That assertion that "tax and regulation cuts are pro-business, pro jobs, pro economy, and pro capitalism" is obvious is not so obvious. Eliminating financial regulation that curbed Wall Street excesses and thus allowed Wall St. to take extreme risks caused a financial meltdown that had financial firms that were in business for a century go belly up; caused many people to lose their jobs and caused the economy an 8% decline in GDP.obviously tax and regulation cuts are pro-business, pro jobs, pro economy, and pro capitalism. Is there any sane person in the world who imagines libdemsocialism is good for an economy? Ever heard of East/West Germany, Cuba/Florida, Europe/USA, China pre and post socialism?? A child can understand this but not a liberal. America is on the brink just like Germany was on the brink in 1933!! Pure liberal ignorance is the norm in human history
and it repeats itself over and over.
That assertion that "tax and regulation cuts are pro-business, pro jobs, pro economy, and pro capitalism" is obvious is not so obvious. Eliminating financial regulation that curbed Wall Street excesses and thus allowed Wall St. to take extreme risks caused a financial meltdown that had financial firms that were in business for a century go belly up; caused many people to lose their jobs and caused the economy an 8% decline in GDP.
In China, that has scant environmental regulations, the air gets so bad that people are urged to stay home and not work, at not only a personal cost to health, but an economic cost of loss of income and productivity.
Loss of adequate enforcement of off-shore oil drills caused the Deepwater Horizon create a severe ecological disaster that cost $65 billion -- not including the devastation of the shrimp industry and loss of employment and hit to the local economy.
You see, conservatives hold the belief, like a religion, that regulations are bad. It just isn't true. Even Adam Smith, the father of capitalism, recognized the need for regulation. His example was fire codes that protect the safety of the public.
Eliminating financial regulation that curbed Wall Street excesses and thus allowed Wall St. to take extreme risks caused a financial meltdown
In China, that has scant environmental regulations, the air gets so bad that people are urged to stay home and not work, at not only a personal cost to health, but an economic cost of loss of income and productivity.
Loss of adequate enforcement of off-shore oil drills caused the Deepwater Horizon create a severe ecological disaster
WASHINGTON — Many of the world’s largest automakers joined together Thursday to tell President Trump that one of his most sweeping deregulatory efforts — his plan to weaken pollution standards for automobiles — threatens to hurt their profitability and produce “untenable” instability in one of the nation’s most important manufacturing sectors.
In a letter signed by 17 companies including Ford, General Motors, Toyota and Volvo, the automakers asked Mr. Trump to go back to the negotiating table on the planned rollback. It represents the most forceful statement to date by the auto industry against Mr. Trump’s effort to weaken the tailpipe pollution rules, one of President Barack Obama’s signature policies to fight climate change.
Please document automakers asked Trump to roll back (make them weaker) tail pipe standards. My take is that you make up your own alternative reality. Moreover, there is no reason why automakers can't voluntarily make all cars meet the higher California standards.Yes instability and lower profits because California (biggest market) will have its own much higher pollution standards requiring automakers to make one car for America and one for California. Automakers asked Trump to roll back tail pipe standards and he did. Also, way over your heard I'm sure.
Please document automakers asked Trump to roll back (make them weaker) tail pipe standards. My take is that you make up your own alternative reality.
Read the next two sentences for context: "However, the Trump administration went further than the industry expected, using the rollback to attack California’s legal authority to set its own rules. Since the 1970 Clean Air Act, California has had special authority to write its own pollution regulations.Alternative reality: Honestly you are too slow to be here!! Here is quote from your own article. Don't be discouraged by your constant and pure liberal ignorance!! What is the hope for our country with liberals like you around??
"Soon after Mr. Trump took office, chief executives from Detroit’s top automakers personally asked the president to loosen the some elements of the Obama-era regulations."
obviously tax and regulation cuts are pro-business, pro jobs, pro economy, and pro capitalism. Is there any sane person in the world who imagines libdemsocialism is good for an economy? Ever heard of East/West Germany, Cuba/Florida, Europe/USA, China pre and post socialism?? A child can understand this but not a liberal. America is on the brink just like Germany was on the brink in 1933!! Pure liberal ignorance is the norm in human history
and it repeats itself over and over.
Please document automakers asked Trump to roll back (make them weaker) tail pipe standards. My take is that you make up your own alternative reality. Moreover, there is no reason why automakers can't voluntarily make all cars meet the higher California standards.
There is nothing wrong with having emissions standard that keep the air clean and our lives healthy.
Read the next two sentences for context: "However, the Trump administration went further than the industry expected, using the rollback to attack California’s legal authority to set its own rules. Since the 1970 Clean Air Act, California has had special authority to write its own pollution regulations.
The Trump administration last year unveiled a draft plan that would have rolled back the Obama rule and stripped California of the right to set tougher state standards. In subsequent months, both sides said they hoped to negotiate their way to a final plan that would lead to one national standard, avoiding potential courtroom showdowns."
illiterate of course. Industry obviously wanted everyone on one national standard. You lied! You are a typical liberal.
Please, I suggest you read and try to learn and don't comment . Even for a liberal you alway missed what middle school reading would have allowed you to pick up.
do you ever see liberals crowing about an increase in regulations,
Liberals want government to do certain things, like environmental protection; when their objective coincides with industry objectives, liberals support industry.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?