• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Treatment of Muslims (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tigerace117

Tigerace117

DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2016
Messages
83,693
Reaction score
20,773
Location
Chicago
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I've been seeing this a lot and I don't understand why it's the case that people seem to think it's a-ok to talk **** about Muslims, even stating things which are blatantly untrue and calling for authoritarian measures to be utilized, just because their Muslims.

Doing this would be throwing American principles in the gutter and stomping all over the Constitution.
 
Tigerace117 said:
I've been seeing this a lot and I don't understand why it's the case that people seem to think it's a-ok to talk **** about Muslims, even stating things which are blatantly untrue and calling for authoritarian measures to be utilized, just because their Muslims.

Doing this would be throwing American principles in the gutter and stomping all over the Constitution.
Click to expand...

Then you don't understand much. It is because of what Muslims are doing, and what these Muslims you defend are not doing.

Free speech is what critisism of Islam is. Isn't free speech the most important thing in the Constitution? You surpress free speech, you surpress truth. Doesn't sound like you understand American principles, much.
 
Tigerace117 said:
I've been seeing this a lot and I don't understand why it's the case that people seem to think it's a-ok to talk **** about Muslims, even stating things which are blatantly untrue and calling for authoritarian measures to be utilized, just because their Muslims.

Doing this would be throwing American principles in the gutter and stomping all over the Constitution.
Click to expand...

It is no different than talking **** against the Nazis or ISIS.
 
coldjoint said:
Then you don't understand much. It is because of what Muslims are doing, and what these Muslims you defend are not doing.

Free speech is what critisism of Islam is. Isn't free speech the most important thing in the Constitution? You surpress free speech, you surpress truth. Doesn't sound like you understand American principles, much.
Click to expand...

That's a highly selective idea of free speech. There's also the fact that free speech applies to everyone, not just those you agree with.
 
Tigerace117 said:
I've been seeing this a lot and I don't understand why it's the case that people seem to think it's a-ok to talk **** about Muslims, even stating things which are blatantly untrue and calling for authoritarian measures to be utilized, just because their Muslims.

Doing this would be throwing American principles in the gutter and stomping all over the Constitution.
Click to expand...

Right about now is a good time to use the FDR method of moving all Moslems to concentration camps the same as he did the Japanese until this jihad is over.
 
Bucky said:
It is no different than talking **** against the Nazis or ISIS.
Click to expand...

No. No it really isn't.

It'd be like if somebody started talking **** about all Christians because of the Lord's Resistance Army, or the IRA, or the NLFT
 
Tigerace117 said:
That's a highly selective idea of free speech. There's also the fact that free speech applies to everyone, not just those you agree with.
Click to expand...

Am I surpressing, or anyone, restricting Muslims from speaking? Seems to me you are pretty confused, it is usually Islams critics that are restricted and condemned.
 
coldjoint said:
Am I surpressing, or anyone, restricting Muslims from speaking? Seems to me you are pretty confused, it is usually Islams critics that are restricted and condemned.
Click to expand...

Yeah, because they want to keep people who have done nothing wrong from practicing their religion and speaking their mind. They seek to deny others their basic rights yet complain they are the ones being persecuted.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Uh huh. Locking up loyal Americans is a "perfect plan". Brilliant.
Click to expand...

You don't know who the loyal ones are.

Islam makes no provision for loyalty to a Nation.

Any Moslem loyal to a Nation is NOT a devout Moslem.

There is nothing in Islam such as Christianity's "render unto Caesar that which is Caesars".

This is because the Quran is simply a long amateurish rant against Judaism, Christianity, and local Arab polytheism.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Yeah, because they want to keep people who have done nothing wrong from practicing their religion and speaking their mind. They seek to deny others their basic rights yet complain they are the ones being persecuted.
Click to expand...

Any Islamic practicing their religion is a threat to the rest of the non-Islamic world.
 
Riveroaks said:
You don't know who the loyal ones are.

Islam makes no provision for loyalty to a Nation.

Any Moslem loyal to a Nation is NOT a devout Moslem.

There is nothing in Islam such as Christianity's "render unto Caesar that which is Caesars".

This is because the Quran is simply a long amateurish rant against Judaism, Christianity, and local Arab polytheism.
Click to expand...

Ah, and then the paranoia card comes out.

More then anything else it seems like a new kind of McCarthyism to me.

"We have no actual proof that these people are traitors, but they totally are and there's thousands of them"
 
Tigerace117 said:
Ah, and then the paranoia card comes out.

More then anything else it seems like a new kind of McCarthyism to me.

"We have no actual proof that these people are traitors, but they totally are and there's thousands of them"
Click to expand...

San Bernardino CA is proof enough.
 
coldjoint said:
I have heard of them. How come Muslims haven't formed an all Muslim combat regiment yet? Are you saying if they were in camps they would?
Click to expand...

Well, let's see. Starting with the fact that that's not even allowed anymore in the US military....

There have been Muslim soldiers in the American military since at least the civil war(African American ex slaves) and there's anywhere from 3500-5000 at least currently in the military.
 
Tigerace117 said:
Ah, and then the paranoia card comes out.

More then anything else it seems like a new kind of McCarthyism to me.

"We have no actual proof that these people are traitors, but they totally are and there's thousands of them"
Click to expand...

And you suggest a new type of "Chamberlainism"?
 
Tigerace117 said:
Well, let's see. Starting with the fact that that's not even allowed anymore in the US military....

There have been Muslim soldiers in the American military since at least the civil war(African American ex slaves) and there's anywhere from 3500-5000 at least currently in the military.
Click to expand...

That many and no combat unit?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom