Trump is Right to Question Hispanic Judge

[bubbabgone]

I don't refuse sites based on them saying what I don't like. I refuse sites that have no journalistic integrity and just throw stuff against the wall. I do not get my news from wacko sites from the right or left. I do not post anything on this site nor express an opinion that I can not back up with either objective, empirical evidence or solid journalism that can be cross-referenced to empirical evidence. Sorry, but World Nut Job Daily went on and on about the Obama birth certificate. They indulged in that kind of shoddy journalism and thus have zero credibility.

If you think what they say is true, then it is up to you to post links to other OBJECTIVE sites (or cites). We can generally assume, as most people on this board do, that stuff on World Net Daily is nothing but political porn. It should not be used for the foundation of anything unless its a thread in Conspiracy Theories.

Find credible third-party evidence and I will look at it. I am here to learn, not the "hear myself talk".... but the Internet is full of political porn. I have no interest in that.

If you had looked at what they presented you would have seen it had links with screen-shot graphics that supported what they claimed.

Ya know, dismissing information because of where it came from is often either a lazy man's excuse or efforts to avoid uncomfortable facts.

 

[bubbabgone]

Not to me.

I believe you. Your criteria is not what's said or done but who said or did it.

 

[PirateMk1]

That may be, but the La Raza Lawyers Association is not the same as the La Raza you are speaking about.
But his Associations and their positions in regards to illegals is enough to create the appearance of bias.

They have an affiliation. It would be the same as the Klu Klux Klan Lawyers Association. The association might not be racist in the in the least, but normally if they name themselves after say the Klu Klux Klan or in this case La Raza, I would say concerns over bias are to be expected.

 

[Excon]

They have an affiliation. It would be the same as the Klu Klux Klan Lawyers Association. The association might not be racist in the in the least, but normally if they name themselves after say the Klu Klux Klan or in this case La Raza, I would say concerns over bias are to be expected.

There has been no evidence of an affiliation one way or the other.
As I already pointed out, that Lawyer's Association with him serving on the Scholarship committee and it giving one to an illegal is sufficient to show he is for what Trump is against.
It is just one piece of the totality of evidence of what he is for.

His membership with the Hispanic National Bar Association and them being directly against Trump and purposely trying to harm him, speaks more to a perception of bias.