• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump team seeks to control, block Mueller’s Russia investigation

beefheart

Ice Cream for Crow?
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
61,659
Reaction score
64,988
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
Oh my....Trump wants to know if he can pardon himself?


https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-lawyers-seek-to-undercut-muellers-russia-investigation/2017/07/20/232ebf2c-6d71-11e7-b9e2-2056e768a7e5_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_no-name%3Apage%2Fbreaking-news-bar&tid=a_breakingnews&utm_term=.5bac663472e2

 
Wonderful. News breaks that Mueller is probing the Trump criminal empire. Trump immediately becomes curious if he has the power to pardon himself.

What the hell has happened to this country?
 

 
Wonderful. News breaks that Mueller is probing the Trump criminal empire. Trump immediately becomes curious if he has the power to pardon himself.

What the hell has happened to this country?

Morons elected a complete POS as president...
 
Wonderful. News breaks that Mueller is probing the Trump criminal empire. Trump immediately becomes curious if he has the power to pardon himself.

What the hell has happened to this country?

Partisans in the base of both sides became so blinded by those who told them what they wanted to hear, they lost the ability to vet their own candidates?
 
Partisans in the base of both sides became so blinded by those who told them what they wanted to hear, they lost the ability to vet their own candidates?

One side screened out the demagogue telling the base what it wanted to hear. The other didn't.
 
One side screened out the demagogue telling the base what it wanted to hear. The other didn't.

.....no. Both sides chose awful candidates because they told themselves they were actually awesome candidates. Hillary beating Sanders is only slightly more impressive than had Trump beat out the The Rent Is Too Damn High guy.
 

Yes. I'm sorry your party gave its nomination to this flimflam man--the least experienced and likely worst equipped president in the history of the United States--but this is not a "both sides did it" situation.
 
Yes. I'm sorry your party gave its nomination to this flimflam man--the least experienced and likely worst equipped president in the history of the United States--but this is not a "both sides did it" situation.

1. I left the GOP when they decided to turn over the show to an abusive immoral carnival barker
2. That being said, we have Trump as POTUS because Dems managed to find a someone who was - somehow - an equally bad if not worse candidate for President than he.

You asked how we got here. That's how we got here. Both bases became immune to critical thinking, and both therefore put up awful candidates, believing them to be great.
 

Actually, we have Trump because the founding fathers thought it a good idea to have a system where the will of most wasn't synonymous with how the EC would go. The plurality of the country voted for a specific character who it thought was better. In the nearest political systems, this would have allowed that candidate to form a government. In ours, it doesn't mean jack.

The EC system literally led us to this possibility, not who Democrats chose.
 
Good point. No one on the DNC side has ever read the Constitution, so they couldn't have been expected to know the rules, and compete accordingly.

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
 
Good point. No one on the DNC side has ever read the Constitution, so they couldn't have been expected to know the rules, and compete accordingly.

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk

Knowing the rules doesn't mean you'll win. Boxers generally know the rules to boxing; technical knockouts still happen to the best of them. We have a system where a candidate can have the fewest votes, and still win as voting power fluctuates wildly between states. The Democrats could have beaten Trump by 10 million, and still lost the election.

So it's really not who the Democrats picked.
 
Because.......a truly innocent man would never inquire as to whether he could pardon himself....:roll:
 
POTUS's legal team spokesperson has resigned.

If he pardons himself, his family and aides, it is in itself an admission of guilt since a pardon for crimes against the US.
 

No nanny state! Personality responsibility! Also, all of the GOP's bad decisions are the fault of Democrats for not sufficiently intervening to same them from themselves.

Somehow the Dems' nominating process resulted in the GOP nominating Trump.
 
POTUS's legal team spokesperson has resigned.

If he pardons himself, his family and aides, it is in itself an admission of guilt since a pardon for crimes against the US.

He can't pardon himself.

Dictators in crappy countries can though...but not in the US.
 
Because.......a truly innocent man would never inquire as to whether he could pardon himself....:roll:

The anonymous source who cried wolf. :lamo
 
Knowing the rules doesn't mean you'll win.

That's right, it doesn't. You have to actually win. Hillary, it turns out, couldn't do that, not even against a candidate as toxic as Trump.

The Democrats could have beaten Trump by 10 million, and still lost the election.

Sure. And you can gain more yards than your opponent, yet still lose the football game. You can spend more time in control of the ball, and still lose the football match. You can lead the pack for the majority of the race, and yet lose if you aren't in front at the end. You can be taller, and yet lose at Jeopardy. You can speak better English, and yet lose the chess tournament. Irrelevant measurements are irrelevant measurements.

Democrats chose a candidate so awful, she managed to lose to Trump. I realize that's a hard to admit to being ones' self.


Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
 
Because.......a truly innocent man would never inquire as to whether he could pardon himself....:roll:

Apparently that "audit" doesn't prevent Mueller's team from seeing his tax returns and it's making him sweat. Weird, that.

But at least he's acting innocent. Innocent people are always looking for pardons.
 
Democrats chose a candidate so awful, she managed to lose to Trump. I realize that's a hard to admit to being ones' self.

Who says decades of voter suppression don't pay off in the end?
 
Apparently that "audit" doesn't prevent Mueller's team from seeing his tax returns and it's making his sweat. Weird, that.

But at least he's acting innocent. Innocent people are always looking for pardons.

And the scary thing is the steadily decreasing number of voters who still stand up for this guy. If you want to know how despots rose to power...do a psychological study on these nimrods.
 
Who says decades of voter suppression don't pay off in the end?
Still in the denial phase of mourning?

Sent from my XT1526 using Tapatalk
 
And the scary thing is the steadily decreasing number of voters who still stand up for this guy. If you want to know how despots rose to power...do a psychological study on these nimrods.

Well, in unrelated news, I heard a funny joke the other day.


Zing!
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…