- Joined
- Jun 28, 2006
- Messages
- 3,609
- Reaction score
- 1,100
- Location
- Oaxaca, Mexico
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Sen. Clinton and Mr. Trump, as narcissistic liberals, make their position as either Queen or King quite clear:
"CNN reports:
That documentary was not peripheral to that case. It was what the case was about. From the first page of the Court's decision:
"CNN reports:
Hillary Clinton will pledge on Saturday to introduce an amendment to the Constitution to overturn the Supreme Court's Citizen United decision within the first 30 days of her administration, an aide said Saturday.
No matter how much CNN and other water carriers for the Democratic Party try to frame the Citizens United decision as having "opened the floodgates for outside money in politics," that decision determined that it was not in fact illegal for an incorporated organization of citizens to make, advertise, and distribute a documentary film critical of – Hillary Clinton!
That documentary was not peripheral to that case. It was what the case was about. From the first page of the Court's decision:
In January 2008, appellant Citizens United, a nonprofit corporation, released a documentary (hereinafter Hillary) critical of then-Senator Hillary Clinton, a candidate for her party's Presidential nomination. Anticipating that it would make Hillaryavailable on cable television through video-on-demand within 30 days of primary elections, Citizens United produced television ads to run on broadcast[.]"
Blog: Hillary Clinton prioritizes outlawing criticism of Hillary Clinton
And, for Donald Trump:
"Donald Trump has said on several occasions that he wants to, as he puts it, "open up" libel laws, so that he can sue news organizations he believes have written what he calls "hit pieces."
Libel laws now make it extremely difficult for public figures to sue for damages. Still, a President Trump would very likely have a hard time changing them.
When he appeared before the editorial board of theWashington Post this week, Trump was asked to explain what he wanted to do with the nation's libel laws. Trump told the Post, which put a recording of the meeting online, that if a paper gets a story wrong, it should issue a retraction."
Trump's Promise To 'Open Up' Libel Laws Unlikely To Be Kept : NPR
Whether Sen. Clinton is Queen or Mr. Trump is King they want to alter a Supreme Court decision by royal decree to protect...themselves from criticism.
Why is it no surprise that two lifelong Democrats are in sync?
Blog: Hillary Clinton prioritizes outlawing criticism of Hillary Clinton
And, for Donald Trump:
"Donald Trump has said on several occasions that he wants to, as he puts it, "open up" libel laws, so that he can sue news organizations he believes have written what he calls "hit pieces."
Libel laws now make it extremely difficult for public figures to sue for damages. Still, a President Trump would very likely have a hard time changing them.
When he appeared before the editorial board of theWashington Post this week, Trump was asked to explain what he wanted to do with the nation's libel laws. Trump told the Post, which put a recording of the meeting online, that if a paper gets a story wrong, it should issue a retraction."
Trump's Promise To 'Open Up' Libel Laws Unlikely To Be Kept : NPR
Whether Sen. Clinton is Queen or Mr. Trump is King they want to alter a Supreme Court decision by royal decree to protect...themselves from criticism.
Why is it no surprise that two lifelong Democrats are in sync?