Girls do not want boys to see them doing what they do in the restroom or shower .. and to girls in a restroom or shower, a boy is all about his genitals, the physicality of his
sex.
Girls will be freaked out that a physical-sex boy could walk into the restroom at any time .. and you bettter believe there will be raunchy guys exposing themselves to physical-sex girls who try to use the
boys' restroom .. not to mention boys walking into the girls' restroom pretending to be transgender.
It doesn't matter what's in the transgender's mind -- what matters is the physical sex of the person in the restroom and the more than 99% of the population who will be freaked out by this scenario.
Elementary school kids have not had sex-change operations, and normals really aren't going to grasp what transgender means, certainly not enough to dress or pee in front of an opposite physical-sex kid.
In addition, with transsexuals, their self-identity gender isn't the only body-brain cross-purposes defect, sometimes their attracted-to gender is the
same as their self-identity gender as well, so there's really no guaranteed solution here.
This legislation was a codependent dysfunction coupled with a political pander to the disaffected masses of the liberal Dems that own California, a really dumb and emotionally dysfunctional move.
Transgenders need to accept the birth-defect nature of their condition and make physical-sex their only restroom choice, even if they're attracted to that gender; they need to learn to live with their birth defect rather than requiring others to surrender their naturally understandable and very important psychological and physical boundary privacy.
And allowing a big 6'9" physical-sex boy to play basketball on the
girls team??? Simply because his self-identity gender is a girl???
That's taking making allowances for those with birth defects way too far!