• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump: Mueller “Rogue” in Manafort Prosecution

The Obama Swamp LIED about Papadopolous' "Russian connections" that THEY SET UP, and then used that to SPY ON THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN...this will not go UNPUNISHED.
 
Trump is the rogue, here.
 
Please specify the "LIES" the Grand Buffoon refers to..oh WAIT..he left that OUT of his filing, didn't he?

What a shocker.

Manafort had NOTHING for the Witch Hunt to "get Trump on" is OBVIOUSLY what is up here.

Really going after that "Russian Collusion thingy" isn't he?


View attachment 67245007


View attachment 67245008

Except that they have found that Manafort visited Julian Assange the month he took the Campaign Manager's job in 2016. Whoops.

Now we have some insight into why there is a sealed Indictment waiting for Assange.
 
Except that they have found that Manafort visited Julian Assange the month he took the Campaign Manager's job in 2016. Whoops.

Now we have some insight into why there is a sealed Indictment waiting for Assange.

Assange has been in US crosshairs ever since he published the classified documents given to him by Obama's favorite traitor, Bradley/Chelsea Manning.
 
Except that they have found that Manafort visited Julian Assange the month he took the Campaign Manager's job in 2016. Whoops.

Now we have some insight into why there is a sealed Indictment waiting for Assange.

So? Opposition research is "LEGAL", remember?

Did Manafort pay $MILLIONS to contact Kremolin-linked Russians for dirt to influence the election?

Or setup a meeting with the Hillary Campaign and a Fusdion GPS, Kremlin-linked client, to play "gotcha" later?

And Assange has repeatedly said it was a DNC INSIDER who leaked him the damning emails that exposed their corruption.


Hillary's emails have NEVER BEEN FOUND...you know...the ones SHE HAD DESTROYED AFTER THEY WERE SUBPOENAED by a FEDERAL COURT?


What LIES did the Grand Buffoon list?


Oh...he's still CREATING THEM, no doubt...
 
Please specify the "LIES" the Grand Buffoon refers to..oh WAIT..he left that OUT of his filing, didn't he?

What a shocker.

Manafort had NOTHING for the Witch Hunt to "get Trump on" is OBVIOUSLY what is up here.

Really going after that "Russian Collusion thingy" isn't he?


View attachment 67245007


View attachment 67245008

This is really, really hard for you and that's fun to watch.
 
Assange has been in US crosshairs ever since he published the classified documents given to him by Obama's favorite traitor, Bradley/Chelsea Manning.

But the going opinion is that its a Mueller sealed Indictment. Mueller would have nothing to do with Bradley/Chelsea Manning or Snowden for that matter. Plus there would not have been little need for a sealed indictment at the point when the Feds would have been after Assange. He sought Asylum from his molestation charges which are in Sweden, not from Manning or Snowden charges.
 
Last edited:
At this point, Trump could end up in jail and the Trumpets would still call it a witch hunt.
 
But the pub is that its a Mueller sealed Indictment. Mueller would have nothing to do with Bradley/Chelsea Manning or Snowden for that matter.

There is no evidence as to where the indictment comes from. The Trump DOJ was also looking into indicting Assange, although publishing information in the public domain hardly seems like a crime regardless of how inflammatory the information is. If that were the case, the NYT would have lost the Pentagon Papers case.
 
There is no evidence as to where the indictment comes from. The Trump DOJ was also looking into indicting Assange, although publishing information in the public domain hardly seems like a crime regardless of how inflammatory the information is. If that were the case, the NYT would have lost the Pentagon Papers case.

I doubt publishing is what is in the Assange Indictment. That remains to be seen.
 
Back
Top Bottom