• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump is manipulating job numbers again

99percenter

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 31, 2011
Messages
9,495
Reaction score
3,169
Location
Chicago
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
The government is making a big change in how it reports jobless claims. Here’s why - MarketWatch


The Bureau of Labor Statistics said last week it will change its method for adjusting initial jobless claims to account for seasonal swings in employment. That’s a big deal.

As a result, new claims could show a large decline of potentially 200,000 or more in the week ended Aug. 29. The BLS will report the numbers at 8:30 a.m. Eastern.

Why the change?

The agency’s traditional season-adjustment process worked fine when the U.S. experienced regular ups and downs in employment around the holidays or the end of the school year. Tens of thousands of people, for example, are hired before Christmas and left go after the New Year. The claims numbers are adjusted to smooth out these normal swings in employment.


Yet the old approach to seasonal adjustments has been thrown out of whack by a once-in-a-century pandemic. The seasonally adjusted numbers have constantly exceeded the actual number of people applying for benefits, with the gap becoming especially large in the past month.

Consider the most recent week.

The government said new jobless claims in the week ended Aug. 22 rose by 1 million after seasonal adjustments. Yet actual or unadjusted claims increased by a smaller 821,591.

That’s an 18% difference.

If it’s not confusing enough, the government won’t revise prior figures for jobless claims under the old method of seasonal adjustments.

Trump is going to great lengths to lie and cheat to steal the election.
 

Rogue Valley

Putin = War Criminal
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
82,991
Reaction score
67,924
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent

Captain Adverse

Classical Liberal Sage
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
18,965
Reaction score
25,112
Location
Mid-West USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other

What are you talking about?

Seasonal adjustments always occur. There are such things as SEASONAL jobs. Like summer jobs kids and university students do, while teachers and college instructors are on vacation.

There are seasonal farming jobs, seasonal construction jobs, seasonal sales jobs.

Many of these have been affected by Covid-19 shutdowns and State regulations/restrictions.

Many REGULAR jobs have been affected by Covid-19 restrictions.

Add to that the fact that the Unemployment "stimulus" payments, where people make more on unemployment than they would at the job they lost, encourages unemployment?

As a result, employment/unemployment figures are fluctuating.

IMO your side is trying to make the worst case scenario ignoring all those factors that are really not within the Administration's control.
 
Last edited:

99percenter

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 31, 2011
Messages
9,495
Reaction score
3,169
Location
Chicago
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Very Conservative
What are you talking about?

Seasonal adjustments always occur. There are such things as SEASONAL jobs. Like summer jobs kids and university students do, while teachers and college instructors are on vacation.

There are seasonal farming jobs, seasonal construction jobs, seasonal sales jobs.

Many of these have been affected by Covid-19 shutdowns and State regulations/restrictions.

Many REGULAR jobs have been affected by Covid-19 restrictions.

As a result, employment/unemployment figures are fluctuating.

IMO your side is trying to make the worst case scenario ignoring all those factors that are really not within the Administration's control.

I don't have a side. I just want the true numbers out without trump's manipulation.
 

Captain Adverse

Classical Liberal Sage
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2013
Messages
18,965
Reaction score
25,112
Location
Mid-West USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
I don't have a side. I just want the true numbers out without trump's manipulation.

Well, then do your own "numbers" and then you can "trust" them.

But IMO there are a lot of "sides" these days who like to "manipulate" facts in order to sell something. Trump is going to present the best face on an issue. Opponents are going to present the worst face on the same issue.

In this case IMO more "Trump BAD!" narrative to feed the needy anti-Administration frenzy.

I choose to see his efforts and his successes/failures differently. :coffeepap:
 

pinqy

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
7,029
Reaction score
3,132
Location
Northern Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
One huge problem with that story: The Bureau of Labor Statistics has ****-all to do with unemployment insurance claims. They don’t collect them, report them, or use them to calculate the Unemployment level or rate (except as part of adjustments for local area unemployment statistics)

The Employment and Training Administration of the Dept of Labor deals with all things unemployment insurance.
 

PNW Guy

CAUTION: SNARK AREA!
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 14, 2020
Messages
2,485
Reaction score
1,088
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Left
Well, then do your own "numbers" and then you can "trust" them.

But IMO there are a lot of "sides" these days who like to "manipulate" facts in order to sell something. Trump is going to present the best face on an issue. Opponents are going to present the worst face on the same issue.

In this case IMO more "Trump BAD!" narrative to feed the needy anti-Administration frenzy.

I choose to see his efforts and his successes/failures differently. :coffeepap:

Yeah you see successes that aren't and dismiss/ignore any failings. It's why you've earned this:

NT9kM93_d.webp


Amd why no one but your fellow cultists pays any attention to you or gives you any credibility that you're clearly NOT due. :lamo
 

roberthughey

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 17, 2020
Messages
499
Reaction score
145
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
If this true, it makes sense the weekly number should reflect the actual number of people applying for benefits.

------------------------


"The seasonally adjusted numbers have constantly exceeded the actual number of people applying for benefits, with the gap becoming especially large in the past month."
 

SenorXm/Sirius

DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 23, 2015
Messages
21,297
Reaction score
18,475
Location
New York State, USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
LOL.. And for 8 years Fox and their brainwashed audience,without any evidence, accused Obama's Admin of fudging the economic/unemployment numbers to make them look better than they really were.

And now Trump IS actually fudging the numbers.. LOL.. Where is the outrage from Fox, and the other lying Con talking heads?
 

pinqy

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
7,029
Reaction score
3,132
Location
Northern Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
LOL.. And for 8 years Fox and their brainwashed audience,without any evidence, accused Obama's Admin of fudging the economic/unemployment numbers to make them look better than they really were.

And now Trump IS actually fudging the numbers.. LOL.. Where is the outrage from Fox, and the other lying Con talking heads?
Trump has nothing to do with it. I am sure he wouldn’t understand the concepts or the math involved, and I doubt he even knew about this change.

And the change in methodology can just as easily make the numbers look worse than without the change.
 

SenorXm/Sirius

DP Veteran
Joined
Feb 23, 2015
Messages
21,297
Reaction score
18,475
Location
New York State, USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
Trump has nothing to do with it. I am sure he wouldn’t understand the concepts or the math involved, and I doubt he even knew about this change.

And the change in methodology can just as easily make the numbers look worse than without the change.

He don't have to understand, all he has to do is have 1 of his yes-men in place... Example: Look at Barr, Trump understands nothing about the law, the Constitution, or any legalities. But Barr blocks and obstructs for Trump and his crime family.
 

pinqy

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
7,029
Reaction score
3,132
Location
Northern Virginia
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Centrist
He don't have to understand, all he has to do is have 1 of his yes-men in place... Example: Look at Barr, Trump understands nothing about the law, the Constitution, or any legalities. But Barr blocks and obstructs for Trump and his crime family.

A minor change to a minor statistic probably wouldn't even have to go through the Secretary of Labor, let alone the White House. And the change makes methodological sense and would not necessarily benefit Trump. The idea that this change is "manipulating" the data in favor of Trump is ridiculous ; which is why I'm ridiculing it.
 
Top Bottom