Trump flips table, walks out

[Paradoxical]

The 60 minutes interview with Leslie Stall. Trump throws a tantrum and leaves.

Leslie Stahl is just another Goebbelsian Assassin.

 

[Parrish]

And that huge book that Kayleigh McEnany gave to Leslie Stahl was mostly blank pages.

No new Trump Healthcare Plan was ensconced within the hardcovers.

I'm shocked.

It'll be there in 2 weeks.

 

[Parrish]

“But you’re okay with tough questions...?”

”No, I’m not.“

And this is the guy republicans are certain can handle the tough leaders of the world. Sure. Okay.

No wonder Putin, MBS, Duterte, Bolsonaro, Erdogan, Kim and the rest of the tyrants love him. What a snowflake.

 

[Hari Seldon]

The 60 minutes interview with Leslie Stall. Trump throws a tantrum and leaves.

He is such a *****. So much for that tough guy demeaner. Took his ball and went home like the prima donna he truly is.

 

[Cardinal]

No wonder Putin, MBS, Duterte, Bolsonaro, Erdogan, Kim and the rest of the tyrants love him. What a snowflake.

I wish I was making this up, but trump literally said that people should vote for him because dictators preferred him over Biden. You can't make this up.

 

[Integrityrespec]

Urban Dictionary: flip a table

to lose one's shit; to become enraged or angry by the actions of another.

www.urbandictionary.com

Uh, I don't think you got that point.

 

[Parrish]

I wish I was making this up, but trump literally said that people should vote for him because dictators preferred him over Biden. You can't make this up.

Yet he does and they think that's a good thing. And they call themselves patriots. Pffft.

 

[ReubenSherr]

The 60 minutes interview with Leslie Stall. Trump throws a tantrum and leaves.

When did he throw a tantrum?

When did he flip a table?

He ended the interview, professionally.

 

[Hari Seldon]

Leslie Stahl is just another Goebbelsian Assassin.

She dared ask the malignant narcissist scumbag a question. God forbid. The "greater leader" pouted, then took his ball and went home. What a coward.

 

[uptower]

 

[roguenuke]

Someone needs to get better information.



There was 5 minutes until Pence's interview, that's why he left. Link courtesy of the Guardian.

Second link is the entire interview, not the clipped version 60 minutes posted.

He was supposed to walk with her to that interview with Pence. So no, he definitely walked out like a child, ended it early because he can't handle "tough questions".

 

[tosca1]

The 60 minutes interview with Leslie Stall. Trump throws a tantrum and leaves.

Lol. Good thing I saw the episode BEFORE it got aired on Sunday. The network couldn't edit theirs to suit their narrative!

Instead - Trump was able to EXPOSE their bias for all the viewers to see!
Trump's been gaming, and one-upping all these media people so far!




And.....I like this part too about Stall going on and on with Trump about wearing masks - and yet she has been caught not wearing it
in close proximity of others! At the end of that interview!


Well people,

media - more than anyone else - has a great responsibility to the people too!

After all, people rely on the media for information!


Therefore, if you're reporting and scaring, and pretending to care how shocked you are about the rise in cases, and deaths due to Covid -
kindly wear your mask, Leslie Stall. Be an example to your viewers.
You just showed yourself to the world as just another airhead. A biased one.







You can't keep reporting and scaring the daylights out of people about this covid 19, 24/7
(attacking the President for it, whose job ALSO INCLUDES PROTECTING and SECURING the ECONOMY)...........

......................when you moron expose your hypocrisy!


You're not above COVID 19, Stall!

 

[Connery]

Lol. Good thing I saw the episode BEFORE it got aired on Sunday. The network couldn't edit theirs to suit their narrative!
Instead - Trump was able to EXPOSE their bias for all the viewers to see!
Trump's been gaming and one-upping all these media people so far!


And.....I like this part too about Stall going on and on about wearing masks - and yet she has been caught not wearing it
in close proximity of others!

Well people, media - more than anyone else - has a great responsbility to the people too!






You can't keep reporting and scaring the daylights out of people abput this covid 19 24/7 (attacking the President whose job ALSO INCLUDES PROTECTING and SECURING the ECONOMY)...........when you moron exposed your hypocrisy!

You're not above COVID 19, Stall!

The only thing Trump exposed was his fear of answering questions he didn’t like. Running away instead of dealing with an issue.....just like how he has handled COVID-19

 

[tosca1]

During Trump’s 60 Minutes sit-down, Lesley Stahl humiliated herself


The CBS 60 Minutes fiasco was all of Lesley Stahl’s doing; she embarrassed herself. She thought that she had the President in her sights and she intended to belittle him. Why not? She and her network have a long history of deceitful editing with the goal of destroying people they loathe. Remember Dan Rather’s “fake but accurate” defense of his phony documents meant to derail George Bush’s re-election.

Stahl’s interview was not an interview, it was an ambush. She did not count on him pushing back; that is how dense she is. Anyone paying attention to Trump knows one thing for sure: when challenged, especially when unfairly challenged, he pushes back.

Where has Stahl been these past five years? Is she so arrogant she thought she could shame the man unlike all the others who have tried and failed? Apparently so. She may think she stands apart from other interviewers but she is just one of a tribe, her questions predictable, her dismissive tone familiar, her habit of interrupting when she did not like what she was hearing is common for her ilk as was her changing the subject when he bested her at every turn.


Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blo...y_stahl_humiliated_herself.html#ixzz6c4BK6Rwm
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook



Of course, those who couldn't see what really happened there, either refuses to acknowledge........ or........they can't understand it.

 

[tosca1]

Here's the interview that was posted by Trump BEFORE it got aired.

 

[Aristaeus]

Leslie Stahl is just another Goebbelsian Assassin.

A journalist asking the President moderately tough questions is literally Nazism.
Why are Trumpers such snowflakes.

 

[Captain Adverse]

The 60 minutes interview with Leslie Stall. Trump throws a tantrum and leaves.

1. There was no "tantrum." He simply chose not to continue, and that was evident at 15:50 in the OP video.

2. He did put up with a lot of "argumentative statements" from Ms. Stahl, much like that "town hall" replacing the 2nd debate.

3. He is correct that Biden hasn't faced much of a challenge, or as the various interviewers are wont to say "the tough questions."

4. As shown in other video, the interview was selectively edited.

5. Of note? She was given a package containing the President's Health Plan, as requested.

Much like your thread Headline, the way your side phrases things is IMHO the real "Fake News" this era has been dealing with.

 

[roguenuke]

1. There was no "tantrum." He simply chose not to continue, and that was evident at 15:50 in the OP video.

2. He did put up with a lot of "argumentative statements" from Ms. Stahl, much like that "town hall" replacing the 2nd debate.

3. He is correct that Biden hasn't faced much of a challenge, or as the various interviewers are wont to say "the tough questions."

4. As shown in other video, the interview was selectively edited.

5. Of note? She was given a package containing the President's Health Plan, as requested.

Much like your thread Headline, the way your side phrases things is IMHO the real "Fake News" this era has been dealing with.

Of note was the fact that a) many of the pages of that huge book were blank and b) the things that were in there were EOs already passed that have little to no effect on healthcare or other legislation passed (which goes through Congress, much of which Trump had little to no input into passing beyond signing what was put before him). That's not a plan for healthcare. If that is how he planned for his businesses, that explains the bankruptcies and lawsuits pretty well.

Lesley Stahl: Giant health care book in Trump interview had 'no comprehensive health care plan'

CBS's Lesley Stahl said the giant book presented to her as the president's health care plan after President Trump walked out of a "60 Minutes" interview had "no comprehensive healthcare plan."

thehill.com

The White House health care plan is still not a health care plan

Kayleigh McEnany said the large binder included Trump's health care plan. That would've been great if her claim had been true.

www.msnbc.com

 

[Captain Adverse]

Of note was the fact that a) many of the pages of that huge book were blank and b) the things that were in there were EOs already passed that have little to no effect on healthcare or other legislation passed (which goes through Congress, much of which Trump had little to no input into passing beyond signing what was put before him). That's not a plan for healthcare. If that is how he planned for his businesses, that explains the bankruptcies and lawsuits pretty well.

Lesley Stahl: Giant health care book in Trump interview had 'no comprehensive health care plan'

CBS's Lesley Stahl said the giant book presented to her as the president's health care plan after President Trump walked out of a "60 Minutes" interview had "no comprehensive healthcare plan."

thehill.com

The White House health care plan is still not a health care plan

Kayleigh McEnany said the large binder included Trump's health care plan. That would've been great if her claim had been true.

www.msnbc.com

I know all of this.

It highlights the problem with both your response, and that of the MSM and members of the general public at large who share your mindset.

That is either a lack of understanding, or in some cases a willful blindness as to how the system works.

It is the same problem Obama had to deal with when he was elected.

The Executive Branch does not make or enact Legislation. (Nor does the SCOTUS, just to throw that our there.)

That is the preserve of CONGRESS.

It is why Obama had to deal with his own Party over just what could and could not be "possible" with the ACA. Big example? His honest and probably heartfelt "you can keep your plan, and you can keep your doctor" promise.

It ran into the wall of Insurance Industry, Big Pharma, and the Medical Sector controls and influence in Congress.

Like Obama had to deal with that initially, and then the loss of the House in the first bi-election 2 years into his first term, so does Trump.

So IMO giving those documents to Ms. Stahl was not to "present his plan," but rather to show his positions and what he wants to try to do.

 

[roguenuke]

I know all of this.

It highlights the problem with both your response, and that of the MSM and members of the general public at large who share your mindset.

That is either a lack of understanding, or in some cases a willful blindness as to how the system works.

It is the same problem Obama had to deal with when he was elected.

The Executive Branch does not make or enact Legislation. (Nor does the SCOTUS, just to throw that our there.)

That is the preserve of CONGRESS.

It is why Obama had to deal with his own Party over just what could and could not be "possible" with the ACA. Big example? His honest and probably heartfelt "you can keep your plan, and you can keep your doctor" promise.

It ran into the wall of Insurance Industry, Big Pharma, and the Medical Sector controls and influence in Congress.

Like Obama had to deal with that initially, and then the loss of the House in the first bi-election 2 years into his first term, so does Trump.

So IMO giving those documents to Ms. Stahl was not to "present his plan," but rather to show his positions and what he wants to try to do.

But those are things already done, not things to be done. He is not presenting a plan. He is presenting crap. He knows it, and all intelligent people know it.

 

[Captain Adverse]

But those are things already done, not things to be done. He is not presenting a plan. He is presenting crap. He knows it, and all intelligent people know it.

Once again? Missing...the...point.

YOU think he is "presenting crap," which IMHO is simply confirmation bias at work; much like Ms. Stahl and the bulk of the MSM intentionally try to do in their reporting.

Trump is just the "manager," or perhaps a better analogy is just the "CEO."

He tells his teams and departments what he'd like to have them work on, and THEY do the scut-work. Then it's passed on to his own Party's Congressional leadership for THEIR teams of "experts" to work on.

Eventually things come back up the line and then the President gets to agree and his Party in Congress tries to enact.

But so many people seem to think (like you do apparently) that the President can simply wave a magic wand and whatever he want's comes to pass.

Obama learned the truth of this lesson, Trump has also learned there are only so many "work-arounds" before he also HAS to depend on Congress to "do."

 

[roguenuke]

Once against...missing...the...point.

YOU think he is "presenting crap," which IMHO is simply confirmation bias at work, much like Ms. Stahl and the bulk of the MSM.

Trump is just the "manager," or perhaps a better analogy is the "CEO."

He tells his teams and departments what he'd like to have them work on, and THEY do the scut-work. Then it's passed on to his own Party's Congressional leadership for THEIR teams of "experts" to work on.

Eventually things come back up the line and then the President gets to agree and his Party in Congress tries to enact.

But som many people seem to think (like you apparently) that the President can simply wave a magic wand and whatever he want's comes to pass.

Obama learned the truth of this lesson, Trump has also learned there are only so many "work-arounds" before he also HAS to depend on Congress to "do."

He is supposed to be a leader, not a manager. That is what a President is.

Three Differences Between Managers and Leaders

Stop thinking about your tasks and start talking about your vision.

hbr.org

Without legislation, he cannot get things through though. That is his job as a leader to work to get policies in place that will push his healthcare plan. Passing EOs that have no weight to them, no substance does nothing.

 

[Captain Adverse]

He is supposed to be a leader, not a manager. That is what a President is.

Without legislation, he cannot get things through though. That is his job as a leader to work to get policies in place that will push his healthcare plan. Passing EOs that have no weight to them, no substance does nothing.

(Sigh)

When a President controls both Houses of Congress, THAT's when he can "lead toward getting things passed."

When a President has a Congress that runs contrary to his goals, as was the case with the prior Administration, and goes double for the current House leadership?

Your claim goes out the window, because it would require (as we've seen with the most recent attempt at a stimulus bill) complete submission to the will of the "opposition Party" or it will refuse to do anything.

(Addendum: Please don't try to deflect with the assertion he had any chance of doing so starting when he was elected. Try to recall that the Democrats were dedicated to impeaching him from the moment he was elected).

 

[roguenuke]

(Sigh)

When a President controls both Houses of Congress, THAT's when he can "lead toward getting things passed."

When a President has a Congress that runs contrary to his goals, as was the case with the prior Administration, and goes double for the current House leadership?

Your claim goes out the window, because it would require (as we've seen with the most recent attempt at a stimulus bill) complete submission to the will of the "opposition Party" or it will refuse to do anything.

(Addendum: Please don't try to deflect with the assertion he had any chance of doing so starting when he was elected. Try to recall that the Democrats were dedicated to impeaching him from the moment he was elected).

Doesn't matter if some Dems were trying to impeach him to begin with (which is unproven crap), he had the power but used it only to get his tax cuts passed.

And everyone should oppose Trump. He's a horrible leader and his plans hurt America.

 

[Captain Adverse]

Doesn't matter if some Dems were trying to impeach him to begin with (which is unproven crap), he had the power but used it only to get his tax cuts passed.

Wrong again. He was also being opposed by old-guard Republicans (many of whom ran against him in the primaries) who did not trust him. Recall, he was a Democrat right up until issues with the "Obama birther" claims pushed him aside.

It was thanks to the Tea Party House leadership that he got anything, especially his tax cut, through that first 2 years.

And everyone should oppose Trump. He's a horrible leader and his plans hurt America.

There you go, off to "Fallacy Land" with the final (and typical Leftist) argument of the desperate...a combination of ad hominem and an emotional appeal.

We were doing so well up to this point.

Tagline time.