• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tony Blair police protection costs under scrutiny

jujuman13

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
4,075
Reaction score
579
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Link
BBC News - Belgian child sex abuse police probe death threats

Quote(Foreign Secretary William Hague has said police protection for ex-prime ministers should not cost anything more "than is absolutely necessary".

It follows newspaper reports that Tony Blair's bodyguards are costing taxpayers £250,000 a year in expenses.)

The answer to this is really quite simple.

While Mr. Blair is resident in the UK the costs for his protection should be paid for by the UK taxpayer.
Whenever Mr. Blair is outside the UK his protection should be paid and provided for by himself or by those he works for.
 
Last edited:
Link
BBC News - Belgian child sex abuse police probe death threats

Quote(Foreign Secretary William Hague has said police protection for ex-prime ministers should not cost anything more "than is absolutely necessary".

It follows newspaper reports that Tony Blair's bodyguards are costing taxpayers £250,000 a year in expenses.)

The answer to this is really quite simple.

While Mr. Blair is resident in the UK the costs for his protection should be paid for by the UK taxpayer.
Whenever Mr. Blair is outside the UK his protection should be paid and provided for by himself or by those he works for.

I'm not totally sure what Belgian Catholic child sex abuse has to do with this, but Blair's protection costs do seem to be very high. If he's going on all these trips NOT on behalf of Britain then why should the British tax payer be picking up the bill?
 
**** I know so guys who would protect Blair full-time for less than 250,000 pounds.
 
Back
Top Bottom