Today.... These are the kind of fake news headlines the public is subject to reading....

[nota bene]

How would jesus handle this...continue to lie and lash out, or just be humble and try to be truthful? It's not too late.

It's never too late, not for any of us. A good beginning might be looking to one's own behavior. But I'm curious: Why are you bringing Jesus into these uncharitable comments? Aren't your own judgments here enough?

 

[Bullseye]

There you go!
But stop bringing facts to the discussion.
You'll give the TDSers a migraine.

That's fair; their abject idiocy often gives me a pain somewhat lower. :lamo

 

[Bullseye]

Looks like SFran Nan came to her senses, realizing her original stunt wasn't so bright.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/pe...give-state-of-the-union-address-on-february-5

Yeah, I saw that. Wonder if the Dems will get AOC to give the dem response. :shock:

 

[akyron]

Aside from all the proof already provided, that is.

Bye bye...

Perhaps the wall should be fully transparent.



Walls obviously provide additional security or the people arguing against them would not have walls, doors, windows, or keys for that matter. The armed guards are pretty cool as well.

Quite the hypocrisy on display by these people.

 

[Mach]

It's never too late, not for any of us. A good beginning might be looking to one's own behavior. But I'm curious: Why are you bringing Jesus into these uncharitable comments? Aren't your own judgments here enough?

By all means, tell me one should look at their own behavior, as you question mine.

And why not bring the teachings of Christ into why it's good to be honest in communicating with others? I'm not sure you're aware, but reason doesn't work on all types of people in this forum Nota, and many on the right drape themselves in the trappings of Christianity, so perhaps that's an alternative way to appeal? When reason and honesty fail, maybe Christ's example? I'm surprised you'd question that. But this seems off-topic. Am I not right that Jesus wouldn't cheer-lead personal attacks?

Quote Originally Posted by Bullseye View Post
. . . Mach acts stupid

It's okay... One can never have enough new admirers.

But by all means, come to the aid of those you feel are in need, and question those you think have erred.

Maybe piggy-back on it like this:

Are you sure its an act?

Yuk yuk. All in good fun right? When you can't reason, insult them. Works for some!
But do question me about mentioning the example of Christ, if that's what you think is the right thing to do here.

 

[nota bene]

By all means, tell me one should look at their own behavior, as you question mine.

And why not bring the teachings of Christ into why it's good to be honest in communicating with others? I'm not sure you're aware, but reason doesn't work on all types of people in this forum Nota, and many on the right drape themselves in the trappings of Christianity, so perhaps that's an alternative way to appeal? When reason and honesty fail, maybe Christ's example? I'm surprised you'd question that. But this seems off-topic. Am I not right that Jesus wouldn't cheer-lead personal attacks?

My first statement was of my own belief. My second sentence offered global advice that I think is sensible because while you can choose to control what you say and do, you can't control others. That's a universal "you." My third sentence questioned the content of your post, and I do wonder why you brought Jesus into the discussion. I also now wonder what you mean by "trappings of Christianity." What are these?

What I don't wonder at all about is your intent here. You insinuate that when reason and honesty (as you define these) fail, it a dishonest appeal is what's left.

 

[trixare4kids]

By all means, tell me one should look at their own behavior, as you question mine.

And why not bring the teachings of Christ into why it's good to be honest in communicating with others? I'm not sure you're aware, but reason doesn't work on all types of people in this forum Nota, and many on the right drape themselves in the trappings of Christianity, so perhaps that's an alternative way to appeal? When reason and honesty fail, maybe Christ's example? I'm surprised you'd question that. But this seems off-topic. Am I not right that Jesus wouldn't cheer-lead personal attacks?



But by all means, come to the aid of those you feel are in need, and question those you think have erred.

Maybe piggy-back on it like this:

Yuk yuk. All in good fun right? When you can't reason, insult them. Works for some!
But do question me about mentioning the example of Christ, if that's what you think is the right thing to do here.

I have something just for you....

Keep reading.

 

[trixare4kids]

My first statement was of my own belief. My second sentence offered global advice that I think is sensible because while you can choose to control what you say and do, you can't control others. That's a universal "you." My third sentence questioned the content of your post, and I do wonder why you brought Jesus into the discussion. I also now wonder what you mean by "trappings of Christianity." What are these?

What I don't wonder at all about is your intent here. You insinuate that when reason and honesty (as you define these) fail, it a dishonest appeal is what's left.

He does it to control the conversation.

As you can see, it doesn't work with me.

 

[trixare4kids]

By all means, tell me one should look at their own behavior, as you question mine.

.

Oh waaaaaaaaaah

 

[Mach]

Oh waaaaaaaaaah

I accept your forfeiture.
But three posts just to say you can't defend your phony, contrived posting, that's a bit much.