• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump may cheat and pay off women, but that won't get him impeached

trixare4kids said:
Don't agree with the article or didn't read it? Which is it?
You might want to read my last sentence again...

If you don't think the Democrat's emphasis has gone from collusion to campaign finance violations, I don't know what to tell you.
Click to expand...

You claimed "The left", a Dem and an article do not constitute the left no matter how hard you want it to be. You got called on your dishonest comments as usual. Dishonest comments are all you have. Pathetic, but then I don't expect any intelligent or honest comments from a Trump supporter.
 
You will never hear about Obama paying off people he cheated on his wife with.

First, the media would bury it and second, he didn't get the names of any of the men at the bathhouse
 
trixare4kids said:
Don't agree with the article or didn't read it? Which is it?
You might want to read my last sentence again...

If you don't think the Democrat's emphasis has gone from collusion to campaign finance violations, I don't know what to tell you.
Click to expand...

It is possible for Trump to have done more than one thing wrong.
 
Moderate Right said:
Yes, both sides have become rabid, using nonstop investigations as a political tool.However, even if Trump were to serve two terms, I don't agree there would be significant damage. In fact, we would be better off than if we had had Hillary for two terms, or even one term. I breathed a HUGE sigh of relief when she lost. Other than the stock market, the country has been running really well so far under Trump. Any significant damage will come from both sides putting their jobs aside to do nothing but investigate the other side.
Click to expand...

Laughable Never Never Land crap. It's not the dems using nonstop investigations as a tool. Your historical illiteracy is quite bracing.
 
Grokmaster said:
ZERO proof that he cheated with either of the blackmailing tramps.
Click to expand...

Their testimony is evidence. It can be rebutted, but it ain't ZERO proof. The fact that they were paid off is also not ZERO proof. We have their word, Trump's denials, and the payoffs. Probable cause.
 
Would those people who voted for him have done so if they knew he'd been rawdogging a porn star while his wife was at home with their newborn? Tough call.

Covering up the hush payments to affect the election is a crime. Especially if the cash was "borrowed" from his election war chest.
 
nobody ever claimed his impeachment would be about the sex, its all his crimes, coordination with russians to influence election, his self dealing and making money off his presidency, obstruction of justice, his sketchy business dealings, breaking campaign finance law. You name it.

But ultimately I don't think he will be impeached because republicans are scumbags that defend him and there are some blue dog dems that pander to the right wing idiots in their states
 
Last edited:
Ikari said:
I don't expect that Trump would be impeached at all. If Trump were a D instead of an R and did the same thing, then of course the Republicans would be clamoring for impeachment and would be upset at him. But as it is, they'll defend them and the Dems won't really have enough power to push impeachment. So we'll have the investigations, and they may turn up some things, but I put zero stock into Trump being impeached. Hopefully defeated in 2020, since I doubt the Republic could come out of a 2-term Trump without some significant damage.
Click to expand...

Of course, your agenda is a elect a Democrat. Trump not running for re-election would be the best outcome.
 
SDET said:
Of course, your agenda is a elect a Democrat. Trump not running for re-election would be the best outcome.
Click to expand...

Not really my "agenda", as I tend not to vote for Democrat, lol. We just need someone other than Trump.
 
Moderate Right said:
This is an article from USA Today (not Fox News) and this person is also a CNN contributor (not Fox News):



https://www.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-may-cheat-pay-092257738.html
Click to expand...

I'd say I'm embarrassed for you and all of the other citizens of Trump Fan Nation on here, tinkling your panties with glee over this article by a "CNN Contributor". But I'm not. You know why? You don't even know who the author is. Here, let me help you out:

Jump to search






Scott Jennings


Personal details


Born
October 26, 1977 (age 41)
Dawson Springs, Kentucky, U.S.

Political party
Republican

Education
University of Louisville (BA)

Scott Jennings (born October 26, 1977) is a former political appointee in the administration of George W. Bush, and is now a public relations executive and conservative commentator.

President Bush appointed Jennings to the position of Special Assistant to the President and Deputy Director of Political Affairs on October 17, 2005. The White House announced the move in February 2006.[1] Jennings had previously served as Executive Director of the Bush-Cheney campaign in New Mexico in 2004, and as a staff member of the Bush-Cheney campaign in Kentucky in 2000.

Today, Jennings is a founding partner of RunSwitch Public Relations,[2] Kentucky's largest public relations and public affairs since 2013.[3] He has been writing a regular column for the Louisville Courier-Journal[4] since 2013, and was signed as an on-air contributor by CNN in 2017. [5] He is routinely cited as an adviser to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell[6] in news publications, and he was part of McConnell's campaigns for the U.S. Senate in 2002, 2008, and 2014.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scott_Jennings

Get your nose out of Trump's rear end. It's pathetic to watch you humiliate yourself in his service.
 
BINGO.....you had to know that Pecker had been offered Immunity for something. Pecker and AMI admit today that the McDougal payments were made with the knowledge of the Candidate (Trump) and for the specific purpose of aiding the campaign. So much for similarities with the Edwards case.

Wonder when we will hear from Weisselberg.
 
Praxas said:
Show us where "the left" claim that, instead of just posting dishonest comments as usual. Looks like dishonest comments are all you can post.
Click to expand...

Not my fault you don't keep up with the news or even read posts here on DP. Why are you here if you don't know what's going on in the world?
 
Cardinal said:
The notion that he won't be impeached for defrauding the American public and criminal campaign violations is only because Republicans wouldn't go along with impeachment; not because those aren't impeachable offenses.
Click to expand...

Not high crimes. Sorry.
 
Cardinal said:
But you personally accept the crimes Trump already committed. One thing I've learned here is that you don't have to convince a trump supporter all the way in order to have still gained something.
Click to expand...

You don't have a damn bit of evidence that Trump committed any campaign violations. Oh yeah, you've got Cohen's testimony. That's believable.
 
Praxas said:
who cares what an "article" mentioned, the Mueller report is not out and we don't know. Still waiting for you to show how "The Left" claim what you are claiming. Since when is "the hill" the ENTIRE left you mention?
Click to expand...

It's very telling that articles mention campaign finance violations but nothing about collusion or obstruction of justice.
 
Moderate Right said:
Not high crimes. Sorry.
Click to expand...

This is the very description of high crimes and misdemeanors. Though it hardly matters. By the time this is over Trump 2020 will be done, dead and buried. Once Trump is out of the presidency he will be spending the entire rest of his life in court or in an orange jump suit or both. So will his kids.
 
Cardinal said:
Neither you nor he have denied the crimes, I see.
Click to expand...

You mean the same crimes that Obama was guilty of and wasn't impeached or indicted? And Obama's crimes involved one hell of a lot more money than with Trump.
 
Praxas said:
You claimed "The left", a Dem and an article do not constitute the left no matter how hard you want it to be. You got called on your dishonest comments as usual. Dishonest comments are all you have. Pathetic, but then I don't expect any intelligent or honest comments from a Trump supporter.
Click to expand...

Why do YOU have to make so many dishonest comments?
 
Grokmaster said:
ZERO proof that he cheated with either of the blackmailing tramps.
Click to expand...

I agree with a lot of your posts but you have to be honest here, Trump boinked these women and they did get paid off for it, but it was over 10 years ago. Trouble for the left is, there is nothing illegal about him doing that or paying them off. Bill Clinton sure did it. Even if it is ruled a campaign finance violation that is pretty small potatoes, and dwarfs in comparison to Obama's campaign finance violations.
 
Moderate Right said:
You don't have a damn bit of evidence that Trump committed any campaign violations. Oh yeah, you've got Cohen's testimony. That's believable.
Click to expand...

Nope, Trump's Department of Justice has corroborating evidence, or else the sentencing memorandum written by Federal Prosecutors would have said that that "Cohen asserts that Trump ordered him to commit the crime.

And the judge at Cohen's sentencing today cited the quote that Trump ordered him to commit the crime, which means that it's now the conclusion of both Trump's DOJ and the court system.

Also, AMI admitted to buying the women's stories to help Trump's campaign in return for assisting Prosecutors, so you'll probably get yet even more verification of Trump involved in criminal conspiracy.
 
Moderate Right said:
You mean the same crimes that Obama was guilty of and wasn't impeached or indicted? And Obama's crimes involved one hell of a lot more money than with Trump.
Click to expand...

Criminal intent.
 
Moderate Right said:
I agree with a lot of your posts but you have to be honest here, Trump boinked these women and did get paid off for it, but it was over 10 years ago. Trouble is, there is nothing illegal about him doing that or paying them off. Bill Clinton sure did it.
Click to expand...

Bill Clinton was charged with perjury, not with Election Campaign violations. Now that Pecker and AMI has flipped, and Weisselberg in already cooperating this case is no longer the Clinton case or anything like it or the Edwards case or anything like it. Trump has got some real problems now alongside those that are still cooking in the pot.

I don' t think Trump is Impeached. I don't even want him impeached. He spends the next two years getting punched in the mouth every day then staggers out of the WH and into court for the rest of his life.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom