Well, no they're not. They never have been, and they never will be.
This is utter gibberish.
The evidence is overwhelming, the decision not to charge her was not made because of lack of evidence it was made because he didn't think he could prove intent, but that is not for him to decide. Many military personnel have been dishonorably discharged for a single breech of security with no question of intent even being considered. This is clearly the case of one set of laws for the Clintons and one for everyone else.
For a conviction? Absolutely. You won't find too many prosecutors who, having seen the case would say otherwise. As a criminal case this one is a loser. That has been obvious to objective observers for a while. There is a reason why the FBI directors subsequent appearance before Congressional committee to explain himself - you know, the one where the Republican's were going to get to the bottom of all this - went down with barely a whimper.
Now as far as facing some sort of internal sanction from the State Department,... that is another matter.
The evidence is overwhelming, the decision not to charge her was not made because of lack of evidence it was made because he didn't think he could prove intent, but that is not for him to decide. Many military personnel have been dishonorably discharged for a single breech of security with no question of intent even being considered. This is clearly the case of one set of laws for the Clintons and one for everyone else.
Apples and oranges. Civil and military law are different. If the law Clinton is alleged to have broken requires intent and intent cannot be proved then in the eyes of the law she did no wrong. If you have a problem with that ask Congress to change the law so that intent is no longer required.
making laws difference is what will bring down nations... it is OUTRAGEOUS that a lower level govt employee is charged MORE SO than a higher and on more harmful actions .......the military is govt employees
the BOTTEM line is America's votes IQ has dropped each and every year to RECORD LOWS and they are getting fooled and electing crooks..... and with crooked leaders then the nation falls .. they elect crooked congress who punishes the military more so with the same act
will the military step in and stop the outrageous harmful laws made by crooked congress elected by low IQ's ??
OUTRAGEOUS and this can make the military to revolt
The military has ALWAYS been subjected to different - usually tougher - rules than civilians.
Like it or not if the law that Clinton would be charged under - a civilian law - says intent is required and intent cannot be proved then she walks. Simple as that.
And of course that doesn't even address the fact that cases are different. No two ones are exactly the same so bemoaning the fact that Clinton gets a pass when a non-military lower level government employee doesn't is, absent a lot more information, an invalid comparison.
very very valid comparison...... military are employees of the GOVT and the VOTERS.....
Elected officials are employees of the GOVT and the VOTERS..
THE VERY SAME...military bringing harm ... brings harm to the govt and the voters
Elected officials bringing harm... brings harm to the govt and the voters
THE VERY SAME.. and laws on harming the govt and the voters should be the same.... and the higher the power that harms the stronger the charge.... this is simply a wrong so called law that must be stopped.
Look friend you can claim they're the same all you want but they are different. The military is subject to the UCMJ as well - potentially - as Federal and State law. Civilians are not subject to the UCMJ. It's that simple.
VERY SIMPLE..... citizens work for the govt doing very important top secrete work especially the higher ups
citizens work for the govt military and if they cause harm they get punished same as sec of state who is a citizen working for the govt where harm could come ....
so very simple.. they are THE SAME
yes they are the same even when so called laws says they are not..... the laws are wrong and those laws will cause problems from being unequal.... laws that causes problems must be changed
Okay. We disagree. The military is a unique institution with a unique mandate and a unique set of problems that cause it to require it's own legal system. If you want to disagree that is your right but it doesn't change the reality.
The REALITY is they are the same... The Reality it is OUTRAGEOUS to charge differently when NOT DIFFERENT
CITIZENS Employed By THE GOVT Sec of State EQUALS CITIZENS Employed by the GOVT Military
NO DIFFERENCE !! The high up SEC of STATE... equals the high up GENERAL
the sec of state doing a crime EQUALS the GENERAL doing a CRIME..... the penalty MUST be the very same
Dude take it up with the Joint Chiefs of Staff. They run the military, not me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?