-
This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
This is what "liberty" looks like.
- Thread starter Phys251
- Start date
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2012
- Messages
- 1,428
- Reaction score
- 854
- Location
- UK
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
douglas
Active member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2013
- Messages
- 458
- Reaction score
- 290
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Left
Your views on the abortion issue aside, can anyone agree with this woman's 1st amendment rights being denied? If the government has given themselves the power to silence anyone who disagrees with them, this is truly the end of American freedom.
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2013
- Messages
- 31,009
- Reaction score
- 9,029
- Location
- The Lone Star State.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
She'll probably get a call from Obama. 
FWIW, there were hundreds that spoke calmly, courteously and politely.
This is the reason there was a special session called.....belligerent, nasty Liberals.
FWIW, there were hundreds that spoke calmly, courteously and politely.
This is the reason there was a special session called.....belligerent, nasty Liberals.
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2011
- Messages
- 72,185
- Reaction score
- 43,982
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Victorian Prude and NYC will be a good fit. Maybe she's hoping to score her SAG card.
Here's what she has to say. I'd say watch the OP's vid clip first. Daily Kos: Interview with Victorian Prude the woman forcibly removed from testifying in Texas
Here's what she has to say. I'd say watch the OP's vid clip first. Daily Kos: Interview with Victorian Prude the woman forcibly removed from testifying in Texas
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2012
- Messages
- 14,673
- Reaction score
- 11,266
- Location
- NY
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
That's because they actually care about it and you don't.
Thrilla
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2011
- Messages
- 20,295
- Reaction score
- 9,801
- Location
- Texas, Vegas, Colombia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
that was one dumb chick... but she deserved to have her time at the Mic
Thrilla
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2011
- Messages
- 20,295
- Reaction score
- 9,801
- Location
- Texas, Vegas, Colombia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
on some issues, you might be correct, on other issues, you are way off the mark..... let's not pretend this fairyland where liberals or conservatives are paragons of liberty exists, it doesn't..
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2010
- Messages
- 60,458
- Reaction score
- 12,357
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
I would say that neither liberals or conservatives care about liberty, but they love to pick and choose things to give off the illusion that they do.
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2009
- Messages
- 65,981
- Reaction score
- 23,408
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Whether it was wrong to end her appearance before the committee is questionable in my opinion. Decorum can be imposed. So at what point could a person get up for 2 minutes and just rage obscenities and extreme accusations at other people?
I don't think that woman crossed the line, but she was racing towards it - so I don't see reason for total outrage at her time being concluded given how off her first personal attack was at one committee member. Requiring a sonogram - which I INTENSELY OPPOSE - does NOT cause a baby to be born blind or with STD eye infections - which was her accusation at one committee member. There also was her comment about "coming after you," for which a person making threats can be stopped from making more.
I do think the chair of a formal government session - at some point - can say "we don't have to take this crap from you anymore" to someone just raging hate obscenities or accusations off-the-chart in decorum and relevancy.
I don't think that woman crossed the line, but she was racing towards it - so I don't see reason for total outrage at her time being concluded given how off her first personal attack was at one committee member. Requiring a sonogram - which I INTENSELY OPPOSE - does NOT cause a baby to be born blind or with STD eye infections - which was her accusation at one committee member. There also was her comment about "coming after you," for which a person making threats can be stopped from making more.
I do think the chair of a formal government session - at some point - can say "we don't have to take this crap from you anymore" to someone just raging hate obscenities or accusations off-the-chart in decorum and relevancy.
Last edited: