We should encourage all law abiding citizens to qualify with and then own an assault rifle.
Just give me a legal lower receiver. I'll take care of it from there.We should encourage all law abiding citizens to qualify with and then own an assault rifle.
Yeah because you never know when Canada or Mexico will launch an invasion.We should encourage all law abiding citizens to qualify with and then own an assault rifle.
Times change.Yeah because you never know when Canada or Mexico will launch an invasion.
A citizen army is the guarantor of democracy.I have never heard anyone argue the population should be armed to protect the state.
You watch too many bad movies. If, and that's about as big an 'if' as an 'if' can get, the US military ever had to defend the continental United States a bunch of armed civilians trying to be involved would be a nightmare for the professional soldiers.Times change.
When they eventually win this struggle. (And I believe they will.) They will cherish their democracy and never allow autocrats or charlatans peddling dissention threaten them again. Something we have forgotten.i've been impressed that the Ukraine has defended their country with only rifles and handguns.
that's all they need. it's why i've been so confused about a no fly zone and weapons to stop tanks and all that other stuff they're asking for. they have all they need already.
Where is qualify with in the second amendment?We should encourage all law abiding citizens to qualify with and then own an assault rifle.
Hope so because they may not get that help.i've been impressed that the Ukraine has defended their country with only rifles and handguns.
that's all they need. it's why i've been so confused about a no fly zone and weapons to stop tanks and all that other stuff they're asking for. they have all they need already.
We should encourage all law abiding citizens to qualify with and then own an assault rifle.
Great post!A citizen army is the guarantor of democracy.
The militia clause.Where is qualify with in the second amendment?
You seem unable to understand positions that you don't agree with, with ignorant comments. His comment is not ignorant at all. The bullshit you post on this subform is oozing ignorance with a bit of dishonesty and trolling thrown in for good measure. Now I need a good laugh-tell us why his opinion is "ignorant"? that you have a hatred of legal gun owners is not a valid argumentWhy posts such ignorant things?
Does it "happy" you in some way?
So you believe training is REQUIRED by the second amendment?The militia clause.
Common sense. You are seeing it in real time.Why posts such ignorant things?
Does it "happy" you in some way?
"Militia" indicates some proficiency with arms. How it is gained is not detailed, but I'm sure we could do some historical research and figure it out.So you believe training is REQUIRED by the second amendment?
But it implies it is REQUIRED. How else without at least a test?"Militia" indicates a some proficiency with arms. How it is gained is not detailed, but I'm sure we could do some historical research and figure it out.
In fact, I am the smart one. The one that understands both sides of the issues.You seem unable to understand positions that you don't agree with, with ignorant comments. His comment is not ignorant at all. The bullshit you post on this subform is oozing ignorance with a bit of dishonesty and trolling thrown in ..
Common sense. You are seeing it in real time.
"Militia" indicates some proficiency with arms. How it is gained is not detailed, but I'm sure we could do some historical research and figure it out.
I have long advocated for gun owners to be vetted the same as concealed carry.But it implies it is REQUIRED. How else without at least a test?
We should encourage all law abiding citizens to qualify with and then own an assault rifle.