• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump met Putin without staff or note takers present — again

marke said:
So many unqualified distant observers have so many questions about how president Trump conducts affairs of state. Sit and wonder, but do not think he needs help from millions of disgruntled quacks who don't understand what is going on and who foolishly think they have better ideas.
Click to expand...

And you're qualified? :lamo

Judging by your posts you're not qualified to be a dog catcher.

Here's what just one person qualified to comment on Trump's behavior says:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/31/poli...ht-trump-intelligence-chiefs-cnntv/index.html
 
Last edited:
EnigmaO01 said:
And you're qualified? :lamo

Judging by your posts you're not qualified to be a dog catcher.

Here's what just one person qualified to comment on Trump's behavior says:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/31/poli...ht-trump-intelligence-chiefs-cnntv/index.html
Click to expand...

Albright has a checkered past and less than stellar record as SOS and at the UN. Students at Syracuse boycotted her speaking there because of her war crimes.

Of course a dedicated democrat socialist will find fault with Trump. That is what the "Goddamn America" commies do.
 
marke said:
Albright has a checkered past and less than stellar record as SOS and at the UN. Students at Syracuse boycotted her speaking there because of her war crimes.

Of course a dedicated democrat socialist will find fault with Trump. That is what the "Goddamn America" commies do.
Click to expand...

But she is more than qualified due to her past position. Isn't that what you were harping about?

McCarthy from the 1950's called. He wants his hyperbole on hidden communists back.

You can stop looking under every bed for "commies." They're right out in the open. Our president even has secret coversations with a former KGB officer and admires him.
 
Last edited:
EnigmaO01 said:
But she is more than qualified due to her past position. Isn't that what you were harping about?
Click to expand...

I should think a democrat socialist accused of war crimes is qualified to criticize Trump? No.
 
EnigmaO01 said:
But she is more than qualified due to her past position. Isn't that what you were harping about?

McCarthy from the 1950's called. He wants his hyperbole on hidden communists back.

You can stop looking under every bed for "commies." They're right out in the open. Our president even has secret coversations with a former KGB officer and admires him.
Click to expand...

And they're not commies anymore, they are now the fascists they fought back in the 1940s. (Yeah, f*** you too, Nietzsche.)
 
apdst said:
Show us the law "dereliction of duty" as it applies to the president.
Click to expand...

In a Articles impeachments doc it could easily be one of the articles merely by proclamation there need be no law
 
OscarLevant said:
In a Articles impeachments doc it could easily be one of the articles merely by proclamation there need be no law
Click to expand...

From The Constitution:

"...bribery, high crimes and misdemeaners..."

There's no law making dereliction of duty a crime (for civilians).
 
marke said:
I should think a democrat socialist accused of war crimes is qualified to criticize Trump? No.
Click to expand...

Whatever you accuse her of she's definitely more qualified than you. That is unless you're holding out on us and your ignorant posts are just a ruse.

I'm more qualified than Trump and that's not saying much. I've held presidential office in two non profit organizations, I've never gone bankrupt with my two businesses, and I served my country.
 
apdst said:
From The Constitution:

"...bribery, high crimes and misdemeaners..."

There's no law making dereliction of duty a crime (for civilians).
Click to expand...

I'm talking about articles of impeachment are based on high crimes and misdemeanors

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_crimes_and_misdemeanors

The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct by officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, refusal to obey a lawful order, chronic intoxication, and tax evasion. Offenses by officials also include ordinary crimes, but perhaps with different standards of proof and punishment than for nonofficials, on the grounds that more is expected of officials by their oaths of office.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
EnigmaO01 said:
Whatever you accuse her of she's definitely more qualified than you. That is unless you're holding out on us and your ignorant posts are just a ruse.

I'm more qualified than Trump and that's not saying much. I've held presidential office in two non profit organizations, I've never gone bankrupt with my two businesses, and I served my country.
Click to expand...

Lots of quacks think they are more qualified than Trump to be president. That is what stupid ego causes.
 
marke said:
Lots of quacks think they are more qualified than Trump to be president. That is what stupid ego causes.
Click to expand...

Uh huh... No more bigger ego than Trump and he had no prior political experience.
 
EnigmaO01 said:
Uh huh... No more bigger ego than Trump and he had no prior political experience.
Click to expand...

How can a proud leftist liberal measure Trump's ego against his own to come up with a just analysis?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom