Bombshell report! The word "Bombshell" has lost its impact due to overuse! Film at 11!It’s about time to retire “Bombshell” in reference to news. It doesn’t mean a thing any longer.
Nor does "Breaking News" which CNN has had running continuously in their chyron since 1992.It’s about time to retire “Bombshell” in reference to news. It doesn’t mean a thing any longer.
It’s about time to retire “Bombshell” in reference to news. It doesn’t mean a thing any longer.
As a pun?Au contraire, Rexedgar. With the war in Ukraine, the reference has been given a new lease on life.
Nor does "Breaking News" which CNN has had running continuously in their chyron since 1992.
Imo, networks should not be allowed to use 'Breaking News' for anything that's over 15 minutes old.It’s about time to retire “Bombshell” in reference to news. It doesn’t mean a thing any longer.
Agreed.It’s about time to retire “Bombshell” in reference to news. It doesn’t mean a thing any longer.
About as alert-full as a Fox News Alert has been for the last 20 years.It’s about time to retire “Bombshell” in reference to news. It doesn’t mean a thing any longer.
Ahyup.It’s about time to retire “Bombshell” in reference to news. It doesn’t mean a thing any longer.
It’s about time to retire “Bombshell” in reference to news. It doesn’t mean a thing any longer.
It’s about time to retire “Bombshell” in reference to news. It doesn’t mean a thing any longer.
Can I rewrite that? How about "Not for anything that's over 15 minutes old and that they've finished analyzing."Imo, networks should not be allowed to use 'Breaking News' for anything that's over 15 minutes old.
It’s about time to retire “Bombshell” in reference to news. It doesn’t mean a thing any longer.
The one that bugs me the most is someone starting a Tweet with "BOOM!" as though some earth-shattering fact is being served up.Bombshell?
What about "blasted", "hit back at", "eviscerated", etc., all those fluff words to make a snide tweet sound important.
We have one of those……….The one that bugs me the most is someone starting a Tweet with "BOOM!" as though some earth-shattering fact is being served up.
Get over yourself.
Also, describing "repeated tired old talking points and criticisms" as slammed, or eviscerated, etc.It’s about time to retire “Bombshell” in reference to news. It doesn’t mean a thing any longer.
I disagree because they analyze the same stuff over and over and over. I say stick with a time limit.Can I rewrite that? How about "Not for anything that's over 15 minutes old and that they've finished analyzing."
I attribute it's loss of interest to every bombshell of the last 5 years being duds.
The one that bugs me the most is someone starting a Tweet with "BOOM!" as though some earth-shattering fact is being served up.
Get over yourself.
"breaking news" has a real meaning. It's a thing.Nor does "Breaking News" which CNN has had running continuously in their chyron since 1992.