This nearly puts me asleep it's not in the least bit surprising. I agree with your point though.
Weapons systems, sure, however military weapons and civilian weapons aren't exactly an outclass system in the government's favor, yes, they have enforcement with full auto, but those firearms are contracted out to the lowest bidder, if you got into service pistols and long distance rifles, most of the civilian stuff is far better an more reliable. In this particular case, there is an extreme abuse of power but it just goes to show that given the opportunity these "trusted individuals" are no better than their counterparts outside of the positions.
Wait, aren't all officers responsible for the bad actions of these? After all, people who want me disarmed throw bad actors on the citizen end in gun owners' faces, if the "professionals" are this unethical then maybe they aren't the only ones capable of bearing arms.
This is less disturbing than Fast and Furious but, the reporting on "how bad these guns are" is over the top.
Not sure what the weapons were because the story was short on technical but you're right, not as bad as Fast & Furious. This is yet another example along with F&F showing that the "trusted government" actors are abusing their positions with reckless abandon, and showing that "the professionals" that should be the "sole gun users" aint so professional after all.
I'm addressing my topic. You are getting away from my point and so I'm bringing you back to it. I couldn't issue a strawman because I haven't assigned you as saying anything, I have explained the entire thread with the response you are complaining about.
Yep. For a big talker on gun control he sure does have a lot of gun related snafus from the way his department handled "surveillance" of an Arizona gun show(breaking numerous state and federal felonies in the process) to not even having control of rogue gun runners in said department.
