Trump asks why US can't use nukes: MSNBC [W: 221]

[Tigerace117]

More of the same, eh? What now, you've stooped to personal attacks? That's a really smart move, always gets you a lot of respect. Forget about a thoughtful argument, what's that going to get you?

Nope, just pointing out the obvious.

 

[Anthony60]

Nope, just pointing out the obvious.

Yes, yes... just dazzling. Very impressive.

 

[AFM]

Right. Murdering a bunch of innocent people wont make anyone want to kill you.

If your solution to ISIS is "be worse than ISIS," then ISIS has already defeated you.

Well with your logic we cannot defend ourselves, and is why our civilizations are on the wayne as all go this way in the end

 

[Deuce]

Well with your logic we cannot defend ourselves, and is why our civilizations are on the wayne as all go this way in the end

Really? You can't find any solution in between "drop nukes on civilians" and "don't defend ourselves at all?"

You know conventional bombs exist, right? And guns? Soldiers? Those are things. We can use those things instead of turning a city into an irradiated crater.

 

[Patrickt]

And that pales in comparison to the morons who fall for Trump and his idiocy, don't you think?

I hate to break the news but Trumpkins are supporting a liberal so they are, therefore, liberals. A Democrat is a Democrat is a liberal.

 

[AFM]

Really? You can't find any solution in between "drop nukes on civilians" and "don't defend ourselves at all?"

You know conventional bombs exist, right? And guns? Soldiers? Those are things. We can use those things instead of turning a city into an irradiated crater.

Now let me see we have been dropping conventional bombs on ISIS for the last couple of years and have done really nothing, but then again Russia has been doing the same in Syria and have got results, collateral damage is part of winning and we have not done much of that over the last fifteen years have we

 

[Threegoofs]

Now let me see we have been dropping conventional bombs on ISIS for the last couple of years and have done really nothing, but then again Russia has been doing the same in Syria and have got results, collateral damage is part of winning and we have not done much of that over the last fifteen years have we

Yeah. We need to indiscriminately bomb civilians like the Russians do.

They are SO cool.

 

[Deuce]

Now let me see we have been dropping conventional bombs on ISIS for the last couple of years and have done really nothing, but then again Russia has been doing the same in Syria and have got results, collateral damage is part of winning and we have not done much of that over the last fifteen years have we

Ahh, so now we are defending ourselves? With those bombs? When you said "can't defend ourselves" you were just full of crap? Is that what you're saying now?

Or, are you suggesting that conventional bombs don't count and murdering a million innocent people or so is the only way to "defend ourselves?" Do you literally want America to be worse than ISIS? Because you're defending a plan that would make America worse than ISIS, and in the end would make America less safe. Why do you want America to be less safe, AFM?