• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Campaign Labels Harris "Biden's Liberal Handler" In New Ad

It wasn’t the flu that stopped the Nazis and ended WWII in 1917? Better get a note to the president.

Yup ---- flu ended WWII after thirty years. Trump says so.
 
Oh brother!
If you feel that way now... You're really going to lose your mind when Trump gets reelected.

Yet another example of TDS being real malady.....

You prove the old saw that DENIAL is not just a river in Egypt.
 
I am a sales manager. Been on for over 30 years. I sell stuff, people buy my stuff, I make money, customer is happy, everyone wins. I am also a liberal as defined by neanderthals. They call me and people like me communists or socialists as if I am not a capitalist. Well, lets get it right. I am a capitalist that gives a damn about other people which apparently makes me a communist or socialist. How do these two opposing ideas result in a person like myself?

Not only do these guys not have any empathy, they can’t actually imagine anyone else having empathy either.
 
I can't believe you're making this argument... :roll:

And it's not all conservatives, just a few who have a history of bad faith, dishonest hackery. Anyone can look at my history and see a slew of posts where I address conservative arguments in good faith. That's what I enjoy. And I don't think disagreeing = you're wrong.

As to the particular topic here, if you're willing to accept a corrupt, lying, lazy, proudly ignorant narcissist and authoritarian lover who surrounds himself with a bunch of lying incompetents and is burning down the government step by step and tell us, for example, right out in the open he HOPES to interfere with voting in November, and appoints a billionaire stooge to do just that, and who is doing that as head of USPS, then I'm sorry but your opinion on Biden/Harris doesn't interest me.

:lamo You had 4 years to come up with a challenger to Trump. 4 Years. And what did you guys come up with? Biden/Harris!! An 80 year old, senile, racist white guy who has spent his life in Washington and accomplished nothing and a VP candidate chosen simply because she has dark skin and a vagina. No wonder you dont want to listen to criticism. :lamo But dont take my word for it, take the word of the man who knows Biden best, Obama. In the most prophetic statement since Nostradamus, Obama had this to say of his former VP: Dont underestimate Joes ability to F things up.

Stay in your bubble, Jasper. Its safer there.
 
Trump's intellectual level lol?

Democrats are touting Harris as a "historic pick," because she's black and female. And that means she's a good politician.

This is about the extent of what many of Biden's followers can understand about politics and policy.

Looks like Cowardly Joe pulled one over on the Fitz. ;)

I don't see how these 'historical picks' are somehow being considered by some as 'necessary or needed picks'.
People like Harris are not needed! Eugene Debs & Norman Thomas were not needed when America was on
top of the totem pole of nations during their failed presidential indulgences from 1904 through 1948.

If we didn't need them when it was obvious that this country was on a roll we certainly don't need Harris
when America is divided & our proportion of world GDP is lower than it's been in decades.

Historic pick my ass, when a twice convicted bank robber becomes a major party candidate will that be
an historic pick.
 
"The president’s reelection campaign zeroed in on Harris in a second ad after Biden announced on Tuesday afternoon that he had selected her to be his running mate. The Trump campaign ad condemns Harris for comments she has made on "Medicare for All," gun reform, the Green New Deal and fracking, among other issues, characterizing her as a "socialist" candidate.

The spot begins with the phrase: “Meet phony Kamala Harris, Joe Biden’s new liberal handler.”

“She supports Bernie Sanders’s socialist takeover of your health care,” reads text that appears on screen that is followed by a clip of the California lawmaker saying, “I have always supported Medicare for All.”

It also says that Harris “wants to ban private health insurance plans,” followed by a clip of her saying: “Let’s eliminate all that. Let’s move on.”


Trump campaign labels Harris 'Biden's liberal handler' in new ad | TheHill

In this ad, Harris is even quoted as saying "We should have that conservation," pertaining to having terrorists vote from prisons.

Does this ad accurately reflects Harris's policies?

Would Harris be Biden's handler if elected? Does Biden have the courage to stand up for his own beliefs?




Being the leader of Trumpublicans and QAnons Trump (and Pence) is greatly, deeply, seriously threatened by intelligent, educated and, strong, independent women. His feelings toward Kamala Harris should be no surprise to anyone who has even a basic knowledge of national politics.

Meanwhile, the former love in his life, Stormy Daniels, is pulling a train with over 50 men in an attempt to have an orgasm. Y'all want to 'splain your position (pun intended) on that?
 
No, Harris would not be Bidens handler. That is way above her pay grade. If you watched her in the primaries, she doesnt quite know what she believes. Biden was selected because he is a senile dunce who will do what he is told. Harris was picked because she is a liberal dunce who will do what she is told. They are both puppets without an original idea of their own.

her presidential campaign-highlighted by the napalming Tulsi Gabbard laid on her-shows she's a lightweight picked purely because of her skin color and gender
 
Being the leader of Trumpublicans and QAnons Trump (and Pence) is greatly, deeply, seriously threatened by intelligent, educated and, strong, independent women. His feelings toward Kamala Harris should be no surprise to anyone who has even a basic knowledge of national politics.

Meanwhile, the former love in his life, Stormy Daniels, is pulling a train with over 50 men in an attempt to have an orgasm. Y'all want to 'splain your position (pun intended) on that?

Intelligent? mediocre record at a middle of the road college-even with massive affirmative action programs and a father as a professor, she couldn't land a spot at Stanford (nor UCLA or UC-B) and then she promptly proved she wasn't in the top 50% of those taking the California bar (even after attending an accredited Californian law school)
 
:lamo You had 4 years to come up with a challenger to Trump. 4 Years. And what did you guys come up with? Biden/Harris!! An 80 year old, senile, racist white guy who has spent his life in Washington and accomplished nothing and a VP candidate chosen simply because she has dark skin and a vagina. No wonder you dont want to listen to criticism. :lamo But dont take my word for it, take the word of the man who knows Biden best, Obama. In the most prophetic statement since Nostradamus, Obama had this to say of his former VP: Dont underestimate Joes ability to F things up.

Stay in your bubble, Jasper. Its safer there.

If I am remembering correctly Colin Powell said the same thing about Hillary Clinton during the 2016 election. ;)
 
her presidential campaign-highlighted by the napalming Tulsi Gabbard laid on her-shows she's a lightweight picked purely because of her skin color and gender

Did Harris ever respond to any of that? I remember Gabbard mad some pretty serious allegations
 
I remember when Obama defunded Social Security and Democrats called it a victory for all Americans.

My how times have changed. :lamo
You mean when he signed a bill that ensured Social Security was paid from other funding while temporarily giving a reduction to taxpayers on their payroll tax?

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
Intelligent? mediocre record at a middle of the road college-even with massive affirmative action programs and a father as a professor, she couldn't land a spot at Stanford (nor UCLA or UC-B) and then she promptly proved she wasn't in the top 50% of those taking the California bar (even after attending an accredited Californian law school)

Yet, somehow she managed to fight her way to the top of the game in California and now as the VP candidate for the Democratic Party. Yes, she is an unquestionably bright and talented lady.

I cannot speak to her grades at Morehouse but why should she not have chosen to attend Morehouse? As to why she chose Cal Hastings Law I have no idea. It certainly didn't hurt her career, did it?
 
Yet, somehow she managed to fight her way to the top of the game in California and now as the VP candidate for the Democratic Party. Yes, she is an unquestionably bright and talented lady.

I cannot speak to her grades at Morehouse but why should she not have chosen to attend Morehouse? As to why she chose Cal Hastings Law I have no idea. It certainly didn't hurt her career, did it?
She made it to the VP spot not because of any particular talents she might have but because she had dark skin and a vagina.
 
She made it to the VP spot not because of any particular talents she might have but because she had dark skin and a vagina.

One of the most amazing things about major league affirmative action advocates/Recipients is they pretend they got a position DESPITE being black or female (or both) rather than because of it. The US Attorneys in one of the districts I worked in had two clinton appointees. One guy got the job because his father was a major backer of John Glenn and that man died before Glenn could pay him off-so his son became the USA and later (a highly respected) federal judge. When I congratulated him on Clinton appointing him judge-the first thing he said was -I only got the job because of my father (maybe that was true for the US Attorney position-but he was the best I ever saw). Then his successor was a black female whose supporters claim she got the job DESPITE that. In reality. well connected black federal appellate judge Nate Jones twisted a few arms and this woman, who wasn't much of an attorney, was given the job ahead of far higher regarded DOJ or state AG trial attorneys. That district went from having a great leader to a mediocre one
 
Yet, somehow she managed to fight her way to the top of the game in California and now as the VP candidate for the Democratic Party. Yes, she is an unquestionably bright and talented lady.

I cannot speak to her grades at Morehouse but why should she not have chosen to attend Morehouse? As to why she chose Cal Hastings Law I have no idea. It certainly didn't hurt her career, did it?


Morehouse-an interesting error. Or do all traditionally black colleges look the same to you (she went to Howard). No one goes to Hastings if they can get into UCLA or Stanford or Cal-Berkley.
 
Morehouse-an interesting error. Or do all traditionally black colleges look the same to you (she went to Howard). No one goes to Hastings if they can get into UCLA or Stanford or Cal-Berkley.

Georgia is my home state. I grew up in Atlanta. Morehouse isn't an interesting error. I'm proud that Morehouse is a famed Georgia college. It just rolled off my keyboard. Make of it what you will.
 
One of the most amazing things about major league affirmative action advocates/Recipients is they pretend they got a position DESPITE being black or female (or both) rather than because of it. The US Attorneys in one of the districts I worked in had two clinton appointees. One guy got the job because his father was a major backer of John Glenn and that man died before Glenn could pay him off-so his son became the USA and later (a highly respected) federal judge. When I congratulated him on Clinton appointing him judge-the first thing he said was -I only got the job because of my father (maybe that was true for the US Attorney position-but he was the best I ever saw). Then his successor was a black female whose supporters claim she got the job DESPITE that. In reality. well connected black federal appellate judge Nate Jones twisted a few arms and this woman, who wasn't much of an attorney, was given the job ahead of far higher regarded DOJ or state AG trial attorneys. That district went from having a great leader to a mediocre one

Democrats were so unimpressed with Harris' 'skill sets' that she was the first to drop out of the primaries before a single vote was cast. Now she is ready to step in immediately for the mentally feeble Biden
 
Democrats were so unimpressed with Harris' 'skill sets' that she was the first to drop out of the primaries before a single vote was cast. Now she is ready to step in immediately for the mentally feeble Biden

many were gushing over the woman that Obama said was the "hottest DA in the country"

once she started campaigning, she sunk like a lead balloon
 
Georgia is my home state. I grew up in Atlanta. Morehouse isn't an interesting error. I'm proud that Morehouse is a famed Georgia college. It just rolled off my keyboard. Make of it what you will.

That's a reasonable excuse.
 
You mean when he signed a bill that ensured Social Security was paid from other funding while temporarily giving a reduction to taxpayers on their payroll tax?

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
Yup, that's what I mean. Democrats are hypocrites. They go from "a victory for all Americans" to "terminating social security."
 
"The president’s reelection campaign zeroed in on Harris in a second ad after Biden announced on Tuesday afternoon that he had selected her to be his running mate. The Trump campaign ad condemns Harris for comments she has made on "Medicare for All," gun reform, the Green New Deal and fracking, among other issues, characterizing her as a "socialist" candidate.

The spot begins with the phrase: “Meet phony Kamala Harris, Joe Biden’s new liberal handler.”

“She supports Bernie Sanders’s socialist takeover of your health care,” reads text that appears on screen that is followed by a clip of the California lawmaker saying, “I have always supported Medicare for All.”

It also says that Harris “wants to ban private health insurance plans,” followed by a clip of her saying: “Let’s eliminate all that. Let’s move on.”


Trump campaign labels Harris 'Biden's liberal handler' in new ad | TheHill

In this ad, Harris is even quoted as saying "We should have that conservation," pertaining to having terrorists vote from prisons.

Does this ad accurately reflects Harris's policies?

Would Harris be Biden's handler if elected? Does Biden have the courage to stand up for his own beliefs?

[
Speaking of which, where is trumps new beautiful healthcare plan he said we were all going to love, think those two weeks are over now, any day now???
 
Trump is trying to do his deferral of payroll taxes by EO. The deferred taxes will be due on January 1. It's stupid stimulus as it amounts to a temporary loan from the IRS for a few months, repayable in full as soon as the deferral ends on December 31. So, yeah, there's a lot of difference in the two.
The "deferred" tax can covered by the general fund, which is what Obama did. The biggest difference between the two proposals is the reaction to them by Democrats.
 
Yup, that's what I mean. Democrats are hypocrites. They go from "a victory for all Americans" to "terminating social security."
No. The bill itself was not only written to be temporary, but any shortfall to pay for social security was guaranteed to come from the treasury. There was no question of whether social security being paid during that time.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
 
No. The bill itself was not only written to be temporary, but any shortfall to pay for social security was guaranteed to come from the treasury. There was no question of whether social security being paid during that time.

Sent from my SM-N970U using Tapatalk
It was paid out of the general fund. Same as Trump wants to do.
 
The "deferred" tax can covered by the general fund, which is what Obama did. The biggest difference between the two proposals is the reaction to them by Democrats.

It can be but it's not. The deferral ends December 31st, so will be repayable on January 1st.

And what "Obama" did was get an act through CONGRESS. Which is a pretty big difference versus doing that through an EO, in a very stupid way, because Trump and the GOP Senate are worthless and can't get anything done.

The "Obama" payroll tax cut was also 2%, not 7.65%, which is also a big difference.
 
Back
Top Bottom