• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

These Three States Are Making a Trump Win Basically Impossible

You forget what you're dealing with. To a great many American conservatives, scientific polling is pseudoscience. It's just another in a long, LONG list of things that are Biased Against Conservatives.

Yeah, like that "theory" of evolution! :lamo
 
The debates have yet to happen. I think that is where trump is going to sink or swim.
There is nothing that Clinton can throw on him and with yet another FBI investigation
into her charity it is nothing more than bad news for her again.

both candidates are horrible and I am still thinking of voting 3rd party and I encourage everyone else
to vote that way as well.

there is no way anyone can honestly say they would support Clinton because she is ethical and honest.
if they are they are just as much of a liar as Clinton is.

Soon I won't be able to throw it for Trump anymore, perhaps even now, but I'm not taking any chances because if he did win I would be sorry for what I have done with this election.

When Hillary Clinton gets to appoint Supreme Court Judges the Republicans are going to ask themselves if when they decided to try to make Obama a one Term President, and their tactics, was it worth it?

Throw your vote away, vote so it hurts, vote for the Candidate that will hurt (make you feel like you threw your vote away) you the most. Don't vote for Trump, he will hurt you the most, vote for Jill Stein because then you don't rob Mrs. Clinton with a man.

Vote to make history by voting for the first woman President, her alternative or one of the other Candidates.

Vote so you can say that you voted in the last election before the great convergence (2020-2026.)
 
Last edited:
Soon I won't be able to throw it for Trump anymore, perhaps even now, but I'm not taking any chances because if he did win I would be sorry for what I have done with this election.

When Hillary Clinton gets to appoint Supreme Court Judges the Republicans are going to ask themselves if when they decided to try to make Obama a one Term President, and their tactics, was it worth it?

Throw your vote away, vote so it hurts, vote for the Candidate that will hurt (make you feel like you threw your vote away) you the most. Don't vote for Trump, he will hurt you the most, vote for Jill Stein because then you don't rob Mrs. Clinton with a man.

Vote to make history by voting for the first woman President, her alternative or one of the other Candidates.

Vote so you can say that you voted in the last election before the great convergence (2020-2026.)

I get so sick of hearing about the justices. All she does is gets to nominate someone it is up to the senate to confirm them.
If she picks a rogue liberal judge the senate doesn't approve. So she has to work with the senate to no I ate someone that will pass muster.
 
That's what they said about Truman.

The polls are just disinformation, in an attempt to cause Trump voters to stay home.

Nobody here was alive during Truman. Polls and methodology have come quite a way since Truman. Why don't you try joining technological advances from this century?
 
Nobody here was alive during Truman. Polls and methodology have come quite a way since Truman. Why don't you try joining technological advances from this century?

Historical events matter.
 
Well, they meant the world when they had Trump on top.

Now, they are just disinformation?

Yeah, there's some disinformation going on here but it ain't the polls.

I've never posted a poll. Maybe they meant the world to someone else.
 
Nobody here was alive during Truman. Polls and methodology have come quite a way since Truman. Why don't you try joining technological advances from this century?

True. And so has the methodology and collusion required to skew them.

TV News Feasts on Trump Controversies While Ignoring Hillary?s Scandals

MRC analysts reviewed all 1,099 stories on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts which talked about the presidential campaign between January 1 through June 7, including weekends. This tally includes 950 full reports and interview segments; 66 short items read by the anchor; plus 83 stories on other topics that included some discussion of one or more of the candidates.

The overall amount of campaign airtime is extraordinary: 2,137 minutes of coverage, or more than one-fourth (26.1%) of all evening news airtime during this period, excluding commercials and teases.

Nearly half of that airtime (1,068 minutes) was spent talking about Donald Trump, the presumptive GOP nominee, compared to 583 minutes of coverage for Hillary Clinton. Clinton’s rival for the Democratic nomination, Vermont socialist Bernie Sanders, came in third, with 366 minutes of coverage, more than any of Trump’s GOP rivals.

Compared to Clinton, a much higher percentage of Trump’s airtime (40 percent, or 432 minutes) was spent discussing the controversies surrounding the Republican’s candidacy. Only 18 percent of Clinton’s coverage (105 minutes) was spent discussing similar controversies, as network reporters paid scant attention to stories that would have garnered far more airtime had Trump been involved.

For example, the lingering questions about Clinton’s handling of the 2012 Benghazi attack drew only 77 seconds of evening news airtime from January 1 through June 7. Clinton’s participation in a racially-charged comedy skit with New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (about running on CP time — “cautious politician time”) was skipped by ABC and NBC’s evening broadcasts, getting just 51 seconds of airtime on the April 12 edition of the CBS Evening News.​
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...g-a-trump-win-basically-impossible/?tid=sm_Fb

Sorry, Trumpeteers.

Four new NBC News/Marist College polls released Friday show Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton leading her Republican rival by five points in Florida, nine points in North Carolina and double digits in Colorado (14) and Virginia (13). All four states have been battlegrounds in recent presidential elections.

That's just the Vast LeftWing Voter Conspiracy in action. The Voting Elite will do anything to undermine Trump
 
True. And so has the methodology and collusion required to skew them.

TV News Feasts on Trump Controversies While Ignoring Hillary?s Scandals

MRC analysts reviewed all 1,099 stories on the ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts which talked about the presidential campaign between January 1 through June 7, including weekends. This tally includes 950 full reports and interview segments; 66 short items read by the anchor; plus 83 stories on other topics that included some discussion of one or more of the candidates.

The overall amount of campaign airtime is extraordinary: 2,137 minutes of coverage, or more than one-fourth (26.1%) of all evening news airtime during this period, excluding commercials and teases.

Nearly half of that airtime (1,068 minutes) was spent talking about Donald Trump, the presumptive GOP nominee, compared to 583 minutes of coverage for Hillary Clinton. Clinton’s rival for the Democratic nomination, Vermont socialist Bernie Sanders, came in third, with 366 minutes of coverage, more than any of Trump’s GOP rivals.

Compared to Clinton, a much higher percentage of Trump’s airtime (40 percent, or 432 minutes) was spent discussing the controversies surrounding the Republican’s candidacy. Only 18 percent of Clinton’s coverage (105 minutes) was spent discussing similar controversies, as network reporters paid scant attention to stories that would have garnered far more airtime had Trump been involved.

For example, the lingering questions about Clinton’s handling of the 2012 Benghazi attack drew only 77 seconds of evening news airtime from January 1 through June 7. Clinton’s participation in a racially-charged comedy skit with New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (about running on CP time — “cautious politician time”) was skipped by ABC and NBC’s evening broadcasts, getting just 51 seconds of airtime on the April 12 edition of the CBS Evening News.​

Gee, I remember when all the Trumpettes bragged about how the media spent so much time talking about Trump and how Trump's#'s went up everytime they did. They claimed Trump was a genius who was playing the media

Now, it's why he's doing so poorly
 
Gee, I remember when all the Trumpettes bragged about how the media spent so much time talking about Trump and how Trump's#'s went up everytime they did. They claimed Trump was a genius who was playing the media

Now, it's why he's doing so poorly


I don't remember anyone bragging. Please provide examples.
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...g-a-trump-win-basically-impossible/?tid=sm_Fb

Sorry, Trumpeteers.

Four new NBC News/Marist College polls released Friday show Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton leading her Republican rival by five points in Florida, nine points in North Carolina and double digits in Colorado (14) and Virginia (13). All four states have been battlegrounds in recent presidential elections.

Good morning Rocket,

This must be fast breaking news, since your thread title identifies three states and your content identifies four :2razz: I'm guessing, before the election runs out, it will be more than a dozen states in this category.

One silver lining for conservatives - the worse Trump does in these polls, the less likely that the soft Hillary support will bother to come out to vote for her. As a result, that will play to the advantage of Republicans down ticket who are seeking election or reelection in the Senate and House. Conservatives and Republicans know that their only hope now is to secure the Senate against Clinton and even force a constitutional crisis to ensure the Supreme Court isn't stacked with nanny state meddlers.
 
Trump has already plowed through several events deemed "impossible" by the pundits. Winning the popular vote in the primary; securing enough delegates to make his win iron-clad; getting past the RNC establishment who was going to pull every dirty trick in the book to make someone else the candidate.



One might think that saying "impossible" to Trump is premature.
 
Says the poster who just claimed there's a media conspiracy to get Trump

Of course the media is working against Trump. That's obvious. How else would a poll come out that has Clinton 14 points ahead, in a state that a liberal hasn't won since 1976? Think about it: what does Clinton have to offer that South Carolinians want? More taxes? Gun control? Fewer jobs? I just don't see liberalism selling well in South Carolina.
 
That's what they said about Truman.

The polls are just disinformation, in an attempt to cause Trump voters to stay home.

I mostly posted this after the nationwide poll showed Trump within striking distance had all the Trumpeteers here crowing. Of course, nationwide polls don't mean a thing if you understand how the President is elected. Polls in key states do.

Your Messiah has an uphill climb.
 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...g-a-trump-win-basically-impossible/?tid=sm_Fb

Sorry, Trumpeteers.

Four new NBC News/Marist College polls released Friday show Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton leading her Republican rival by five points in Florida, nine points in North Carolina and double digits in Colorado (14) and Virginia (13). All four states have been battlegrounds in recent presidential elections.

If these hold - there simply is NO path to electoral college victory for Trump.

And that is a very good thing for America.
 
Of course the media is working against Trump. That's obvious. How else would a poll come out that has Clinton 14 points ahead, in a state that a liberal hasn't won since 1976? Think about it: what does Clinton have to offer that South Carolinians want? More taxes? Gun control? Fewer jobs? I just don't see liberalism selling well in South Carolina.

Sanity.
 
That's what's so depressing. No matter which one wins, we're screwed. So, do we want the family that takes donations with one hand while handing out government largesse with the other or do we want the nitwit who says there is no such thing as too greedy? Either way, we're screwed.
 
Back
Top Bottom