• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump at town hall: if you don't test, you don't have cases.

Mr Person

A Little Bitter
Suspended
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Oct 14, 2015
Messages
64,076
Reaction score
62,238
Location
Massachusetts
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Other
Bolded = Trump
Blue = article



“If you look at what we’ve done compared to other countries, with the excess mortality, the excess mortality rate, we’ve done very, very well.”

Trump can cherry-pick whatever numbers he wants, but as moderator George Stephanopoulos pointed out, the United States ranks poorly compared to its peers on most measures of the coronavirus.
.
.
.
“We were short on ventilators because the cupboards were bare when we took it over.”
This is a Four-Pinocchio claim. When the new coronavirus emerged, the Strategic National Stockpile held 16,660 working ventilators, which turned out to be enough to deal with the initial surge of the pandemic, according to the Department of Health and Human Services. (Almost 11,000 were distributed to states.) HHS said that the number available in March 2020 was essentially the same number as of January 2017, when President Barack Obama left office.
.
.
.
“We have 20 percent of the cases [in the world] because of the fact that we do much more testing. If we wouldn’t do testing, you wouldn’t have cases. You would have very few cases.”


https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ws-town-hall-four-pinocchios-over-over-again/

Yeah, and just as long as you don't get tested for cancer, you won't get cancer. God this guy is so ****ing stupid. Specifically, either so stupid that he thinks people will literally not have COVID just so long as you don't test for COVID, or, he's so stupid that he thinks there is something to gain in having no idea how many people have it or where. There's no good, sane, logical explanation for a statement like he made.

There is an evil, sane, and logical reason though: if you are a wannabe dictator sociopath who could not be bribed to give a crap about how many of your people die, and wish to manipulate information so as to keep people stupidly in the dark and happy when they should be united against you.

He also claimed we're very close to a vaccine and may have it in weeks; in reality, by 2021 is if we're lucky.

He claimed to have created the best economy ever; he didn't. Not only was he handed it by Obama, but Eisenhower, Johnson, and Clinton's were consistently better. (1997, 1998, 1999 had GDP growth of 4.5, 4.5, 4.7, FYI)

He claimed to be very tough on China re: COVID; no, he licked Xi's ass clean publicly.

Claimed he never liked McCain because McCain didn't take care of vets; no, as we know, it's because McCain stayed behind for years of torture with his men and Trump doesn't like people who get caught.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/03/12/trump-coronavirus-timeline/

On and on and on. This is what the debates will be: Trump lying out of his rotten ass, Biden telling the truth but occasionally flubbing a word to avoid a stutter, Trumpists blindly repeating Trump's lies on DP and making fun of Biden's stutter, the rest of reality despairing at the death of the American dream at selfish idiocy's hands.

 
Last edited:
Blue = article
bolded = Trump

“We have 20 percent of the cases [in the world] because of the fact that we do much more testing. If we wouldn’t do testing, you wouldn’t have cases. You would have very few cases.”


https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...ws-town-hall-four-pinocchios-over-over-again/

Yeah, and just as long as you don't get tested for cancer, you won't get cancer. God this guy is so ****ing stupid. Specifically, either so stupid that he thinks people will literally not have COVID just so long as you don't test for COVID, or, he's so stupid that he thinks there is something to gain in having no idea how many people have it or where. There's no good, sane, logical explanation for a statement like he made.

There is an evil, sane, and logical reason though: if you are a wannabe dictator sociopath who could not be bribed to give a crap about how many of your people die, and wish to manipulate information so as to keep people stupidly in the dark and happy when they should be united against you.

That isn’t what he said. Trump suggested that the United States only appears to have a comparatively high percentage of global cases because the United States has a comparatively high rate of testing. And that could be true. Only Israel and Denmark have a higher per capita testing rate than the United States.

E8A8642B-0F7B-43CD-B14B-F8B1EB300CA9.jpg
 
That isn’t what he said. Trump suggested that the United States only appears to have a comparatively high percentage of global cases because the United States has a comparatively high rate of testing. And that could be true. Only Israel and Denmark have a higher per capita testing rate than the United States.

View attachment 67295495

Only if you completely ignore the death toll...
 
Only if you completely ignore the death toll...

Which also ties directly back to testing. Trump isn’t suggesting that cases don’t objectively exist if you don’t test. He is suggesting that the numbers are not necessarily indicative of prevalence. A higher rate of per capita testing means that we’re more likely to find a case, and possibly attribute a death to a case, than a country which isn’t looking as thoroughly - which is everyone except Israel and Denmark.
 
"The cupboards were bare" doesn't work as an excuse in the fourth year of your presidency.
 
Trump supporters everytime Trump gets stupider:

giphy.gif
 
Out of 215 countries, we have the 9th highest deaths per million in the world.
 
That isn’t what he said. <>

“We have 20 percent of the cases [in the world] because of the fact that we do much more testing. If we wouldn’t do testing, you wouldn’t have cases. You would have very few cases.”


Is a direct quote in the article. He said those words. If you want to allege WaPo lied and Trump did not actually say those words, take it up with WaPo. Since it is what he said, that's where I stop in your post.




Which brings us away from the Trump-defending deflection and back to reality, where one of three things is true:

1. He is so stupid that he thinks people will literally not have COVID just so long as you don't test for COVID

2. He is so stupid that he thinks there is something to gain in having no idea how many people have it or where.

3. He is so evil that, as a sociopathic wannabe dictator who could not be bribed to care about how many people COVID kills, he wishes to manipulate information so as to keep his stupid-ass supporters cheering on low COVID numbers even as a mass graves fill up with untested COVID victims.

Seeing as he's on tape admitting deliberately downplaying the virus - not that we needed the admission to know that's what he was doing - we can safely go with #3. He's just so incompetent he didn't manage to suppress information about COVID entirely, so we know about our exceedingly high death rate and case load vs. the rest of the world, and we know about our nearly 200,000 dead.

There is simply no valid reason to lament having discovered lots of cases by testing, and wishing that we hadn't tested so he could say we had low numbers. None, all your spin aside.





If you hate America and like to see dead Americans, vote for four more years of that.
 
Last edited:
Out of 215 countries, we have the 9th highest deaths per million in the world.

The US is also the third highest in per capita testing. So our death rate could mean a lot of things such as:

1) Deaths are more likely to be attributed to COVID in the US because of our higher per capita testing rate.

2) Americans are more likely to be symptomatic or otherwise succumb to this disease for a reason TBD but possibly related to the fact that the United States has a higher population of people with pre-existing conditions that are exacerbated by the disease.
 
For all their "America First" BS they really don't give a **** we're high on the bad list and low on the good list.

They can't even succeed at making America #1 in deaths per million. They fail at everything, even failure.
 
The US is also the third highest in per capita testing. So our death rate could mean a lot of things such as:

1) Deaths are more likely to be attributed to COVID in the US because of our higher per capita testing rate.

2) Americans are more likely to be symptomatic or otherwise succumb to this disease for a reason TBD.

Neat. We have the 9th highest death rate in the world.
 
Out of 215 countries, we have the 9th highest deaths per million in the world.
With the 8 that are ahead of us being the advanced Western democracies, not the bottom of the list ****holes.
 
Neat. We have the 9th highest death rate in the world.

And? It’s not a coincidence that the United States is also the fattest country in the world with all of the pre-existing conditions that implies which make a person more vulnerable to this disease.
 

“We have 20 percent of the cases [in the world] because of the fact that we do much more testing. If we wouldn’t do testing, you wouldn’t have cases. You would have very few cases.”


Is a direct quote in the article. He said those words. If you want to allege WaPo lied and Trump did not actually say those words, take it up with WaPo. Since it is what he said, that's where I stop in your post.




Which brings us away from the Trump-defending deflection and back to reality, where one of three things is true:

1. He is so stupid that he thinks people will literally not have COVID just so long as you don't test for COVID

2. He is so stupid that he thinks there is something to gain in having no idea how many people have it or where.

3. He is so evil that, as a sociopathic wannabe dictator who could not be bribed to care about how many people COVID kills, he wishes to manipulate information so as to keep his stupid-ass supporters cheering on low COVID numbers even as a mass graves fill up with untested COVID victims.

Seeing as he's on tape admitting deliberately downplaying the virus - not that we needed the admission to know that's what he was doing - we can safely go with #3. He's just so incompetent he didn't manage to suppress information about COVID entirely, so we know about our exceedingly high death rate and case load vs. the rest of the world, and we know about our nearly 200,000 dead.

There is simply no valid reason to lament having discovered lots of cases by testing, and wishing that we hadn't tested so he could say we had low numbers. None, all your spin aside.





If you hate America and like to see dead Americans, vote for four more years of that.

Reread my post to see a counter to your absurd interpretation.
 
With the 8 that are ahead of us being the advanced Western democracies, not the bottom of the list ****holes.

So of the ugliest nine kids in a class of 215, we're the least ugly. That's some brag-worthy stuff right there.
 
They can't even succeed at making America #1 in deaths per million. They fail at everything, even failure.
This is how the leftists operate....

The US as #1: Trump is the worst murder of all time.
The US as #9: Trump is a failure even as a murderer.
The US as #198: Trump is hiding data.

Did I get it right?
 
And? It’s not a coincidence that the United States is also the fattest country in the world with all of the pre-existing conditions that implies which make a person more vulnerable to this disease.

Oh, cool, we have the ninth highest death rate from coronavirus and we're the fattest.

It just gets better and better.
 
Oh, cool, we have the ninth highest death rate from coronavirus and we're the fattest.

It just gets better and better.

Substitute “and” with “because” and you may be on to something. For example, one cause of death in COVID cases is heart failure. Don’t you find it reasonable to suggest that a population that is disproportionately obese and in which heart disease is the leading cause of death would be more susceptible to COVID?
 
Last edited:
Substitute “and” with “because” and you may be on to something.
Don't forget that fat and the virus are racist and secretly manipulated by the racists to land mostly on the black people.

That's what the black lesbian in Chicago says. Not exactly in those words but close enough.
 
Bolded = Trump
s, Biden telling the truth but occasionally flubbing a word to avoid a stutter, ]


I wouldn't count on it.
| PolitiFact

Biden's quite a liar, too .

And this is from a left wing site!
He doubled up on this one.
"No U.S. presidents elected before Donald Trump were racist."
Well, technically, I guess you could never say calling Trump a racist is a lie. It's very subjective and we all know Dems call almost every white Republican a rcist.

But in no way , by normal person standards, is Trump a racist.
 
That isn’t what he said. Trump suggested that the United States only appears to have a comparatively high percentage of global cases because the United States has a comparatively high rate of testing. And that could be true. Only Israel and Denmark have a higher per capita testing rate than the United States.

Right, and it's because we've never gotten through the first wave. In many countries the virus is controlled, and there's no need in September for mass testing. So, yeah, we're still testing at very high rates because we have a lot of cases, and then contact tracing, etc.
 
Right, and it's because we've never gotten through the first wave. In many countries the virus is controlled, and there's no need in September for mass testing. So, yeah, we're still testing at very high rates because we have a lot of cases, and then contact tracing, etc.

How do you know that the prevalence of the disease is worse in the United States in comparison to countries which are not performing the same level of per capita testing? You don’t. “We have a lot of cases” because we have a lot of testing to detect those cases.
 
Last edited:
The US is also the third highest in per capita testing. So our death rate could mean a lot of things such as:

1) Deaths are more likely to be attributed to COVID in the US because of our higher per capita testing rate.

2) Americans are more likely to be symptomatic or otherwise succumb to this disease for a reason TBD but possibly related to the fact that the United States has a higher population of people with pre-existing conditions that are exacerbated by the disease.

3) The national response was inept, fractured, and incoherent, and an objective failure.

The most telling thing to me about Trump's response are his indoor rallies, without masks, and without even making an attempt to social distance. If Trump decided to spread it to as many people as possible, that first rally where they HOPED they'd fill a 20,000 person indoor arena to capacity, and have another nearly million people all on the same grounds, without masks required, is the most effective thing he could have done....to infect, then kill off as many as possible, both those attending the rally PLUS a bunch of innocents not stupid enough to attend.

There's no possible way to square that rally with a President who gives a flying **** about the pandemic, or has made a coherent response to it. It was deeply irresponsible, contradicted nearly every word of his own CDC's guidelines, and if we all followed Trump's "leadership" and encouraged mass indoor gatherings nationwide, for hours, without masks or any social distancing, we'd see a truly staggering death toll.

It's only because we as a country IGNORE the "leadership" of the President and his handlers and campaign staff that we're only seeing about 800 deaths per day, as we head into the flu season...
 
How do you know that the prevalence of the disease is worse in the United States in comparison to countries which are not performing the same level of per capita testing? You don’t. “We have a lot of cases” because we have a lot of testing to detect those cases.

Do we also have more deaths due to testing?
 
Back
Top Bottom