• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump calls for Democratic mega-donor George Soros to be charged for supporting ‘violent protests’

B

bongsaway

DP Veteran
Joined
Jan 16, 2019
Messages
61,637
Reaction score
51,491
Location
Flori-duh
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
This is another example of how the gop goes about its dirty business of misinformation and lies to garner support from the base.


President Donald Trump on Wednesday called for Democratic mega-donor George Soros and his son, Alexander, to face federal racketeering charges for supporting “violent protests.”

The Republican, in a post to his Truth Social site, did not specify which protests he believed Soros and his son had supported. But it is the most recent example of Trump using the power of his office to pursue retribution against political opponents.

Once again, no proof just an accusation so we can be assured the faithful will be repeating on here and the base will swallow the bullshit whole.

Trump calls for Democratic mega-donor George Soros to be charged for supporting ‘violent protests’

Trump did not say which protests Soros had supported. His organization denied any wrongdoing.
www.yahoo.com
 
bongsaway said:
President Donald Trump on Wednesday called for Democratic mega-donor George Soros and his son, Alexander, to face federal racketeering charges for supporting “violent protests.”
Click to expand...
What violent protests did Soros specifically support and in what way did he support them? The details are a bit thin.

Someone remind me - how many January 6 rioters did Trump pardon?
 
This is a PERFECT strategy, it will get Righties hard and it will distract them from the Epstein files.

Not to mention that Soros is an old Jew and that always gets Righties worked up.
 
Allan said:
What violent protests did Soros specifically support and in what way did he support them? The details are a bit thin.

Someone remind me - how many January 6 rioters did Trump pardon?
Click to expand...
None, it's all bullshit lying from trump, nothing more.
 
The conspiracy and racketeering laws are serious business. He risks having all his assets seized, which is sizable to say the least. But that what you get for supporting terrorist, which seems to be the in-vogue thing for the left.
 
Lycanthrope said:
Donald wants to go after people who incite "violent protests."

It's a ****ing clown you MAGAs worship.
Click to expand...
I am surprised he is going after the old Jew, I thought his targets were Muslims, black and brown people, gay and transgender people.
 
SNOWFLAKE said:
I am surprised he is going after the old Jew, I thought his targets were Muslims, black and brown people, gay and transgender people.
Click to expand...
Stand by for the MAGA monkeys to praise Taco taking on "DUH GLOBALISTS."
 
dmpi said:
The conspiracy and racketeering laws are serious business. He risks having all his assets seized, which is sizable to say the least. But that what you get for supporting terrorist, which seems to be the in-vogue thing for the left.
Click to expand...

Trump’s attack on George Soros is ludicrous. It also endangers Jews (and everyone else)

Trump’s post presents a fever dream in which one Jewish person is powerful and hateful enough to tear the nation apart.
forward.com

GEORGE SOROS.............
 
Lycanthrope said:
Stand by for the MAGA monkeys to praise Taco taking on "DUH GLOBALISTS."
Click to expand...
Already happened, just read some of the comments above yours. That lot are as predictable as the sun rising in the east.
 
dmpi said:
The conspiracy and racketeering laws are serious business. He risks having all his assets seized, which is sizable to say the least. But that what you get for supporting terrorist, which seems to be the in-vogue thing for the left.
Click to expand...
What are you talking about?
 
Its just fantasy. I would imagine that Soro's has the money to fight. And MAGA are cowards and would taco.
 
This is just another charge to add to the list in dumpytits upcoming impeachment.
 
trump saying he wants to go after an opponent for 'supporting violent protests' as he directly not only supported but ordered the most infamous protest in US history, a violent assault on the US Capitol as it certified the election results in a scheme to try to steal the presidency, I need to award a nomination for the "Irony of the year" award. In addition to it being trump weaponizing the Justice system corruptly - MORE irony with his lies about that.
 
dmpi said:
The conspiracy and racketeering laws are serious business. He risks having all his assets seized, which is sizable to say the least. But that what you get for supporting terrorist, which seems to be the in-vogue thing for the left.
Click to expand...
Trump didn't call the AG or the DOJ. He made a public announcement that will go nowhere. There will be no charges filed, no indictment from a grand jury. No trial. No conviction. The point of the announcement is to generate headlines - headlines that don't have the words "EPSTEIN FILES" in them.
 
dmpi said:
The conspiracy and racketeering laws are serious business. He risks having all his assets seized, which is sizable to say the least. But that what you get for supporting terrorist, which seems to be the in-vogue thing for the left.
Click to expand...
And what happens when Trump is out of office and a democrat is elected? The RICO statute applies to everyone.

The Georgia case is still hanging out there !!
 
dmpi said:
The conspiracy and racketeering laws are serious business. He risks having all his assets seized, which is sizable to say the least. But that what you get for supporting terrorist, which seems to be the in-vogue thing for the left.
Click to expand...
Should the next president indict Trump on racketeering charges for supporting the violent protests on January 6th 2021? Or would that just be "lawfare?"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…