- Joined
- Dec 29, 2020
- Messages
- 15,183
- Reaction score
- 15,277
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Liberal
YES, it was the FBI who attacked teh Capital.
Assholes.
There is evidence that what they are saying is true.On Candace Owens radio show, Donald agreed with Owens when she stated that Jan. 6th May have been a false flag operation, as stated previously by Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan. I'm wondering if Donald has a hat or bingo ball machine that he pulls his "thoughts" of the day from.
Trump Switches Gears Again, Suggests Jan. 6 Was False Flag Op
First they were “patriots,” then “low class” people, then “great people.” Now Trump thinks they may have been the FBI.www.thedailybeast.com
How is this guy different than all the others arrested so far?For those who are unaware of the evidence...the media won't tell you about it...here: https://www.publishedreporter.com/2...l-the-mysterious-ray-epps-remains-unindicted/
Jan. 6th would not of occured if Donald had conceded. It's always been Donald's way to claim fraud when he loses at anything. When he didn't get an Emmy for his reality TV show, he claimed the Emmy's were rigged. That's just how Donald handles his failures....... By blaming others.and maybe Trump was behind the events of 1/6.
Maybe and what if does not cut it for me.
Trump set the wheels in motion for the failed insurrection months prior. It played out step by step in front us. We all expected something to happen that day.
Every insurrectionists arrested are known, dyed in the wool MAGA'ites. But naturally I expect you to hop on any and every conspiracy theory laden donkey and ride it into town.There is evidence that what they are saying is true.
Too bad Congress is too busy using 1/6 for political purposes and are not interested in knowing the truth about what happened that day. It's clear the DOJ/FBI isn't interested in the issue. (After all, why would they investigate themselves?)
For those who are unaware of the evidence...the media won't tell you about it...here: https://www.publishedreporter.com/2...l-the-mysterious-ray-epps-remains-unindicted/
Quote the “evidence” in your linked article.There is evidence that what they are saying is true.
Too bad Congress is too busy using 1/6 for political purposes and are not interested in knowing the truth about what happened that day. It's clear the DOJ/FBI isn't interested in the issue. (After all, why would they investigate themselves?)
For those who are unaware of the evidence...the media won't tell you about it...here: https://www.publishedreporter.com/2...l-the-mysterious-ray-epps-remains-unindicted/
so ............ you are grasping for straws and other nonsensical comments.There is evidence that what they are saying is true.
Too bad Congress is too busy using 1/6 for political purposes and are not interested in knowing the truth about what happened that day. It's clear the DOJ/FBI isn't interested in the issue. (After all, why would they investigate themselves?)
For those who are unaware of the evidence...the media won't tell you about it...here: https://www.publishedreporter.com/2...l-the-mysterious-ray-epps-remains-unindicted/
What a ridiculous joke.There is evidence that what they are saying is true.
Too bad Congress is too busy using 1/6 for political purposes and are not interested in knowing the truth about what happened that day. It's clear the DOJ/FBI isn't interested in the issue. (After all, why would they investigate themselves?)
For those who are unaware of the evidence...the media won't tell you about it...here: https://www.publishedreporter.com/2...l-the-mysterious-ray-epps-remains-unindicted/
There is evidence that what they are saying is true.
Even IF I accept the allegation that Ray Epp 'essentially provoked' them, how does that supposedly make 1/6 a false flag event?
"... an Arizona man who some are alleging was a possible federal agent clandestinely involved in essentially provoking supporters of former President T**** into rioting at the U.S. Capitol building on January 6 in an attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election."
And there is no particular reason why you should accept that allegation.
He hasn't spent almost 300 days in jail.How is this guy different than all the others arrested so far?
Read it for yourself.Quote the “evidence” in your linked article.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?