• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Said to Have Reacted Approvingly to Jan. 6 Chants About Hanging Pence

MTAtech

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
36,634
Reaction score
35,656
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal

Trump Said to Have Reacted Approvingly to Jan. 6 Chants About Hanging

Shortly after hundreds of rioters at the Capitol started chanting “Hang Mike Pence!” on Jan. 6, 2021, the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, left the dining room off the Oval Office, walked into his own office and told colleagues that President Donald J. Trump was complaining that the vice president was being whisked to safety.
Mr. Meadows, according to an account provided to the House committee investigating Jan. 6, then told the colleagues that Mr. Trump had said something to the effect of, maybe Mr. Pence should be hung.
=====


So, the former president was ok with a violent mob hanging the sitting Vice President of the United States because that VP would not buy into a scheme to overturn an election that they both lost.

I don’t know how anyone can conclude otherwise that Trump is a self-serving traitor to the constitution that he swore an oath to uphold.
 
According to what account? Something to the effect of?

What. Garbage.
 

Trump Said to Have Reacted Approvingly to Jan. 6 Chants About Hanging

Shortly after hundreds of rioters at the Capitol started chanting “Hang Mike Pence!” on Jan. 6, 2021, the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, left the dining room off the Oval Office, walked into his own office and told colleagues that President Donald J. Trump was complaining that the vice president was being whisked to safety.
Mr. Meadows, according to an account provided to the House committee investigating Jan. 6, then told the colleagues that Mr. Trump had said something to the effect of, maybe Mr. Pence should be hung.
=====


So, the former president was ok with a violent mob hanging the sitting Vice President of the United States because that VP would not buy into a scheme to overturn an election that they both lost.

I don’t know how anyone can conclude otherwise that Trump is a self-serving traitor to the constitution that he swore an oath to uphold.
I'm so glad the article is behind a subscription requirement. Saved me from wasting my time.
 
I'm so glad the article is behind a subscription requirement. Saved me from wasting my time.

So the fact that you found out it was behind a paywall tells me that you don't reeeeeeeeeally mind what you consider a time-waster, considering you clicked the link to read it, but was unable to.

You just like to complain.

Got it.
 

Trump Said to Have Reacted Approvingly to Jan. 6 Chants About Hanging

Shortly after hundreds of rioters at the Capitol started chanting “Hang Mike Pence!” on Jan. 6, 2021, the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, left the dining room off the Oval Office, walked into his own office and told colleagues that President Donald J. Trump was complaining that the vice president was being whisked to safety.
Mr. Meadows, according to an account provided to the House committee investigating Jan. 6, then told the colleagues that Mr. Trump had said something to the effect of, maybe Mr. Pence should be hung.
=====


So, the former president was ok with a violent mob hanging the sitting Vice President of the United States because that VP would not buy into a scheme to overturn an election that they both lost.

I don’t know how anyone can conclude otherwise that Trump is a self-serving traitor to the constitution that he swore an oath to uphold.

Well, yeah -
  • "2:23 p.m.: Rioters attempt to breach the police line formed by barricades of bicycle racks. As a police lieutenant sprays the crowd with a chemical substance, rioter Julian Elie Khater raises his arm above the mob and sprays a chemical substance toward United States Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick, who dies the following day from a stroke.[115][116]

  • 2:24 p.m.: President Trump tweets,
    "Mike Pence didn't have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands the truth!"[85]"
 
I'm so glad the article is behind a subscription requirement. Saved me from wasting my time.
Never fear! waste away.

"Shortly after hundreds of rioters at the Capitol started chanting “Hang Mike Pence!” on Jan. 6, 2021, the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, left the dining room off the Oval Office, walked into his own office and told colleagues that President Donald J. Trump was complaining that the vice president was being whisked to safety.
Mr. Meadows, according to an account provided to the House committee investigating Jan. 6, then told the colleagues that Mr. Trump had said something to the effect of, maybe Mr. Pence should be hung.
It is not clear what tone Mr. Trump was said to have used. But the reported remark was further evidence of how extreme the rupture between the president and his vice president had become, and of how Mr. Trump not only failed to take action to call off the rioters but appeared to identify with their sentiments about Mr. Pence — whom he had unsuccessfully pressured to block certification of the Electoral College results that day — as a reflection of his own frustration at being unable to reverse his loss.
The account of Mr. Trump’s comment was initially provided to the House committee by at least one witness, according to two people briefed on their work, as the panel develops a timeline of what the president was doing during the riot.

Another witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, a former aide to Mr. Meadows who was present in his office when he recounted Mr. Trump’s remarks, was asked by the committee about the account and confirmed it, according to the people familiar with the panel’s work. It was not immediately clear how much detailed information Ms. Hutchinson provided. She has cooperated with the committee in three separate interviews after receiving a subpoena.
A lawyer for Mr. Meadows said he has “every reason to believe” that the account of what Mr. Meadows said “is untrue.”
Taylor Budowich, a spokesman for Mr. Trump, criticized the committee’s work. “This partisan committee’s vague ‘leaks,’ anonymous testimony and willingness to alter evidence proves it’s just an extension of the Democrat smear campaign that has been exposed time and time again for being fabricated and dishonest,” he said. “Americans are tired of the Democrat lies and the charades, but, sadly, it’s the only thing they have to offer.”
Mr. Budowich did not address the substance of the information provided to the committee.
A lawyer for Ms. Hutchinson did not respond to a message seeking comment. A spokesman for the committee declined to comment.
Mr. Pence resisted weeks of pressure from Mr. Trump and some of his allies to use his ceremonial role in overseeing Congress’s certification of the electoral votes on Jan. 6 to block or delay Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s victory. Despite being told by Mr. Pence and his advisers that they did not believe that the vice president had that power, Mr. Trump continued to apply pressure, privately and publicly, through that morning.

Mr. Trump denounced Mr. Pence’s unwillingness to go along with the effort during his rally at the Ellipse just before the Electoral College certification began in the Capitol.
“We want to be so respectful of everybody,” Mr. Trump said in a slashing speech in which he attacked various people and institutions for not cooperating with his desires. “And we are going to have to fight much harder. And Mike Pence is going to have to come through for us, and if he doesn’t, that will be a sad day for our country. Because you’re sworn to uphold our Constitution.”
A short time later, Mr. Trump’s supporters marched up to the Capitol on his encouragement. Some chanted “Hang Mike Pence!” as a gallows was set up outside the Capitol building. Mr. Pence, who had arrived earlier at the Capitol, was taken to safety in an underground garage as the top congressional leadership of both parties was evacuated.
Mr. Trump, watching television throughout the riot, spoke approvingly of those chants as he discussed them with Mr. Meadows and possibly other aides, according to the testimony that the committee has heard.
The panel is trying to develop a report portraying the events as part of Mr. Trump’s quest to stay in office, including how he stoked anger at his loss among his supporters and redirected it against Mr. Pence and members of Congress during what is typically a routine certification process.
The committee has also gathered testimony that Mr. Meadows used the fireplace in his office to burn documents, according to two people briefed on the panel’s questions. The committee has asked witnesses about how Mr. Meadows handled documents and records after the election."
 
So the fact that you found out it was behind a paywall tells me that you don't reeeeeeeeeally mind what you consider a time-waster, considering you clicked the link to read it, but was unable to.

You just like to complain.

Got it.
No, I figured out by the snippets posted in the OP that it would be a waste of my time reading the full article. Of course experience has taught me that many times the one supplying the article hasn't bothered to read it themselves or didn't understand what they read. That info is always worth a good laugh.
 
Never fear! waste away.

"Shortly after hundreds of rioters at the Capitol started chanting “Hang Mike Pence!” on Jan. 6, 2021, the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, left the dining room off the Oval Office, walked into his own office and told colleagues that President Donald J. Trump was complaining that the vice president was being whisked to safety.
Mr. Meadows, according to an account provided to the House committee investigating Jan. 6, then told the colleagues that Mr. Trump had said something to the effect of, maybe Mr. Pence should be hung.
It is not clear what tone Mr. Trump was said to have used. But the reported remark was further evidence of how extreme the rupture between the president and his vice president had become, and of how Mr. Trump not only failed to take action to call off the rioters but appeared to identify with their sentiments about Mr. Pence — whom he had unsuccessfully pressured to block certification of the Electoral College results that day — as a reflection of his own frustration at being unable to reverse his loss.
The account of Mr. Trump’s comment was initially provided to the House committee by at least one witness, according to two people briefed on their work, as the panel develops a timeline of what the president was doing during the riot.

Another witness, Cassidy Hutchinson, a former aide to Mr. Meadows who was present in his office when he recounted Mr. Trump’s remarks, was asked by the committee about the account and confirmed it, according to the people familiar with the panel’s work. It was not immediately clear how much detailed information Ms. Hutchinson provided. She has cooperated with the committee in three separate interviews after receiving a subpoena.
A lawyer for Mr. Meadows said he has “every reason to believe” that the account of what Mr. Meadows said “is untrue.”
Taylor Budowich, a spokesman for Mr. Trump, criticized the committee’s work. “This partisan committee’s vague ‘leaks,’ anonymous testimony and willingness to alter evidence proves it’s just an extension of the Democrat smear campaign that has been exposed time and time again for being fabricated and dishonest,” he said. “Americans are tired of the Democrat lies and the charades, but, sadly, it’s the only thing they have to offer.”
Mr. Budowich did not address the substance of the information provided to the committee.
A lawyer for Ms. Hutchinson did not respond to a message seeking comment. A spokesman for the committee declined to comment.
Mr. Pence resisted weeks of pressure from Mr. Trump and some of his allies to use his ceremonial role in overseeing Congress’s certification of the electoral votes on Jan. 6 to block or delay Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s victory. Despite being told by Mr. Pence and his advisers that they did not believe that the vice president had that power, Mr. Trump continued to apply pressure, privately and publicly, through that morning.

Mr. Trump denounced Mr. Pence’s unwillingness to go along with the effort during his rally at the Ellipse just before the Electoral College certification began in the Capitol.
“We want to be so respectful of everybody,” Mr. Trump said in a slashing speech in which he attacked various people and institutions for not cooperating with his desires. “And we are going to have to fight much harder. And Mike Pence is going to have to come through for us, and if he doesn’t, that will be a sad day for our country. Because you’re sworn to uphold our Constitution.”
A short time later, Mr. Trump’s supporters marched up to the Capitol on his encouragement. Some chanted “Hang Mike Pence!” as a gallows was set up outside the Capitol building. Mr. Pence, who had arrived earlier at the Capitol, was taken to safety in an underground garage as the top congressional leadership of both parties was evacuated.
Mr. Trump, watching television throughout the riot, spoke approvingly of those chants as he discussed them with Mr. Meadows and possibly other aides, according to the testimony that the committee has heard.
The panel is trying to develop a report portraying the events as part of Mr. Trump’s quest to stay in office, including how he stoked anger at his loss among his supporters and redirected it against Mr. Pence and members of Congress during what is typically a routine certification process.
The committee has also gathered testimony that Mr. Meadows used the fireplace in his office to burn documents, according to two people briefed on the panel’s questions. The committee has asked witnesses about how Mr. Meadows handled documents and records after the election."
So someone said someone said something and I'm expected to believe them? Can I interest you in a fake Russian collusion dossier regarding Hillary Clinton? :ROFLMAO:
 
I'm so glad the article is behind a subscription requirement. Saved me from wasting my time.

Ah yes, the trump dead ender’s lament. “Don’t confuse me with facts”.

What is your excuse going to be when the report turns out to be true?

And why are you still cheering for a traitor who tried to overthrow the US government.
 
Ah yes, the trump dead ender’s lament. “Don’t confuse me with facts”.

What is your excuse going to be when the report turns out to be true?

And why are you still cheering for a traitor who tried to overthrow the US government?
Fixed it for you.

When it turns out to be true? You mean you don't know if it is?
 
I'm so glad the article is behind a subscription requirement. Saved me from wasting my time.
This is right up there with Trump verbally attacking dead soldiers.
 
the one supplying the article hasn't bothered to read it themselves or didn't understand what they read.
Um, but you didn't do that, nor could you have, without reading the article......which you did not do.

How many other things are you not going to do and then fantasize about doing something?
 
According to what account? Something to the effect of?

What. Garbage.
According to Meadow’s account.
Now, you may return to your cognitive disonance.
 
So someone said someone said something and I'm expected to believe them?
Schultz+I+know+nothing.jpg
 
So someone said someone said something and I'm expected to believe them? Can I interest you in a fake Russian collusion dossier regarding Hillary Clinton? :ROFLMAO:
You don’t believe the former Chief of Staff testifying under oath? Seems like you dismiss any evidence that you don’t like.
 
A person who attempted a coup to overthrow our democratic system should not be allowed to use it to run for office in future elections.
 
You don’t believe the former Chief of Staff testifying under oath? Seems like you dismiss any evidence that you don’t like.
I saw no direct quotes from Mark Meadow. Did you?

Eta: Although I did read this: A lawyer for Mr. Meadows said he has “every reason to believe” that the account of what Mr. Meadows said “is untrue.”
 
According to what account? Something to the effect of?

What. Garbage.
Its just a teaser for the open hearings of next month.

BTW, the NYT is one of the world's great newspapers. They run a journalistic process the involves credible sources that are corroborated by other credible sources that meet the approval of the editor. If it is in the Times, its likely (not absolutely or fully, but substantially) true. That said, I appreciate that is likely foreign to you.
 
No, I figured out by the snippets posted in the OP that it would be a waste of my time reading the full article. Of course experience has taught me that many times the one supplying the article hasn't bothered to read it themselves or didn't understand what they read. That info is always worth a good laugh.

But that's not what you said. You complained that it was behind a paywall, so you didn't read it. In fact, your exact words were:

I'm so glad the article is behind a subscription requirement. Saved me from wasting my time.

So you admit that you would have, in your own words, wasted your time had it not been behind a paywall.

Gotcha.
 
But that's not what you said. You complained that it was behind a paywall, so you didn't read it. In fact, your exact words were:



So you admit that you would have, in your own words, wasted your time had it not been behind a paywall.

Gotcha.
*sigh* Enjoy your day.
 
Back
Top Bottom