How do you quote me and not acknowledge what happened? You think you can plow his BS narrative forward and ignore the lie and racism?
No. You acknowledge the lie and racism first. Then maybe I'll address your "whoa is me, life isn't fair" whines.
To pretend that the liberals didn't fall all over themselves that Obama was elected as the first black president is not factual, because they did.
It's a fact. It is neither racist, nor bigoted. It is simply a fact. It is as much of a fact that this was a historic moment as well, to be the first black president. There's no denying this either.
To deny fact that the left was fawning all over Obama, you might as well try and pretend that Obama wasn't the first black president, so good luck with that.
Further, the Obama administration did indeed conduct surveillance, wiretapping, and property seizures against a journalist, one who happened to be employed at Fox News at the time. Again. This is simply a fact.
Not sure why you are objecting to facts. I find this rather weird.
The topic or question under discussion is what actions have the Trump administration taken to threaten the press or its freedom, and how does that compare to the action that Obama's administration did take?
Even this topic is a bit of a straying from this threads topic, which is the judge's ruling on CNN's law suit they filed on behalf of Acasta.
As I posted, the ruling wasn't on any 1st amendment question (free speech and free press), it was on a 5th amendment (due process), in that if there are expectations of reporter's behavior while in the WH press corp in order to ensure continued access they need to be documented.
Also as posted, I say fair, and expressed the viewpoint that the administration carefully consider these rules, as they will have set a precedent for the future, and they should be wisely structured and worded.
Now you are all caught up.