- Joined
- Jun 18, 2021
- Messages
- 5,242
- Reaction score
- 6,971
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
There's your fatal flaw.law abiding citizens
There's your fatal flaw.law abiding citizens
Then you demand gun control not seen in almost any state in the unionI have long advocated for gun owners to be vetted the same as concealed carry.
Which ones do you break?Who obeys all laws?
Which ones do you break?
I am a moderate and own many guns. I believe in a reasonable interpretation of the second amendment. I am not an extremist of the left or right.Then you demand gun control not seen in almost any state in the union
Some would say you are a gun control extremist
Violently?The US Constitution, to name one.
You demand proficiency testing just to own a gunI am a moderate and own many guns. I believe in a reasonable interpretation of the second amendment. I am not an extremist of the left or right.
Well actually, that was literally the entire reason for the 2nd Amendment. The idea the founders had was that the United States would not have a standing army, but rather would have to depend upon its citizenry to defend the country. That was to be a check against a corrupt government as the citizens would only defend a responsive government.I have never heard anyone argue the population should be armed to protect the state.
As apposed to the United States?Just as an aside, it's not "the" Ukraine, it's just Ukraine.
I want people to know how to use a chainsaw if they own one.You demand proficiency testing just to own a gun
That is extremist by every measure
Do you demand proficiency testing there too?I want people to know how to use a chainsaw if they own one.
Either could be used for USA. It is a conglomeration of states, while Ukraine is simply a country. No one says "the Mexico" or "the Russia" or "the Germany".As apposed to the United States?
If you are going to use it around me, yes.Do you demand proficiency testing there too?
i do think they'll win with rifles and handguns.When they eventually win this struggle. (And I believe they will.) They will cherish their democracy and never allow autocrats or charlatans peddling dissention threaten them again. Something we have forgotten.
no one can tell if you are, because you post childish trolling nonsense that makes stupid claims and rarely addresses the subject of the thread.In fact, I am the smart one. The one that understands both sides of the issues.
Violently?
what?Hope so because they may not get that help.
Nope. It could be required by 10 USC 246, but that would be for all males age 17-44, not just gun owners. I'd love to see the mitia mustered.So you believe training is REQUIRED by the second amendment?
That would be unconstitutional.I have long advocated for gun owners to be vetted the same as concealed carry.
You can be in the militia with zerro competence.But it implies it is REQUIRED. How else without at least a test?
I agree. My usage was for a region without formal borders, that is no longer correct. I will be more careful.Either could be used for USA. It is a conglomeration of states, while Ukraine is simply a country. No one says "the Mexico" or "the Russia" or "the Germany".
That is all the continental army had.what?
handguns and rifles are all they need to battle an army.
works for presidents too, it appearsYou can be in the militia with zerro competence.
At least zero training.works for presidents too, it appears