He declared that he wan'ted to reject all immigrants of a certain faith, in BLATANT violation of the first amendment
He declared that all immigrants from our southern neighbor and ally, Mexico, were rapists and should be deported
He has not put forth one coherent economic plan
He wants the U.S military to commit war crimes
How the hell does anybody think he should be president?
Did you know first amendment rights are for US citizens, not people in other countries?
Since when?
He declared that all immigrants from our southern neighbor and ally, Mexico, were rapists and should be deported
He declared that he wan'ted to reject all immigrants of a certain faith, in BLATANT violation of the first amendment
He declared that all immigrants from our southern neighbor and ally, Mexico, were rapists and should be deported
He has not put forth one coherent economic plan
He wants the U.S military to commit war crimes
How the hell does anybody think he should be president?
He declared that he wan'ted to reject all immigrants of a certain faith, in BLATANT violation of the first amendment
He declared that all immigrants from our southern neighbor and ally, Mexico, were rapists and should be deported
He has not put forth one coherent economic plan
He wants the U.S military to commit war crimes
How the hell does anybody think he should be president?
When is the last time a person in another country claimed his first amendment rights?
You said U.S. citizens. Do non-citizens receive constitutional protections?
The first amendment includes more than free speech. It also includes language regarding establishment of religion. Rejecting someone solely on their faith would essentially be establishing government religion. At least that would be the argument.How is rejecting immigrants violating their free speech?
You're right that he didn't...but certainly the tone of his statement was far from appealing or forgiving and was certainly divisive.No he didn't.
I assume "coherent" many times will only be in the eye of the beholder. In other words, I agree this is a nothing argument from the OP.Neither has Hillary
Let's say he was...does that change from the fact Trump wants to waterboard?What war crimes? I assume waterboarding? BTW - Weren't you calling for the execution or re-education of all "right-wingers"?
You said U.S. citizens. Do non-citizens receive constitutional protections?
The first amendment includes more than free speech. It also includes language regarding establishment of religion. Rejecting someone solely on their faith would essentially be establishing government religion. At least that would be the argument.
You're right that he didn't...but certainly the tone of his statement was far from appealing or forgiving and was certainly divisive.
I assume "coherent" many times will only be in the eye of the beholder. In other words, I agree this is a nothing argument from the OP.
Let's say he was...does that change from the fact Trump wants to waterboard?
I don't think Donald Trump should be President. I don't really like the idea of Hillary Clinton as President. But that's the situation we find ourselves in.
Because, much like you were told when you were a youngster, two wrongs do not make a right.Ill agree to all of that with the exception of waterboarding. In fact the way I see it Radical Islam does not play by the rules of the Geneva convention nor is it part of the convention so I see no reason why we should not torture them.
Another failed ganapathy thread
Because, much like you were told when you were a youngster, two wrongs do not make a right.
On a more practical level, we have sufficient evidence to prove torture does not work in any meaningful way (indeed, it can hurt more than it helps) and engaging in such practices could encourage recruitment into terrorist groups.
Sorry when we have animals sawing off peoples heads with a dull knife and burning them alive in cages I tend not to care about right and wrong.
A) What about the practical reasons I mentioned?Sorry when we have animals sawing off peoples heads with a dull knife and burning them alive in cages I tend not to care about right and wrong.
Link to Trump saying that all immigrants from Mexico need to be deported? Like all of the ones here legally, and the ones who are by now citizens?
He declared that he wan'ted to reject all immigrants of a certain faith, in BLATANT violation of the first amendment
He declared that all immigrants from our southern neighbor and ally, Mexico, were rapists and should be deported
He has not put forth one coherent economic plan
He wants the U.S military to commit war crimes
How the hell does anybody think he should be president?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?