- Joined
- Sep 2, 2012
- Messages
- 2,325
- Reaction score
- 311
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
How did Congresswoman Frederica Wilson (D) know that George Zimmerman was guilty?
Breitbart News: Breitbart TV
Breitbart News: Breitbart TV
She is a race pimpin' bitch.How did Congresswoman Frederica Wilson (D) know that George Zimmerman was guilty?
Breitbart News: Breitbart TV
Since this clip is from more than a year ago, before George Zimmerman had even been arrested, I'm not sure what relevance it has to today. We all know that the local police and prosecutors never wanted to arrest Zimmerman. Only a massive protest and outcry prompted the state to step in and prosecute. So none of this rhetoric issued as a part of that protest is relevant at this point.How did Congresswoman Frederica Wilson (D) know that George Zimmerman was guilty?
Breitbart News: Breitbart TV
It is relevant because it shows how Politicians like this race pimping bitch got involved and claimed someone guilty before they had even been arrested.Since this clip is from more than a year ago, before George Zimmerman had even been arrested, I'm not sure what relevance it has to today. We all know that the local police and prosecutors never wanted to arrest Zimmerman. Only a massive protest and outcry prompted the state to step in and prosecute. So none of this rhetoric issued as a part of that protest is relevant at this point.
How is that even possible?But then Darth Vader is Obama's real father, so....
Sure it is. It's relevant to liberal arrogance. The Congresswoman pronounced Zimmerman guilty LONG before all this information came to light. In essence, she saved herself the trouble of getting the facts and tried to fast track Zimmerman to the electric chair, instead. This is how Democrats work.Since this clip is from more than a year ago, before George Zimmerman had even been arrested, I'm not sure what relevance it has to today. We all know that the local police and prosecutors never wanted to arrest Zimmerman. Only a massive protest and outcry prompted the state to step in and prosecute. So none of this rhetoric issued as a part of that protest is relevant at this point.
Whats the remedy for a thug committing assault and battery and a rabid dog?How did Congresswoman Frederica Wilson (D) know that George Zimmerman was guilty?
Breitbart News: Breitbart TV
Oh for Christ sake. Because she demanded an investigation into a dead black kid that the PD and local attorney general did not give a crap about, it's automatically "how Democrats work"???? Yeah, right. Because dead black kids don't warrant an investigation, amIrite?Sure it is. It's relevant to liberal arrogance. The Congresswoman pronounced Zimmerman guilty LONG before all this information came to light. In essence, she saved herself the trouble of getting the facts and tried to fast track Zimmerman to the electric chair, instead. This is how Democrats work.
Sarcasm noted.Barack Obama is Trayvon's real father. But then Darth Vader is Obama's real father, so....
Your assertion is incorrect.Oh for Christ sake. Because she demanded an investigation into a dead black kid that the PD and local attorney general did not give a crap about, it's automatically "how Democrats work"???? Yeah, right. Because dead black kids don't warrant an investigation, amIrite?
The Chief of Police and the Investigating Detectives were COMPLETELY CORRECT in not arresting Zimmerman. It was, and is, a CLEARLY "OPEN & SHUT" case where Zimmerman is NOT GUILTY.Since this clip is from more than a year ago, before George Zimmerman had even been arrested, I'm not sure what relevance it has to today. We all know that the local police and prosecutors never wanted to arrest Zimmerman. Only a massive protest and outcry prompted the state to step in and prosecute. So none of this rhetoric issued as a part of that protest is relevant at this point.
The local PD DID give a crap about it.... They investigated...... just because you and other racist ass black people don't like the results of their investigation doesn't mean they didn't give a crap about it.Oh for Christ sake. Because she demanded an investigation into a dead black kid that the PD and local attorney general did not give a crap about, it's automatically "how Democrats work"???? Yeah, right. Because dead black kids don't warrant an investigation, amIrite?
My sentiments exactly. You had your response prepared before you even caught what was said on the video, didn't you. Watch the ENTIRE video this time, and LISTEN to what she said.Oh for Christ sake.
it is BEYOND scary this person is serving in Congress. Do you hear the absolute idiocy of her statements? Damn the police, damn the justice system, damn the special prosecutor, arrest this man!!! I've heard enough evidence on the 911 call!! LOL She probably heard the NBC version of the 911 call. She's advocating vigilante lynching.How did Congresswoman Frederica Wilson (D) know that George Zimmerman was guilty?
Breitbart News: Breitbart TV
I think those who elected her need it more.She needs a mental examination.
This "massive protest" was actually quite small and led by the usual, race hustling, poverty pimps, splashed all over on the liberal MSM to fan the flames, but then gained considerable political momentum when liberal congress critters and the teleprompter in chief also chimed in. Not to be outdone by the rich and famous, the NBP then decided to place a dead or alive bounty on GZ - but that is not a crime, in the USA, if you look like the president and the head of the DOJ. Did these same bozos, who skipped over that minor attempt at a lynching, not then send the FBI down to Floriduh to investigate this lack of "appropriate" action on this "hate crime"!Since this clip is from more than a year ago, before George Zimmerman had even been arrested, I'm not sure what relevance it has to today. We all know that the local police and prosecutors never wanted to arrest Zimmerman. Only a massive protest and outcry prompted the state to step in and prosecute. So none of this rhetoric issued as a part of that protest is relevant at this point.
I could give you a number of them. The difference is when a conservative goes "off the deep end", conservatives call them out. As is evidenced by this thread, when a liberal "goes off the deep end" fellow liberals defend them, by actually using "for christ's sake" to preface their defense.give me some examples of conservatives going off the deep end???
Does TM look like a rabid dog to you?I could give you a number of them. The difference is when a conservative goes "off the deep end", conservatives call them out. As is evidenced by this thread, when a liberal "goes off the deep end" fellow liberals defend them, by actually using "for christ's sake" to preface their defense.
I find the reverse to be true.I could give you a number of them. The difference is when a conservative goes "off the deep end", conservatives call them out. As is evidenced by this thread, when a liberal "goes off the deep end" fellow liberals defend them, by actually using "for christ's sake" to preface their defense.