• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump adviser Giuliani asks judge to throw out $1.3 billion lawsuit over his 'big lie' election claims

ouch

Air Muscle
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 1, 2020
Messages
10,087
Reaction score
8,774
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Sidney Powell tried this now we'll see what happens with Giuliani's request. I hope Dominion provides a response to this.


Trump adviser Giuliani asks judge to throw out $1.3 billion lawsuit over his 'big lie' election claims (msn.com)
1617831108326.png
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Donald Trump's former personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday asked a judge to throw out a voting machine company's $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit relating to his false claims about the November 2020 presidential election being rigged.

Giuliani's lawyer said in a court filing that Dominion Voting Systems' lawsuit should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and because the company has not adequately justified its request for money damages.

The filing said Giuliani denies defaming Dominion, adding that the former New York City mayor would present a more forceful defense on the merits if his jurisdictional arguments are rejected by the judge in the District of Columbia assigned to the case.
 
Why can't people say anything they like without repercussion?

Free speech indeed.
 
Last edited:
Technicality ploy by Giuliani, odds are will go nowhere.
 
Sidney Powell tried this now we'll see what happens with Giuliani's request. I hope Dominion provides a response to this.


Trump adviser Giuliani asks judge to throw out $1.3 billion lawsuit over his 'big lie' election claims (msn.com)
View attachment 67327300
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Donald Trump's former personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday asked a judge to throw out a voting machine company's $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit relating to his false claims about the November 2020 presidential election being rigged.

Giuliani's lawyer said in a court filing that Dominion Voting Systems' lawsuit should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and because the company has not adequately justified its request for money damages.

The filing said Giuliani denies defaming Dominion, adding that the former New York City mayor would present a more forceful defense on the merits if his jurisdictional arguments are rejected by the judge in the District of Columbia assigned to the case.
The big lie is big media claiming that election fraud is a big lie. The same media pursued Russia collusion and that Trump stole the 2016 election for 2+ years which turned out to be entirely bogus. They have demonstrated they are incapable of divining truth when it comes to Trump and so many still believe them on this. Fool you twice.
 
The big lie is big media claiming that election fraud is a big lie. The same media pursued Russia collusion and that Trump stole the 2016 election for 2+ years which turned out to be entirely bogus. They have demonstrated they are incapable of divining truth when it comes to Trump and so many still believe them on this. Fool you twice.

Yes, we should all just go back to looking for Obama’s secret birth certificate for another 6 years or so.
 
Guiliani

some say this guy is actually still a lawyer
 
The big lie is big media claiming that election fraud is a big lie. The same media pursued Russia collusion and that Trump stole the 2016 election for 2+ years which turned out to be entirely bogus. They have demonstrated they are incapable of divining truth when it comes to Trump and so many still believe them on this. Fool you twice.
Yes, RudyG has demonstrated he is incapable of telling the truth.

Where is the German server?
 
The big lie is big media claiming that election fraud is a big lie.
It's important to understand that many judges has rejected the notion that their was election fraud. Even AG Barr stated that there wasn't enough evidence of fraud to change the outcome of the election. The media is only reporting the conclusions made by 'officials'. I personally feel that our election process still needs a little make-over, but for the most part it has been about as good as it can be when dealing with a few million voters border to border.
 
The big lie is big media claiming that election fraud is a big lie. The same media pursued Russia collusion and that Trump stole the 2016 election for 2+ years which turned out to be entirely bogus. They have demonstrated they are incapable of divining truth when it comes to Trump and so many still believe them on this. Fool you twice.

The big lie is that the election was stolen from Trump.
 
The big lie is big media claiming that election fraud is a big lie. The same media pursued Russia collusion and that Trump stole the 2016 election for 2+ years which turned out to be entirely bogus. They have demonstrated they are incapable of divining truth when it comes to Trump and so many still believe them on this. Fool you twice.
That is a very direct claim. Can you provide actually evidence for it, other than ranting from right wing web sites.
 
The big lie is big media claiming that election fraud is a big lie. The same media pursued Russia collusion and that Trump stole the 2016 election for 2+ years which turned out to be entirely bogus. They have demonstrated they are incapable of divining truth when it comes to Trump and so many still believe them on this. Fool you twice.

Trump lost bigly, move past the lie.
 
The big lie is big media claiming that election fraud is a big lie. The same media pursued Russia collusion and that Trump stole the 2016 election for 2+ years which turned out to be entirely bogus. They have demonstrated they are incapable of divining truth when it comes to Trump and so many still believe them on this. Fool you twice.

Stone and manafort worked with Russians..but you knew this
 
Why can't people say anything they like without repercussion?

Free speech indeed.
OH BOY! Even I know that free speech is not free speech, or maybe you would like to yell out BOMB next time you are on a flight and see where that lands you.
:rolleyes:
 
The big lie is big media claiming that election fraud is a big lie. The same media pursued Russia collusion and that Trump stole the 2016 election for 2+ years which turned out to be entirely bogus. They have demonstrated they are incapable of divining truth when it comes to Trump and so many still believe them on this. Fool you twice.
cb6d98987107792822e882fa5ae46183.png
 
It's important to understand that many judges has rejected the notion that their was election fraud. Even AG Barr stated that there wasn't enough evidence of fraud to change the outcome of the election. The media is only reporting the conclusions made by 'officials'. I personally feel that our election process still needs a little make-over, but for the most part it has been about as good as it can be when dealing with a few million voters border to border.
Tim knows this, he just has to vent as he is still grieving ;)
 
Sidney Powell tried this now we'll see what happens with Giuliani's request. I hope Dominion provides a response to this.


Trump adviser Giuliani asks judge to throw out $1.3 billion lawsuit over his 'big lie' election claims (msn.com)
View attachment 67327300
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Donald Trump's former personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday asked a judge to throw out a voting machine company's $1.3 billion defamation lawsuit relating to his false claims about the November 2020 presidential election being rigged.

Giuliani's lawyer said in a court filing that Dominion Voting Systems' lawsuit should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, and because the company has not adequately justified its request for money damages.

The filing said Giuliani denies defaming Dominion, adding that the former New York City mayor would present a more forceful defense on the merits if his jurisdictional arguments are rejected by the judge in the District of Columbia assigned to the case.
"Your Honor, I shouldn't be held accountable for lying, sowing distrust in the American Elections, and participating in a false narrative that eventually led to an act of seditious domestic terrorism"
lol
 
It's important to understand that many judges has rejected the notion that their was election fraud. Even AG Barr stated that there wasn't enough evidence of fraud to change the outcome of the election. The media is only reporting the conclusions made by 'officials'. I personally feel that our election process still needs a little make-over, but for the most part it has been about as good as it can be when dealing with a few million voters border to border.
'Officials' signed off on a knowingly false FISA to surveil the Trump campaign. That includes the director of the FBI, asst director and other high ranks like Rosenstein. They now admit that was a mistake. Barr's statement is disturbing. Now we are finding out about hundreds of thousands of ballots in Georgia with no chain of custody and yet the SoS and Governor signed off on the election?

It isn't over. We spent 2+ years investigating whether Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election. That turned out to be completely bogus. Now the same people that were up in arms pushing that narrative are opposed to any investigations or audits of the 2020 election? Do you see a pattern?
 
'Officials' signed off on a knowingly false FISA to surveil the Trump campaign. That includes the director of the FBI, asst director and other high ranks like Rosenstein. They now admit that was a mistake. Barr's statement is disturbing. Now we are finding out about hundreds of thousands of ballots in Georgia with no chain of custody and yet the SoS and Governor signed off on the election?

It isn't over. We spent 2+ years investigating whether Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election. That turned out to be completely bogus. Now the same people that were up in arms pushing that narrative are opposed to any investigations or audits of the 2020 election? Do you see a pattern?
Your posts are filled with so much unsupported pablum.
 
He's living the virtual "I've fallen and I can't get up".
 
That is a very direct claim. Can you provide actually evidence for it, other than ranting from right wing web sites.
I would point you to some of the hearings done in PA, GA, MI and other state legislatures. That is where you will hear some of the people who filed affidavits had any chance to speak. I watched many of those videos to get a sense these people not only had no incentive to lie, but they have been damaged by doing so.

Peter Navarro did a pretty good job, not perfect, documenting the various fraud in the various swing states. Yes he is partisan but he is a Harvard PhD and sourced his work quite extensively.

 
'Officials' signed off on a knowingly false FISA to surveil the Trump campaign. That includes the director of the FBI, asst director and other high ranks like Rosenstein. They now admit that was a mistake. Barr's statement is disturbing. Now we are finding out about hundreds of thousands of ballots in Georgia with no chain of custody and yet the SoS and Governor signed off on the election?

It isn't over. We spent 2+ years investigating whether Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election. That turned out to be completely bogus. Now the same people that were up in arms pushing that narrative are opposed to any investigations or audits of the 2020 election? Do you see a pattern?
4lgjyw.jpg
 
I would point you to some of the hearings done in PA, GA, MI and other state legislatures. That is where you will hear some of the people who filed affidavits had any chance to speak. I watched many of those videos to get a sense these people not only had no incentive to lie, but they have been damaged by doing so.

Peter Navarro did a pretty good job, not perfect, documenting the various fraud in the various swing states. Yes he is partisan but he is a Harvard PhD and sourced his work quite extensively.

In review, The Navarro Report publishes debunked voter fraud allegations which are then shared on social media platforms such as here. Further, in addition to being prepared by someone who doesn’t have the necessary background on election issues, these unsubstantiated claims are disputed by President Trump’s own departments of Justice and Homeland Security. According to a USA Today article dated Jan. 6, 2021 “ Out of the 62 lawsuits filed challenging the presidential election, 61 have failed” and “The decisions have come from both Democratic-appointed and Republican-appointed judges – including federal judges appointed by Trump.” Finally, Attorney General William Barr made a declaration regarding voter fraud, with a quote that reads “the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election.”
The Navarro Report website consists of three volumes of alleged election fraud against President Donald Trump that is presumably compiled by Navarro. The volume titles use highly emotional language such as this “The Immaculate Deception, The Art of the Steal, and Yes, President Trump won.” Navarro’s reports have been debunked and rebuked by credible sources such as Forbes and the Washington Post. Some debunked claims are that Trump’s early election-night leads in several states later won by Biden were the result of fraud, when in fact it was the result of counting mail-in ballots that heavily favored Biden. He also promoted the debunked conspiracy theory that Dominion Voting Software had ties to Hugo Chavez in Venezuala “Dominion’s roots may be traced to an effort by the Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez to rig his sham elections.” This conspiracy was found to be completely false. Finally, Navarro’s claims of election fraud come from very poor sources that have failed numerous fact checks such as Epoch Times, OANN, Newsmax, Just the News, and Steve Bannon.


 
Back
Top Bottom