• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

This thread is about FreeThinker. (1 Viewer)

Re: Tec's got some great........hospitality

Wait...he has wine to share???? :party

Girl, the man always has wine/beer/shots to share. He is imperative about having exactly what his guests would love having.
 
Last edited:
Re: This thread is about TECOYAH's Self-Righteous Self-Aggrandizing BS

Don't both of you feel bad about saying such mean things about another person? I mean, I'm not perfect. I've said mean things. But I don't think I was vicious like you two are being. What's the point? You know it has to make the other feel bad, do you enjoy that? Anyway, enough touchy-feely crap for the basement. Don't tell teach.

You are correct....Dammit. My apology to Felicity for allowing this to become personal. I know better.

tecoyah pours Dawg a glass of Blackberry Wine............And Kelzie an 82 Chateau Petrus
 
Re: Sheesh....AGREED.

Those that can't have an honest, look-you-in-the-eye discussion are the only ones who can't handle the man. I suspect they also can't handle many things dealing with reality.....
Uh...he's the one masquerading around as this subversive self-acclaimed "janitor" as if he's got some "authoritative role" in that make-believe title. That is not "look-you-in-the-eye" honest. It's DIShonest and snarky. HE admits it and he's proud of it. Fine. I think it's Nazi, as I said.

As for Mrs. T--I've had nothing bad to say about her--if anything, I've complimented her tolerance.

And ngdawg, the way you follow tecoyah around and lick up his droppings like he's your little whelp suckling at your teats--I'm not surprised “dawg” is part of your name and all that implies. Go have your threesome ("among other delightful things") with the janitor, the martyr, and the “queen ‘B’”--sounds like a helluva time.:2sick1:


tecoyah said:
You are correct....Dammit. My apology to Felicity for allowing this to become personal. I know better.
And also as noted, anyone who admits to playing gracious so he can underhandedly gain some sort of imagined passive aggressive superiority points can only be received with the sincerity of a gnat apologizing for being annoying.

An apology in the basement? Damn--that must be a first (for all that is worth, which is nil.):lol:
 
Last edited:
Re: This thread is about HONESTY

Kelzie--it's the basement. I've never posted here before, but I have a thing against Nazi tactics and have had enough of tecoyah's narcissistic two-faced bullsh1t. It may not be as abrasive to one who shares his political/social leanings. That's fine. At least there are no illusions as to what I really think of him--even if our mutual dislike means absolutely nothing to either of us.
 
Ain't nothing wrong with sucking 'teats'....you should be so lucky...:mrgreen:
As for honesty...look it up. Your claims of 'concern' in various posts were just self-imposed offsets to your baiting and trolling-poorly done at best, transparent at least. The 'poor lil ol me' ain't gonna cut it-never has, never will.
Truth is, even without the down and dirty, Tec made a valid point-your attempts to appear intelligent have failed miserably and you do have a penchant for sticking your nose into other people's business and making it your own. And when called on it, you cried 'attack'. "it's the way I talk"-no, we see the way you really talk, right in here...you got some 'Hail Marys' to do today.
What's wrong with having a friend or two? Who's the 'jealous one' now?
For all your claims about being such a good little Catholic, you negated everything and made yourself reveal the liar you really are. Just because you failed to see the tactics of Tec or anyone else doesn't make them the liars or 'attackers'-you're just too self-absorbed and unbright to know what you're dealing with. I believe it's called 'out of your league'...
 
Re: This thread is lame-o-ngdawg comebacks

Truth is, even without the down and dirty, Tec made a valid point-your attempts to appear intelligent have failed miserably
I find this absolutely hilarious from the woman who admits she has to look up half the words I use. Didja look up whelp? I thought about posting the dictionary.com link, but decided your flabby brain needed the exercise!

and you do have a penchant for sticking your nose into other people's business and making it your own. And when called on it, you cried 'attack'. "it's the way I talk"-no, we see the way you really talk, right in here...you got some 'Hail Marys' to do today.
Oh yeah...and the IVF threads were really all about YOU who didn't even have IVF...Spare me..:roll: Talk about a persecution complex. BTW--Don't you appreciate a bit of bitchiness from me as your friend does. I would think it would make you feel all warm and fuzzy about yourself.


What's wrong with having a friend or two? Who's the 'jealous one' now?
Friends like you two?--keep it. :rofl

For all your claims about being such a good little Catholic, you negated everything and made yourself reveal the liar you really are.
I'll admit that I have succumbed to failure to turn the cheek (finally), but even Jesus turned over a table or two in the temple when the hypocrites abused it.

Just because you failed to see the tactics of Tec or anyone else doesn't make them the liars or 'attackers'
No--but his admission does.

-you're just too self-absorbed and unbright to know what you're dealing with.
:2rofll: "unbright"!!! Too funny....how about "dull"?....your own written elocution speaks volumes of your "unbright"-ness.

I believe it's called 'out of your league'...
Yes...it's "little-league" and I've been out of it for a while now.:2wave:
 
Using big words doesn't make you smart-just snooty. Snooty usually just means stupid and clueless with the attitude you're neither.
I know more about IVF than you(and most other laypeople) do about it, and you continued to bait and troll, so STFU-and just admit you're ignorant. You made those threads in attempts to knock people who use the medical skills available, nothing more, because you're so freakin pompous. Clue: you're not the first to have a passel of kids and won't be the last. Be careful of that cheap pedestal you're standing on-I see cracks in it.
Don't flatter yourself...I couldn't care less about what you think of me...you're really just not that important, you don't even know how to be a real bitch.
Give me a call if you need lessons.
 
Ooo...big word.:applaud That "word a day" calendar really comes in handy, doesn't it!

BTW--if using big words makes one appear "snooty," --misusing big words only validates your "unbright"-ness....
as in "He is imperative about having exactly what his guests would love having."

you don't even know how to be a real bitch.
Give me a call if you need lessons.
Thanks...Will do--if I ever WANT to be a real bitch rather than fake being one on a website.:mrgreen: Don't hold your breath, I don't think it's really something to aspire to, unlike you and your ilk.
 
Last edited:
Is that the best you got? Big ***kin deal...I used 'he' instead of 'it'...Ooooo..guess I'm going to lingusitics hell now....Sheesh...you're even wasting your own time...don't you have sins to conquer or something?:roll:
 
...I used 'he' instead of 'it'...

It's just too easy:doh I can't even bring myself to correct you on this one...:2funny:
 
Actually, I don't mind Tashah calling me names and Bodi agreeing with it.
I called you on an outrageous lie. Deal with it graciously for once.

Whatever they want to think is fine with me. Whatever anyone wants to think, is fine with me. As long as they don't infringe upon my rights, they have the right to believe anything they want. Even if what they believe is dead wrong.
I've never infringed on your right to believe whatever you want. But I also have the right to point out your fallibility. An exercise in rudimentary tensor mathemetics comes to mind. Remember Billo?

For instance, it wasn't a lie on my part. There is enough evidence out there to indicate 9/11 was not an act of terrorism, but a military operation. Why am I lying for pointing this out? If Tashah wants to say something to the families of 9/11, why don't she talk about the Houston based law firm Baker-Botts, who is DEFENDING Saudi Arabia AGAINST the families of 9/11! I wonder if she can tell me who the "Baker" is in Baker-Botts? Quite frankly, with the amount of lies my government has put out, I have a little apprehension on just about everything they claim. Even when it comes to who was responsible for 9/11.
Quite frankly Billo, you are assiduously avoiding your statement that al-Qa'ida is a mythical organization. Rather than admit that you over-reached, you once again employ your signature fallback scapegoat - the government. The simple fact is... YOU characterized al-Qa'ida as mythical and YOU are simply too vainglorious to admit it as an incorrect and erroneous characterization.

Do we really know who did it? This does the following analysis make me a liar? Because that is what led to my making those statements she so vociferously objected too.
Yes we do know who did it. OBL proudly admitted the culpability of al-Qa'ida. The bipartisan 9/11 Commission also unanimously arrived at this conclusion.

I vociferously objected to one statement you made Billo... that al-Qa'ida is a mythical organization. A blatant lie that no amount of spin and damage control can remediate. Chalk it up to gratuitous over-reach and move on.
 
Originally posted by Tashah:
By the way Billo, your very own Poll numbers speak volumes. Terrible strategy.
You've obviously confused me with someone that wishes al Qaeda was a myth.
 
Originally posted by Tashah:
I called you on an outrageous lie. Deal with it graciously for once.
What was the lie?

Originally posted by Tashah:
I've never infringed on your right to believe whatever you want.
I thought that is what I just said.

Originally posted by Tashah:
But I also have the right to point out your fallibility. An exercise in rudimentary tensor mathemetics comes to mind. Remember Billo?
I'm as fallible as they come. And I certainly don't mind being taken to task on an issue. Just don't make up the conversation as you go along while ad-libbing my part. I'll handle that, if you don't mind.

Originally posted by Tashah:
Quite frankly Billo, you are assiduously avoiding your statement that al-Qa'ida is a mythical organization. Rather than admit that you over-reached, you once again employ your signature fallback scapegoat - the government. The simple fact is... YOU characterized al-Qa'ida as mythical and YOU are simply too vainglorious to admit it as an incorrect and erroneous characterization.
Why is this shades of GySgt? You're trying to stick me on a point I didn't make. And your conveniently leaving out the reason's why I said that. Only half of which is the government's "trustworthyness".

Originally posted by Tashah:
Yes we do know who did it. OBL proudly admitted the culpability of al-Qa'ida. The bipartisan 9/11 Commission also unanimously arrived at this conclusion.
Everything UBL said had to be translated. I'm not going to argue this point with you if you're so hell bent on continuing this little crusade of yours on false pretenses. Go to that poll you tried to shove in my face and see how I voted FOR al Qaeda being a myth, then get back to me.

Originally posted by Tashah:
I vociferously objected to one statement you made Billo... that al-Qa'ida is a mythical organization. A blatant lie that no amount of spin and damage control can remediate. Chalk it up to gratuitous over-reach and move on.
How someone who practically has a Ph.D can be so controlled by emotion, is beyond me. You should know better than to draw conclusions with a pre-disposition of the outcome.
 
Sorry. I'm not going to play your silly game. I have great faith in the core honesty and intellectual wisdom of my peers. They can easily decide for themselves exactly who was spinning what.
 
Originally posted by Tashah:
Sorry. I'm not going to play your silly game. I have great faith in the core honesty and intellectual wisdom of my peers. They can easily decide for themselves exactly who was spinning what.
The blame game is a little silly because you don't have the guts to stop lying to yourself. But it's a free world, have at it.
 
Originally Posted by Billo_Really
Actually, I don't mind Tashah calling me names and Bodi agreeing with it.

Billo, I was simply agreeing with her "calling you on it"...
Seriously, You know me enough by no to know that I would just trash you myself if I thought it warranted it. Tashah was just "keepin' it real" wit ya! ;)

Felicity

RoaR!

Woah girl! I have not seen this side of you before... :lol:

I think that insulting peoples better halves is lame, and you both have done that, but other than that, this has been a great read! Seriously... Thanks. :2razz:
 
Who else dragged other halves into the fray? Not that it's imperative....:mrgreen:

What an idiot she is.....

A command; an order.
An obligation; a duty: social imperatives.
A rule, principle, or instinct that compels a certain behavior: a people driven to aggression by territorial imperatives
 
Well, I just know that for me...if a person can't adequately burn me and defeat me without trying to burn my wife, as 1069 did, or my wife AND daughters, as galenrox did, then they are simply ****ing inbred retards...literally. To be serious is even worse, which they both contended by their actions and words. Just shows issues upon issues when a person is that lame. They lose with every word they utter, for they are losers.

I am not saying that Felicity is at a Lame-O level or anything, I won't do a drive-by insult on her...but I think that the tactic is weak when done at all, by anybody...

When others are ripping against another, since I don't know what they say, if anything, to each other on PM, so it could be just ripping. I don't assume that it is more serious than it is. But if it is serious when ripping on anothers family or whatever on the internet?... Holy **** that is pathetic. :lol:
 
Originally posted by BodiSatva:
Billo, I was simply agreeing with her "calling you on it"...
Seriously, You know me enough by no to know that I would just trash you myself if I thought it warranted it. Tashah was just "keepin' it real" wit ya!
Were cool Bodi. This ain't no big thing. She might think she's calling me on something, but a little off on this one. Granted, at first glance, I can see how she would jump to that conclusion. She goes a little awry by clinging on to that statement like the whole issue began and ended there. Even after I explained it to her. There's not much else I can do. Nor would I want too. People can think whatever they want to around me. The only time I draw the line, is when they start telling me what my point is.

FYI, there is enough information out there to argue the point that they were created as the enemy (not the literal organization) in order to help drive the Adminstrations global agenda. I don't want to argue that point here, I just wanted to explain why I said what I said. Which was a lead in to the thread I started right after I made the statement. My only point to Tashah was, how could I be lying when I have provided valid sources and links that explain the reasoning behind it.

Maybe I talk too much.
 
There's not much else I can do.
Sure there is. Move on.

I don't want to argue that point here, I just wanted to explain why I said what I said.
This isn't my idea. I was done with it and forgot it. I didn't author this Basement thread and drag you down here, Volker did. He attempted to trash my integrity here on the sly. The only reason you and I are down here at all is because of that dishonest amd manipulating little German weasel.

Which was a lead in to the thread I started right after I made the statement. My only point to Tashah was, how could I be lying when I have provided valid sources and links that explain the reasoning behind it. Maybe I talk too much.
I like you Billo. I am not here by design or choice. Perhaps your ire should be directed at the weasel who sits back and laughs at our expense.
 
Originally posted by Tashah:
Sure there is. Move on.
As in .org?

Originally posted by Tashah:
This isn't my idea. I was done with it and forgot it. I didn't author this Basement thread and drag you down here, Volker did. He attempted to trash my integrity here on the sly. The only reason you and I are down here at all is because of that dishonest amd manipulating little German weasel.
Actually, I was just passing thru and happened to see my name mentioned, so I stopped to check it out and have some fun.

Originally posted by Tashah:
I like you Billo. I am not here by design or choice. Perhaps your ire should be directed at the weasel who sits back and laughs at our expense.
To be quite honest, I haven't really paid too much attention to his posts. And the ones that I have, I didn't think they were that bad. And some of them, I actually agreed with.

With all that being said, I never been into that "White Nationalist" thing. I'm basically color blind. I find the whole race thing kind of ridiculous. I find it hard to believe any WN would not want to do the grind with Uzo from the Howard Stern show.

picture001aq7.jpg


I'll show you what a liar is. It is any white supremist who says they wouldn't want to hit that! She is just gorgeous. I met her at Howard's book signing in LA. I'd tell you a few stories about her and I, but I'd just be lying.
 
Who else dragged other halves into the fray? Not that it's imperative....:mrgreen:

What an idiot she is.....

A command; an order.
An obligation; a duty: social imperatives.
A rule, principle, or instinct that compels a certain behavior: a people driven to aggression by territorial imperatives
The English teacher in me gets the better of me...:roll: (I bothered since you didn't drop it.)

Okay...you're using it as a noun....Replace the word "imperative" in your sentence with any of those bold words above and you will see what is wrong.

Perhaps...
"He finds it an imperative to have exactly what his guests would love having."
~or~
"He views having exactly what his guests would love having as an imperative.""
~or~
"It is his imperative to have exactly what his guests would love having."

~NOT~
"He (or it) is imperative about..."

In this sentence you cannot use "imperative" as an adjective as you have it worded.

To use imperative as an adjective, you would say "He finds it imperative that he have exactly what his guests would love having."
 
When others are ripping against another, since I don't know what they say, if anything, to each other on PM, so it could be just ripping. I don't assume that it is more serious than it is. But if it is serious when ripping on anothers family or whatever on the internet?... Holy **** that is pathetic. :lol:

Well..as I said...I don't like him.
The wife thing was nothing about any bad traits she has *except having him* as a husband, and as noted--I said she was tolerant and undoubtedly a great actress. Those aren't exactly insults--they are compliments--albeit, smart-as$ed and not very sincere. Perhaps speculating about her "satisfaction" was beyond appropriate, but...I couldn't resist--again, it's not her that was any target of snideness--it's his overblown, self-righteous, condescending ego that I took aim at.

Anyway--It is just "ripping"--after all, this ain't the "real world" even if some people feel they play a "role" in this "community" --it's a freaking debate forum for Pete's sake--it's a "service" for entertainment purposes. To think otherwise reveals how pathetic one's real-life really is. I just came downstairs specifically because I have been goaded upstairs to a point where I believed if I didn't flex the backbone a little the assumption would be that the condescension and the basic as$holish-ness was tolerated and Felicity was just another doormat for these pathetic stall-muckers to wipe their irrelevant horse-sh!t on.

Tecoyah just served up a prime example of his crap on this thread and said he was basically proud of it--so I took the opportunity to be clear as to what I think of that sort of nasty-Nazi attempt at censorship on a forum that is supposed to be for all points of view.

Anyway, glad you enjoyed the read.:2wave:
 
:beatdeadhorse
I taught english too...
here's a clue: IT"S A FREAKIN ONLINE FORUM...get over yourself....I couldn't care less if my grammar here has errors....specially...oh...ONE:roll: sheesh...for someone who claims to have 'english teacher' in her, she sure has a difficult time understanding anything anyone says around here... or makes any sense
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom