• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump team failed to follow NSC’s pandemic playbook

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
111,656
Reaction score
101,902
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Trump team failed to follow NSC’s pandemic playbook

The 69-page document, finished in 2016, provided a step by step list of priorities – which were then ignored by the Trump administration.


Trump ignored a prepared pandemic defense manual. Now we pay the price.


Is anyone here honestly surprised that the Trump administration ignored a pandemic manual prepared by the Obama administration which could have averted/attenuated our supply catastrophe?

A rhetorical question.
 
Trump demands adulation and personal reassurance. If the playbook didn’t contribute to those ends then it never stood a chance of being followed.
 

Plans are the first casualty of war, or epidemics.
 

What makes the NSC more of an authority than, oh...the CDC or HHS
 
Plans are the first casualty of war, or epidemics.

That would imply they even bothered to try the plan, which was in place to help avoid that very situation.
 
What makes the NSC more of an authority than, oh...the CDC or HHS

You clearly did not read the link or even the quotes in the OP. Dismissed.
 
Trump demands adulation and personal reassurance. If the playbook didn’t contribute to those ends then it never stood a chance of being followed.

Trump is more in worried with who he can blame at this point in time.
 
Plans are the first casualty of war, or epidemics.

No Sir, the truth is.... :roll:

Lack of a plan is the biggest factor in LOSING a war....

General Eisenhower put it well- he thought plans rarely were followed closely but the exercise did create a staff experienced and flexible. The various plans could be gleaned for appropriate parts to cobble together a plan meeting the new conditions. Time after time in the race across France, planned operations were cancelled because ground forces were passed the airborne drop zones. But the planning exercises did help when the German resistance stiffened.

Now the old playbook does have relevant parts, does set-up a stockpile, a line of communication and flow paths. What it can never do is force the leadership to use the plan.

That was the problem, a twit in chief who downplayed the virus as it spread... so more like a lack of mature responsible leadership is the biggest roadblock to this plan... eace
 
Their singular focus was just this type of thing?

Wrong.

The NSC is focused on much more than "this type of thing". Obama had 450 people in his NSC. They were not singularly focused on this type of thing.
 
You clearly did not read the link or even the quotes in the OP. Dismissed.

I read the quote in the OP. I didn't see anything there that answers my question.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…