Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

[Bullseye]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

Alright, I suspect you won't like the program presenter, nor perhaps the source herself. But you may care to see the breadth and depth of these investigations into the inauguration - by SDNY.

I'm posting the 2nd video of a 3 video interview Rachel Maddow is doing with Stephanie Wolkoff, who was an assistant to Melania, and was implementing the inauguration events under the Trump's direction. As I earlier stated, the interview (which I saw live) is broken into 3 YouTube video segments, and it's also worth watching the next video in the sequence (Part 3) as well.

Say what we may about the politics or the individuals here, I was taken back by the depth & breadth of the investigations. I believe the same is occurring with Trump's co-conspiracy with Micheal Cohen, in the Stormy Daniels affair. Remember, Trump was named as a co-conspirator in Cohen's felony charging document.

Also, I haven't even touched on Trump's possible liabilities in his dealings with Deuthsche Bank.

So yeah, I think SDNY has some serious possibility of coming after Trump once he's vulnerable.

I made it about half-way through. Madcow stirring ****, a person selling a book playing on LW perceptions of Trump. If they were after Trump for inauguration why do they need tax returns for times prior to his election? Do they really thing IF there were anything crooked going on, it would be declared on his tax return? Sorry, I just think this is yet another chapter in the "get Trump anyway we can" saga.

 

[trixare4kids]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

I made it about half-way through. Madcow stirring ****, a person selling a book playing on LW perceptions of Trump. If they were after Trump for inauguration why do they need tax returns for times prior to his election? Do they really thing IF there were anything crooked going on, it would be declared on his tax return? Sorry, I just think this is yet another chapter in the "get Trump anyway we can" saga.

MSDNC... pure crap noooooz :roll:

 

[Bullseye]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

MSDNC... pure crap noooooz :roll:

Write a book dumping crap on Trump - become a millionaire. :lamo

 

[trixare4kids]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

Write a book dumping crap on Trump - become a millionaire. :lamo

But don't name your "unimpeachable sources"...

 

[Chomsky]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

I made it about half-way through. Madcow stirring ****, a person selling a book playing on LW perceptions of Trump. If they were after Trump for inauguration why do they need tax returns for times prior to his election? Do they really thing IF there were anything crooked going on, it would be declared on his tax return? Sorry, I just think this is yet another chapter in the "get Trump anyway we can" saga.

Well, thanks for giving it a try. My impetus was that you could see the various investigations the author was under, and how deep the investigations were going into the Trump's. That part might not have come 'till around half-way, and I probably could have set you up better.

 

[CaughtInThe]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

Write a book dumping crap on Trump - become a millionaire. :lamo

a book written by Trump's "Sammy the Bull".



you should sleep well tonight. more bad news isn't coming.

 

[independentusa]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs’ widow for ‘wasting money’ on supporting magazine run by ‘con man’ Goldberg | Independent



"Earlier this week, The Atlantic published an article that described Mr Trump as unwilling to honour the US' s war dead, instead calling lost service members and prisoners of war “losers” and “suckers”.

----

“Steve Jobs would not be happy that his wife is wasting money he left her on a failing Radical Left Magazine that is run by a con man (Goldberg) and spews FAKE NEWS & HATE. Call her, write her, let her know how you feel!!!” said Mr Trump."


Yeah, I'm sure she's worried.

Trump hates people who are actually rich and made it for themselves.

 

[Bullseye]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

Well, thanks for giving it a try. My impetus was that you could see the various investigations the author was under, and how deep the investigations were going into the Trump's. That part might not have come 'till around half-way, and I probably could have set you up better.

I understand what he's under, but honestly it seems more political than legal. And a lot of crass people lining up for a shot at the golden apple. Our personal papers are protected by the fourth amendment - subject, of course, to their relevance in a crime investigation. So far that connected seems to be lacking. Same with Congress's attempts. They haven't been able to tie his papers to relevance with any legislative purpose.

 

[Bullseye]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

But don't name your "unimpeachable sources"...

They all have the same name: Anon E. mouse :lamo

 

[CaughtInThe]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

They all have the same name: Anon E. mouse :lamo

you really think this all isn't mapped out don't you?

 

[tres borrachos]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

Let me know when he's convicted of any. Until then you're sucking wind.
Can the insults and personal attacks.

Let us know when Hillary Clinton is convicted of any crimes. But that didn't stop you from chanting "Lock her up" with the morons at the Trump rallies.

 

[CaughtInThe]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

Let us know when Hillary Clinton is convicted of any crimes. But that didn't stop you from chanting "Lock her up" with the morons at the Trump rallies.

i would love to see a list of all the things that Trump/Trump Republicans accused Hillary/Obama/Democrats of (that they are guilty of themselves).

it has to be extensive. and it would be funny as hell.

 

[Bullseye]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

Let us know when Hillary Clinton is convicted of any crimes. But that didn't stop you from chanting "Lock her up" with the morons at the Trump rallies.

I don't give a crap about Hilary. FBI had an airtight case against and Strzok and Comey played games to get her off.

 

[Bullseye]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

you really think this all isn't mapped out don't you?

And you DO think it's all mapped out?

Wanna buy a bridge?



Pelosi would be your neighbor!!

 

[CaughtInThe]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

And you DO think it's all mapped out?

Wanna buy a bridge?

View attachment 67294497

Pelosi would be your neighbor!!

I see this is your first rodeo.

Pay attention. You'll learn a lot.

 

[Bullseye]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

I see this is your first rodeo.

Pay attention. You'll learn a lot.

Not from you.

 

[CaughtInThe]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

Not from you.

you should pay attention to how things are mapped and play out leading up to a presidential election. you obviously are new to this.

 

[Bullseye]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

you should pay attention to how things are mapped and play out leading up to a presidential election. you obviously are new to this.

Wrong.

 

[CaughtInThe]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

Wrong.

you don't even know that this stuff is mapped out. this is obviously your first campaign season.

 

[Aunt Antifa]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

a book written by Trump's "Sammy the Bull".



you should sleep well tonight. more bad news isn't coming.

This is the same group that would demand everyone watch cLInToN caSh for the really real truth.

 

[Bullseye]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

you don't even know that this stuff is mapped out. this is obviously your first campaign season.

Yeah, whatever; you're a legend in your own mind.

 

[Aunt Antifa]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

And you DO think it's all mapped out?

Wanna buy a bridge?

View attachment 67294497

Pelosi would be your neighbor!!

Hey, ya’ll bought a wall that wasn’t there so maybe you’ll get lucky.

 

[CaughtInThe]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

Yeah, whatever; you're a legend in your own mind.

you're the one who thinks this stuff is just random leading up to an election.


it's basic stuff.

 

[Bullseye]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

you're the one who thinks this stuff is just random leading up to an election.


it's basic stuff.

You really have no concept of what I'm saying.

 

[Chomsky]

Re: Trump launches attack on Steve Jobs' Widow (over his own "suckers" and "losers" comments)

I understand what he's under, but honestly it seems more political than legal. And a lot of crass people lining up for a shot at the golden apple. Our personal papers are protected by the fourth amendment - subject, of course, to their relevance in a crime investigation. So far that connected seems to be lacking. Same with Congress's attempts. They haven't been able to tie his papers to relevance with any legislative purpose.

Maybe. We won't know until Trump loses Presidential immunity, and SDNY shows their hand. But if Trump wins the election, he can out-run the statutes-of-limitation. Lucky him!