like I said, it’s meaningless bluster.
Until he actually does something, getting worked up is counterproductive
Weird how words suddenly don’t matter when the president is a republican
Weird how actual actions have always mattered more than words, especially when dealing with a man who blusters hysterically approximately 99.9% of the time.
Weird how desperate people on the left have been to try and draw an equivalence between the US and Iran