- Joined
- Jun 6, 2014
- Messages
- 43,804
- Reaction score
- 8,673
- Location
- Flanders.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
For years I have been asking truthers for their full alternative 911 theory. None have been forthcoming.
Naturally. The truther schtick is to announce that if an official report (which they reframe as an official narrative) is true, then they personally would expect to see things A,B, and C in it. This is generally pulled from their colons. They then argue that because those things were not in the report, the report cannot be true. This then justifies rampant speculation.
When challenged on the complete lack of positive evidence for what they're saying, they treat the lack of that evidence as evidence of the conspiracy: the evidence for their theory isn't there because the conspirators hid it. (Remember truthers going on about how the WTC rubble was supposedly cleared away faster than they demanded, thereby 'proving' a coverup?).
Of course, many other truthers instead switch to simply insulting their questioners. This may be by announcing that the truther has superior analytic skills, or by naming the questioner a "sheep" for not questioning the official report instead.
The one thing they never do is say: this is what the conspiracy was, these are the goals it served, this his own it met those goals, this is who is in on it, and here is positive evidence that it was done, A,B,C --> Z.
Has Prager modeled the use of mini neutron bombs?
I'd love to see that. The funny bit is that a neutron bomb is designed to minimize blast damage and maximize neutron radiation in the immediate blast vicinity. It wasn't for blowing up buildings or anything like it. It was for wiping out divisions of troops, especially armored troops.
It would quite literally be the dumbest way to try to hide an intentional destruction of a building, especially the biggest buildings, in NYC.
No, it didn't explain it perfectly well, and you know it.
Many including AE911 have shown the many ways it fails.
For this layman, it fails because common sense demands that ALL the observed damage, including 3 months worth of molten iron, including the lateral ejection of massive pieces, including the many pictures taken by Kurt Sonnenfeld, could not possibly have been caused by gravity and office fires.
There is a reason Sonnenfeld became persona non grata. Like Edward Snowden, he told the truth.
The truth is what you and Mike, the government and the mainstream media, simply cannot handle.
Not to mention hiding the thousands and thousands of dead bodies in the area.
Well, yes, and probably tens of thousands more inexplicably dead in buildings a couple blocks away (compared to millions for a full-sized neutron bomb).
Think only three of the things were ever made but I could be wrong.
Yes, you many times dodge and post your unsupported claims. If asking questions that exposes the flaws and weakness in your belief is stirring the pot is really showing you know you have nothing to offer.
So I will ask again, who is correct. Gage/Jones or Prager?
You would rather sit in the dark and ignore the reality that you have been conned.
I don't give a GGD who is correct Mike. In fact, there are elements of truth in each man's analysis. I am an independent thinker more concerned with the Big Picture. Such analysis does not always require an either/or solution. Some do, some don't.
The over-riding point is that the official narrative is absurd and impossible from every perspective.
I was conned in 2001 just like you still are. I am able to admit how gullible I was, but that is brought into perspective by the fact that professional propagandists were and still are at work. Yes, it was a magnificently done deception, impossible without the bully pulpit of the state and its media.
Life goes on Mike. The truth DOES set one free.
Of course you don't! Just another excuse to cower behind so you don't have to answer to you absurd nuke theory that you believe in.I don't give a GGD who is correct Mike.
And there are elements that are incorrect/lies. But you're willing to overlook that right? I thought truthers were about the truth Thoreau72?In fact, there are elements of truth in each man's analysis.
More excuses to hide behind.I am an independent thinker more concerned with the Big Picture. Such analysis does not always require an either/or solution. Some do, some don't.
And part of the reason you believe this is because you believe in lies and incorrect information yet refuse to discuss them because you know they ARE absurd.The over-riding point is that the official narrative is absurd and impossible from every perspective.
What a crock!I was conned in 2001 just like you still are. I am able to admit how gullible I was, but that is brought into perspective by the fact that professional propagandists were and still are at work. Yes, it was a magnificently done deception, impossible without the bully pulpit of the state and its media.
Life goes on Mike. The truth DOES set one free.
I don't give a GGD who is correct Mike. In fact, there are elements of truth in each man's analysis. I am an independent thinker more concerned with the Big Picture. Such analysis does not always require an either/or solution. Some do, some don't.
The over-riding point is that the official narrative is absurd and impossible from every perspective.
I was conned in 2001 just like you still are. I am able to admit how gullible I was, but that is brought into perspective by the fact that professional propagandists were and still are at work. Yes, it was a magnificently done deception, impossible without the bully pulpit of the state and its media.
Life goes on Mike. The truth DOES set one free.
And this is the issue right here.Disbelief and ignorance of the engineering and physics is not a basis to speculate on explosive devices. And this is exactly what AE911T has been doing for more than a decade. Any explanation has to match the observations and data available.. regardless of how limited. There was no molten steel. And there were no steel columns forcibly ejected laterally. Asserting this is intellectually dishonest.
I don't give a GGD who is correct Mike. In fact, there are elements of truth in each man's analysis. I am an independent thinker more concerned with the Big Picture. Such analysis does not always require an either/or solution. Some do, some don't.
The over-riding point is that the official narrative is absurd and impossible from every perspective.
I was conned in 2001 just like you still are. I am able to admit how gullible I was, but that is brought into perspective by the fact that professional propagandists were and still are at work. Yes, it was a magnificently done deception, impossible without the bully pulpit of the state and its media.
Life goes on Mike. The truth DOES set one free.
How about the truth in YOUR "analysis"?In fact, there are elements of truth in each man's analysis. I am an independent thinker more concerned with the Big Picture.
The proper use of specially designed nuclear devices would also render boiling iron.
You can have your opinion and beliefs, no matter how misguided and wrong they are.
That applies to us all Mike.
Some opinions are informed and based on fact, while others are based upon falsehoods and propaganda, but yes, they are like elbows and belly buttons.
That applies to us all Mike.
Some opinions are informed and based on fact, while others are based upon falsehoods and propaganda, but yes, they are like elbows and belly buttons.
That applies to us all Mike.
Some opinions are informed and based on fact, while others are based upon falsehoods and propaganda, but yes, they are like elbows and belly buttons.
What I find interesting is that you are ok with cherry picking certain points from Prager's and AE911T. That means much of what else they say is false or misleading. No different than your opinion of the Government reports and other non government that came to the same conclusions.
Care to tell us how Rodriquez escaped without getting sick from radiation?
Instead of reading some author why not read the research reports written by those who did the studies. You will find that your nuke conclusion is wrong.
How about quit hiding and answer to your lies and misinformation Thoreau72? There are plenty.It is safe to say at this point, that you will never be able to comprehend how independent thinkers operate.
It is safe to say at this point, that you will never be able to comprehend how independent thinkers operate.
Still won't answer questions. It is safe to say at this point you will never understand where you went wrong.
You don't respond to people calling out your lies and incorrect information either. Let's be honest Thoreau72.For the most part, I don't respond to or answer poor quality questions.
For the most part, I don't respond to or answer poor quality questions.
You don't respond to people calling out your lies and incorrect information either. Let's be honest Thoreau72.
He cant admit he is wrong and cant defend his claims so he never ever will answer any questions about them
Truthers hate the truth
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?