• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

The Washington Post finally admits it's Hunter's laptop, too

NatMorton said:
What makes you think we have no idea after reading the message's "from" field?
Click to expand...
Because the computer was in the hands of lots of people. Any of them could have written them
 
vegas giants said:
Because the computer was in the hands of lots of people. Any of them could have written them
Click to expand...
That's a different matter. When the message reads "From: Hunter" we have an idea who wrote it. Yes, that idea may require verification, but we are not at a loss to make an educated guess.
 
NatMorton said:
That's a different matter. When the message reads "From: Hunter" we have an idea who wrote it. Yes, that idea may require verification, but we are not at a loss to make an educated guess.
Click to expand...
No we dont. Anyone who had the computer could have written that
 
NatMorton said:
Yes, the willful ignorance you're displaying on this matter does amuse.
Click to expand...
I accept your concession that the reason the fbi cant find a crime is there is no evidence of one
 
so now we see the propaganda apparatus going into red alert.
"damage control!" "damage control!" "Danger Will Robinson!!"

wow there MUST be something to this story after all.
 
vegas giants said:
No we dont. Anyone who had the computer could have written that
Click to expand...

And one of Josh Duggar's employees was the one accessing child porn, right?
 
B...b...b...but Hunter's not the President. This means nothing. Where's your proof? Have you actually seen the messages? We have no idea who wrote those messages! Hunter doesn't have security clearance. You don't know he's guilty. There couldn't possibly be other copies of sent and receives messages that could proof authenticity! You can't prove intent because Hunter's a drug attic. It could still be faux news. That this story has been reported on after a year of ignoring it proves there's no liberal media bias. It's been debunked already. What about Trump? ...

(Thought I'd again post the Cliffs Notes version of the high comedy offered to explain away the messages on Hunter's laptop.)
 
NatMorton said:
source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...ns-laptop-real-nine-months-received-copy.html

And there are still people here on DP who are clinging to the idea that the information is false. It's like they're in a bad relationship with last year's propaganda. It's time to move on.

Back to the story, it is, IMO, way too coincidental that both The Times and Post would quietly acknowledge their earlier misinformation within a couple of weeks of each other. There's something brewing, and one explanation that fits the facts is one I cited in another thread: there's some big revelation coming from the data on that laptop and the these DNC ... err ... media outlets are attempting to get ahead of the story.

Watch this space.
Click to expand...
Okay, so link to the Washington Post article rather than The Daily Fail.
 
The entire contents of that hard drive could have been written by a dozen people
 
vegas giants said:
I accept your concession that the reason the fbi cant find a crime is there is no evidence of one
Click to expand...
And I accept as an absurdity your ridiculous implied assertion that copies of the messages on Hunter's laptop don't exist on other devices that could be subpoenaed to verify authenticity of those messages.
 
NatMorton said:
And I accept as an absurdity your ridiculous implied assertion that copies of the messages on Hunter's laptop don't exist on other devices that could be subpoenaed to verify authenticity of those messages.
Click to expand...
Yet the fbi felt no need to issue a subpoena because no crimes were found


Dismissed
 
NatMorton said:
At what point do you folks wake up to the fact that a GOP-led House could become a kind of grand jury if it spins up an impeachment probe?
Click to expand...
Yaaaaaawn

Go for it. Lol
 
Josie said:
Um ... the one meeting about this case right now.

No..................................... the grand jury decides if there should be an indictment.
Click to expand...
Which grand jury is meeting now?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom