- Joined
- Sep 13, 2012
- Messages
- 18,233
- Reaction score
- 15,861
- Location
- veni, vidi, volo - now back in NC
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
He have, but the officer was not informed that he was, and there's no duty for a cop to become trained as a psychologist to diagnose such things in the field.The kid may have suffered from a mental illness...
True. Nor does your average criminal.they don't respond so logically in stressful situations.
Please provide a link to support your assertion that the cop went "... full auto and blast people..." I don't remember reading that.Perfect scenario for a cop to go full auto and blast people...
Victim of what? His own actions that led to him getting shot? That's not a victim. That was a dangerous criminal, that was shot by an officer that he was attacking with a bat. Victim? Seriously? :roll:and then BLAME THE VICTIM! :lol:
to be fair to the cop it's not his fault he was issued a gun.
He have, but the officer was not informed that he was, and there's no duty for a cop to become trained as a psychologist to diagnose such things in the field. True. Nor does your average criminal. Please provide a link to support your assertion that the cop went "... full auto and blast people..." I don't remember reading that.
Victim of what? His own actions that led to him getting shot? That's not a victim. That was a dangerous criminal, that was shot by an officer that he was attacking with a bat. Victim? Seriously? :roll:
Yes.A dangerous criminal?
Attacked his father with a deadly weapon, and then attacked the officer with the same weapon. That is a crime, and is dangerous - dangerous criminal.What had he done to warrant that title?
He had already attacked his father. The 911 operator told the officer the man had a bat and was attacking people. When he arrived on scene, the man attacked him with the bat. Second guessing an officer and demanding that he allow himself to be harmed so that he doesn't harm an attacker is just ridiculous and an unfounded expectation. Police officers do not have a duty to allow the public to harm them or to even attempt to harm them - they have every right to defend themselves, and this officer did just that.I can accept potentially dangerous but until he actually attacks the cop non-lethal force should be tried...
What?
Yes. Attacked his father with a deadly weapon, and then attacked the officer with the same weapon. That is a crime, and is dangerous - dangerous criminal. He had already attacked his father. The 911 operator told the officer the man had a bat and was attacking people. When he arrived on scene, the man attacked him with the bat. Second guessing an officer and demanding that he allow himself to be harmed so that he doesn't harm an attacker is just ridiculous and an unfounded expectation. Police officers do not have a duty to allow the public to harm them or to even attempt to harm them - they have every right to defend themselves, and this officer did just that.
Again... What?
Did I stutter?
Thought it was just me but no I did not stutter.
I read through the transcripts of the 911 call and don't remember the word "attack" at all and I don't believe cops most of the time. They lie when force is used most of the time.
Post the transcript, then.
Why is the burden on me to contradict what you are making up? Post the part that talks about an attack...
Why is the burden on me to contradict what you are making up? Post the part that talks about an attack...
Didn't actually read them? Okay, how about this, I'll just post the audio.
Please notice that the dispatcher states that a person called in that someone is threatening his life, that it appears to be a domestic, and that the person has a bat. Hard to understand the slurring, but here it is:
Okay then. Don't explain your comment, and let it stand on its own. You're the one that has to live with others reading it.
BTW, the burden is on you to support your claims. I never asked you to support mine. I am more than happy to do that myself.
This all would be a non issue had the cop used some good ole Hornady TAP Urban ammunition that does not over penetrate, but blows a big hole in the perp.
I will bet anyone a dozen doughnuts he was using cheaper 9mm ball ammo. That stuff over penetrates some rifle ammunition.
Just read up on this story again, to refresh my memory.
Yeah, I read it and nowhere in here does it talk about an attack.
Below is full text of Quintonio and Antonio LeGrier's 911 calls:
Q: "Can you please send the police?"
Dispatch: "To where?"
Q: "4710 West Erie Street."
Dis: "What's wrong?"
Q: "I have an emergency."
Dis: "I need to know what's wrong."
Q: "Someone is ruining my life."
Dis: "Who? Where are they now?"
Q: "There in the house."
Dis: "What's your name?
Q: "Q."
Dis: "Where are you going to be Q?"
Q: "Are you going to send the police?" *He mumbles what sounds like an obscenity after this*
Dis: "Are you at the house?"
*more obscenities*
Dis: "Hello?"
1:21 Q: "Are you going to send the police or not?"
Dis: "Are you going to answer my questions?"
Q: "How are you talking to?"
Dis: "I'm talking to you? If you can't answer the questions, how do you expect me to assist you?
Q: "I already told you I am at the house."
Dis: "No you didn't. You told me that person was at the house."
Dis: "Any weapons involved?"
Q: "Nah."
Dis" Where are you going to be?
*more obscenities*
2:30 Q: "Yeah I need an officer at 4710 West Erie Street."
Dis: "37 what?"
Q: "4710 West Erie Street."
Dis: "OK, what's wrong?"
Q: "I just need an officer over here, OK?"
Dis: "No, it don't work like that. What's your emergency?"
Q: "I need to talk to an officer."
Dis: "OK what's wrong."
Q: "I need to talk to an officer."
Dis: "You can talk to an officer over the phone. I can connect you with one if you would like."
Q: "Someone's ruining my life."
Dis: "Is the person there with you now?"
Q; "Yes."
Dis: "Are you in an apartment or a house?"
Q: "A house."
is: "And your name?
Q: "Q."
Dis: "What's your last name?"
: "Are you going to send an officer?"
Dis: 'Yeah when you answer the question."
Q: "There's an emergency, can you send an officer?"
Dis: "Yes, as soon as you answer the questions. What's your last name?"
Q: "THERE'S AN EMERGENCY."
Dis: "If you can't answer the question I am going to hang up."
Q: "I NEED THE POLICE."
Dis: "Terminate the call."
4:40 "My son has freaked out. I need an officer at 4710 West Erie. 4710 West Erie I need police assistance."
5:12 "He's got a baseball bat in his hand right now."
Dis: "How old is he?
Antonio: "19"
Dis: "Has he been drinking?"
Antonio: "No."
Dis: "What's your name sir?"
Antonio: "Antonio LeGrier"
Dis: "OK. Watch for the police."
In all fairness to me most of the thug cop supporters aren't capable of reading.
Do you know the difference between a dispatch and a 911 call? I gave you the dispatch which is what I was talking about. The cop was told that someone's life was in danger, it was a domestic (family member), and that a ball bat was involved by someone trying to get through a door. By any definition, that is an attack.
Clearly you didn't read up on the story, because you've thoroughly misrepresented it.
The real question is why did you misrepresent it?
Yes. I thought that is what you posted. Then it is the dispatchers fault that this occured because that idiot did not accurately relay the information...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?