Yes - and for goons like (S/I/T) Trump, he has absolutely no moral compass or good conscience that supports in good faith an entire population in the US based on our Constitution. He is dedicated to himself only and admires other dictators.That's the key, I believe. Unless I am missing the point, for which I apologize, I don't understand those in Trump's camp's lack of interest in whether Donald has some investments in a country that might create a real or perceived conflict of interest as president. It seems analogous to Trump not understanding why his AG Sessions recused himself.
I like your vibe - only wish I could depend on it --- meaning I hope the Hell that you're correct.The word shall has no wiggle room. It is only a matter of time until trump is forced to turn them over.
How do you figure? You think the Treasury Department is not part of Biden's Executive Branch? That's a new one.
The conclusion doesn't change the requirements of the law, which was the point of referring to that document. DOJ's conclusion was a given in this discussion. The issue I was discussing with someone else was the legal test. It's very common for people to agree on what the law requires, yet disagree on the conclusion that should be reached based on it in a particular case. In case you were unaware, that's one of the reasons we have courts.
Let me reveal to you a trick you can use when preparing to stick your nose into a conversation between two other people: Always read the entire conversation first. It helps you get a rough idea of what the actual issue is.
I think that is the gist of the legislative oversight claim.The legitimate question for Congress is why does it takes over 5 years to complete a single audit? Is the IRS so incredibly incompetent that it takes years to perform an audit?
Shall baby, count on it.I like your vibe - only wish I could depend on it --- meaning I hope the Hell that you're correct.
The problem existing at the IRS has been Trump's buddy who is commissioner of the IRS, Rettig.How about this? The legitimate question for Congress is why does it takes over 5 years to complete a single audit? Is the IRS so incredibly incompetent that it takes years to perform an audit? Perhaps some legislative streamlining is in order. Let's take a look at those returns that are apparently so complex. Let's quiz the Director of the IRS on why his agency has taken so long.
What? Trump has not been under audit for many years? But Trump told us all he was under audit. Well then, get Mr. Trump in here to straighten this matter out.
"Mr. Trump, have you been under IRS audit since 2015? And please remember, you are under oath."
Who told you that the Treasury Department continues to object?
You think that new administration do not affect the opinions of the departments? If you thin so, watch what is happening now with the DOJ and how it reverses course in some many issues.
Ohh, so you cite an authority selectively and you prefer to ignore its conclusions which are based on everything that was written in the opinion, including on the requirements that you think that can determine a decision.
Asserting Congressional oversight which went nowhere under TrumpI actually don't think the Dems should continue fighting for his tax returns. For what purpose at this point? It looks very politically motivated. Let the Cyrus Vance deal with it criminally in NY State.
Him first.isnt it time to forget about trump
U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump appointee, dismissed the case in 2019, ruling that the House lacked standing to sue over the national emergency order that allowed Trump to divert military funds to the border wall.
who?isnt it time to forget about trump
isnt it time to forget about trump [sic]
how is this nazificatation of the US?The Nazification of the US continues unabated.
if he committed a crime, that evidence can be turned over...and if he used loopholes to legally skirt paying taxes, that information can be used to close those loopholes via laws.I actually don't think the Dems should continue fighting for his tax returns. For what purpose at this point? It looks very politically motivated. Let the Cyrus Vance deal with it criminally in NY State.
the law says that if they ways and means committee requests a particular tax payer record it is to be turned over to them....there is no wiggle room there.What legal requirement exists that requires Trump to release his tax returns?
if he committed a crime, that evidence can be turned over...and if he used loopholes to legally skirt paying taxes, that information can be used to close those loopholes via laws.
But the same law says they cannot release said records beyond the committee without permission!the law says that if they ways and means committee requests a particular tax payer record it is to be turned over to them....there is no wiggle room there.
But the same law says they cannot release said records beyond the committee without permission!
I suspect the Judge’s concern may be that the committee will not be able to control the records, and thus violate the law!Are they asking to do that? What legal controversy exists that the judge could rule on now?
I suspect the Judge’s concern may be that the committee will not be able to control the records, and thus violate the law!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?