• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump says troops “going in” to Chicago after judge rules use of National Guard illegal

Really I thought it measured a crime committed. Do you not think there's a such thing as a victimless crime?
All crimes involve a victim. Even victimless crimes when the perpetrator and victim are the same person. Also, Trump was talking about violent crimes

Yes it's about sedition.
<LMAO!>

If Trump cared about sedition, he wouldn't have pardoned seditious conspirators.
 
All crimes involve a victim. Even victimless crimes when the perpetrator and victim are the same person. Also, Trump was talking about violent crimes


<LMAO!>

If Trump cared about sedition, he wouldn't have pardoned seditious conspirators.
He didn't pardon any seditious conspirators departed people wrongfully convicted of that.
 
There are no treasonous judges. They are ruling on the laws and precedents which is doing their job. If only Trump should do his and not keep violating his oath of office. He is the one committing treason.
Well, there's always the rationale that anything Trump does shouldn't be put to legal scrutiny and if it does, then rulings against him are "treason" or "activist judges" etc. Who would have thought that 50 years after Nixon you'd have people defending his nonsensical idea that anything the president does is legal.
 
All crimes involve a victim. Even victimless crimes when the perpetrator and victim are the same person. Also, Trump was talking about violent crimes


<LMAO!>

If Trump cared about sedition, he wouldn't have pardoned seditious conspirators.
The same applies to his "law and order" schtick since he pardoned people who assaulted police officers. Someone throwing a sandwich at a police officer got the DOJ talking about felony charges. It's clear this administration is a "one law for us, and another law for them".
 
There are no treasonous judges. They are ruling on the laws and precedents which is doing their job. If only Trump should do his and not keep violating his oath of office. He is the one committing treason.
Yeah, the convicted felon isn't the criminal. It's the judges upholding the law who are.
 
The fact they were pardoned.
Seems you don't know a pardon is an act of forgiveness, it does not absolve guilt or establish innocence. The record of a person receiving a pardon still reflects their conviction.

This means you have no evidence to support your belief.
 
Seems you don't know a pardon is an act of forgiveness,
No it's a pardon.
it does not absolve guilt or establish innocence. The record of a person receiving a pardon still reflects their conviction.
Wrongful as it may be.
This means you have no evidence to support your belief.
Except the pardon and I reject your claim that it was forgiveness. Trump didn't forgive them because there was nothing to forgive it was a middle finger to the ass clowns that acted like it was a bigger deal than it was.

It was an act of defiance.
 

Prime example of posting opinions that aren’t supported by any facts. You are entirely wrong about what presidential pardons are.
 
You really have no idea what you're babbling about.


A pardon is an expression of the President’s forgiveness and can be granted in recognition of the applicant’s acceptance of responsibility for the crime and established good conduct for a significant period of time after conviction or completion of sentence. It does not signify innocence.
 
You really have no idea what you're babbling about.
Because you're wrong?
Yeah I didn't think Trump thought they needed forgiveness. I think he was doing it specifically piss off Democrats. It worked. Just totally I did all that crap they wasted their entire 4 years on haha.

The reason why you feel like it's a middle figure right in your face it's because it was.
 
In case you missed it, I proved I wasn't wrong.

And it doesn't matter why he thought he was doing it. It's still just an act of forgiveness and not an act of establishing innocence.
 
It doesn't matter why he thought he was doing it. It's still just an act of forgiveness and not an act of issuing innocence.
Nope not in this case it was an act of defiance. He said he was releasing hostages. If you need lip service so he can release the hostages have your but it's only that way on paper not in any meaningful way.
 

Trump did it because he is a criminal and likes other criminals as long as they support him. It was a cynically political move to excite his cult followers and it apparently has worked as evidenced by the defense of it posted here.
 
Nope not in this case it was an act of defiance. He said he was releasing hostages. If you need lip service so he can release the hostages have your but it's only that way on paper not in any meaningful way.
<laughing>

A president lacks the ability to alter such definitions. The people he pardoned still have their convictions on record because a pardon is an act of forgiveness. Nothing more. I even posted the Department of Justice teaching you that. In cases were convicted criminals are actually found to be innocent, their convictions are overturned and they are acquitted of the related charges against them.

Savvy?

Their records are clean. Not so much for the J6 rioters who were convicted.
 
<laughing>

A president lacks the ability to alter definitions.
So he was freaking dead before something someone else accused them of.
Cope
Their records are clean. Not so much for the J6 rioters who were convicted.
Yes dictators leave scars.
 
So he was freaking dead before something someone else accused them of.

Cope

Yes dictators leave scars.

Trump is sure leaving a big scar on our way of government. It’s an ugly one.
 
Mostly suspending the ability of dictators to cheat by deporting their voting base.


Illegals don’t vote. No evidence that they ever have or ever impacted any election results. So deportations will have zero impact on how many votes any candidates receive. But it is Trump in power now, so who is the dictator?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…