• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

To Recuse Or Not To Recuse (1 Viewer)


Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Apr 6, 2017
Reaction score
Political Leaning
Where does the authority lie? If a judge does not recuse themselves from a case where they should, does it fall to the appellate court to rule? Are the recusal conditions straight forward or is there interpretation wiggle room?

If AG Sessions had decided against recusal, what authority would rebuke his decision?
Technically a recusal can be enforced by the court system but that basically never happens. There is almost no way to force a recusal UNLESS there is a clear conflict (Judge has a clear financial interests in the outcome of the case, one of the parties is his wife etc.)

There are 1 of 2 reasons to recuse: 1.) A strict duty such as related to one of the parties - a MANDATORY recusal and 2.) the judge has a bias - a VOLUNTARY recusal. This second one is entirely at the judge's/official's discretion as it has to do with what's in the judge's/official's head OR if the judge/official decides it looks bad if not recusing. A voluntary recusal can not be forced.

Jeff Sessions never HAD to recuse himself as a legal matter. He decides that he should, for whatever reason he made that decision.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top Bottom