- Joined
- Jun 25, 2008
- Messages
- 8,080
- Reaction score
- 3,918
- Location
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I think a better term would be a protein compromise. We are designed to eat meat in order to thrive.
We were designed to eat both, sure, but it doesn't mean we have to do so in the modern world. We are a species at the apex of the food chain and we have the intelligence to change our lifestyles. The claim that vegetarianism is unnatural is tired and cliche at this point. Vegetarianism pre-dates the modern world. Look at India, one of the oldest civilizations on earth.
It's a compromise to the natural order. plain and simple.
I think if the world ended tomorrow and we had to rely on the wilderness for food again combined with limited, local agriculture, I agree that we would see most if not all people eating meat again. But that's not the reality. Our system allows for vegetarianism and veganism if one chooses, and it can be done wonderfully.
Actually I was simply correcting your claim about the order of what has more fat.
Thanks.
Actually you can't. I can give you chicken that is far less healthy than a piece of beef or pork.
I'm sure you can, and I would believe you, but statistics have to make broad generalizations so that we can have some understanding of our world. You're lucky to be talking to someone who thinks the anecdotal is just as important as the statistical.
Take this to the logical conclusion.
The logical conclusion where you make a statement on my behalf and then claim what I meant? That sounds more like an assumption to me, and you know what they say about assumptions. :mrgreen:
Pescatarians actually live longer than vegetarians, vegans, or meat eaters. It's because their unsaturated fat intake is much higher than saturated, which is why I said that if you can reduce meat, and more specifically your saturated fat content, it will increase longevity. There are plenty of long-term studies that verify this. Heck, it's even mainstream knowledge now. Excess saturated fat increases your risk for heart disease and stroke quite a bit.
It is far harder to get this "balanced" diet with not eating meat, as not doing what is natural, is anything but "balanced."
From my personal standpoint, based on my own constitution, I agree with you. I found not eating meat to be a difficult lifestyle. But I can't make that claim for everyone. And I refuse to acquiesce to the notion that eating meat = natural = better. My mother, for practically her whole life, has rarely eaten meat. She grew up in a very traditional coastal setting where meat and fish were abundant, but her inclination (not due to politics or her family) was to not eat much. I think it's perfectly natural for some people to be averse to meat eating.
I really don't appreciate vegetarians OR meat eaters making vast claims on everyone's behalf.
link?
Google?
I'll take this as a concession on your part.
Don't start.