- Joined
- Dec 5, 2009
- Messages
- 23,246
- Reaction score
- 17,620
- Location
- Indiana
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
If you ever grow up, maybe you'll actually find out.
If you ever grow up, maybe you'll actually find out.
You ignore everything he did and focus on one thing, it's unfortunate.The investigations his accusers wanted could never deliver any evidence Trump colluded with the Russians. As much as you blaabing wanted it to. lol
When you make assumptions...............No one mentioned sagacity. A sage is someone with wisdom and bombast.
Obviously, you missed Trump's four years dominated by his popularity. He isn't sagacious, just popular.
YOu know, like Obama who had no accomplishments to speak of other than Obamcare. You spared yourself the embarrassment of being a hero worshiper. If you lived here you would have voted for him.
I wouldn't expect a Liberal like you to vote for Bush, Romney, or Trump, or DeSantis.When you make assumptions...............
Now, if it one of them or trump....I wouldn't expect a Liberal like you to vote for Bush, Romney, or Trump, or DeSantis.
I distract you by asking you a simple question? Where do you find truth in the media?I'm accusing him of being willing to lie to you for money, and yet you still let him do it.
And I told you why. The answer to that is irrelevant to the discussion.
Fox is willing to lie to you for money, and yet you still let them do it. That doesn't change no matter where I get my news. Your question seems to be little more than an attempt to distract me, but it won't work.
I think his opposition has enough of its own corruption to worry about.You ignore everything he did and focus on one thing, it's unfortunate.
Even on that issue, he obstructed justice, he openly praised Putin, Russia if you're listening.....Russia loved on Trump, and Trump loved on Russia. They did it out in the open...they shouldn't have had to prove anything, Republicans should have rejecting him just for what he did publicly. His use of criminals in his campaign, Paul Manafort feeding information to KK, putting Michael Flynn back into the highest levels of government? Give me a break.
Watergate..>Republicans illegally breaking into DNC
2016 - Russia illegally steals the Democratic opponents emails and sees that they are released to the public.
2020 - Trump trying to interfere in the election at numerous levels
What a dirty enterprise.
It still amazes me how ignorant some people are when they make assumptions. BUT you are right, I wouldn't have. Of course, being Canadian, I couldn't have voted for any of the above. BTW, I voted for a Conservative here in Canada. Doug Ford in Ontario. But you keep on making assumptions, because it helps you justify YOUR position.I wouldn't expect a Liberal like you to vote for Bush, Romney, or Trump, or DeSantis.
Imagine that. Someone offering opinions with the expressed goal of supporting one's position. Am I strange, or what?It still amazes me how ignorant some people are when they make assumptions. BUT you are right, I wouldn't have. Of course, being Canadian, I couldn't have voted for any of the above. BTW, I voted for a Conservative here in Canada. Doug Ford in Ontario. But you keep on making assumptions, because it helps you justify YOUR position.
UnintelligibleNow, if it one of them or trump....
Well the Dominion Lawsuit hasn't even gone to trial yet, so all we have there are accusations at this point. But far be it from lefties to not report said accusations as fact. lol
Where did Hannity claim the election was stolen? I don't see any evidence in your link that he ever said that.
Rupert Murdoch testified, per your link, "Fox Corp Chairman Rupert Murdoch acknowledged under oath that some Fox hosts "endorsed" the notion" Endorsed the Notion. Lmao Hardly reporting as fact.
One group is clearly lying outright at every turn, but it isn't Fox. It's you all, based on your own sources that you provide.
Hannity in private texts with Kayleigh McKinenny: "No more stolen election talk"I distract you by asking you a simple question? Where do you find truth in the media?
You're only being lied to if you don't recognize the lie.
Hannity in private texts with Kayleigh McKinenny: "No more stolen election talk"Hannity in private texts with Kayleigh McKinenny: "No more stolen election talk"
Hannity on the air: State legislatures “need to get working now” to fix the voting and election certification process.
'No More Stolen Election Talk': New Texts Show Sean Hannity Was Desperate to Keep Trump Quiet After Jan. 6
The Jan. 6 committee released new text messages showing how desperate Sean Hannity was to prevent Trump from pushing the Big Lie.www.rollingstone.com
Sworn testimony under oath:
Powell told Hannity then that there was widespread fraud in the 2020 election and that voting machines manufactured by Dominion Voting Systems helped steal the election by switching votes. “I did not believe it for one second,” Hannity said in the released deposition, according to the Times.
Sean Hannity admits in deposition he didn’t believe Trump voter fraud claims
Fox News host Sean Hannity admitted under oath that he “did not believe” for “one second” there was mass voter fraud in the 2020 election. Hannity’s testimony was incl…thehill.com
And when asked why Fox continues to give a platform to Lindell—who continues to this day to spout lies about Dominion — Murdoch agreed that “It is not red or blue, it is green.”
MSN
www.msn.com
Text messages submitted as physical evidence:
"Sidney Powell is lying by the way. I caught her. It's insane," he wrote to Ingraham on November 18. Several days later, he called Powell "a nut" and told his colleague he had to "try to make the [White House] disavow her, which they obviously should have done long before."
Heinrich said that "top election infrastructure officials" had found there to be "no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised."
"Please get her fired," Carlson told Hannity. "Seriously...What the f***? I'm actually shocked....It needs to stop immediately, like tonight. It's measurably hurting the company. The stock price is down. Not a joke."
Five bombshells in Tucker Carlson's texts about election
From admitting Trump should concede to trying to get another reporter fired for fact-checking Trump, here are five bombshells from the newly released texts.www.newsweek.com
--------
They knew the truth behind the scenes but told you lies on the air. Heinrich had the audacity to call AZ for Biden, which was the truth, and Tucker wanted to have her fired for it.
Baloney. Right after Matt Gaetz said that Trump won the election, Hannity responds to that by stating the state legislatures need to get working now. That had nothing to do with how long it takes to count votes, as you've attempted to whitewash here, and everything to do with agreeing with Matt Gaetz that Trump won the election but it was stolen.Hannity in private texts with Kayleigh McKinenny: "No more stolen election talk"
Hannity on air: State legislatures “need to get working now” to fix the voting and election certification process.
The process does need fixed. It shouldn't takes days and days. No where is he saying it's stolen.
Baloney. Carlson is still saying that the election was stolen, to this day.The claim Tucker pushed stolen election on air will easily be proven wrong as Tucker clearly said on air there was no evidence to support election fraud in November when he's accused of the opposite.
I've been "told" about the existence of their texts and sworn testimony under oath, and I can read and understand them for myself. Can you?All of you people have one thing in common, the only thing you know about these accusations is what you're told
Baloney. Right after Matt Gaetz said that Trump won the election, Hannity responds to that by stating the state legislatures need to get working now. .............. Okay fair enough. Now prove that means what you claim it means because it's so open to interpretation anyone can say it means all sorts of things. But when you consider what Hannity is on record saying publicly at the same time, no reasonable person would interpret that to be what you wish it to be.Baloney. Right after Matt Gaetz said that Trump won the election, Hannity responds to that by stating the state legislatures need to get working now. That had nothing to do with how long it takes to count votes, as you've attempted to whitewash here, and everything to do with agreeing with Matt Gaetz that Trump won the election but it was stolen.
Baloney. Carlson is still saying that the election was stolen, to this day.
In a segment on 6 March that sought to downplay the attack on the US Capitol on 6 January, 2021, Tucker Carlson said rioters were “right” to believe that the election was “unfairly conducted”.
“The protesters were angry. They believed that the election they had just voted in had been unfairly conducted. And they were right. In retrospect, it is clear that the 2020 election was a grave betrayal of American democracy,” he stated. “No honest person can deny it.”
Tucker Carlson revives election lies while Fox News faces lawsuit over bogus claims
Court documents reveal Fox News star rejected debunked 2020 claims while fearing drops in stock prices and viewership if the network publicly admitted there is no evidence to support themwww.independent.co.uk
I've been "told" about the existence of their texts and sworn testimony under oath, and I can read and understand them for myself. Can you?
No matter how many CTs you believe in, Sean Hannity clearly agreed with Matt Gaetz on-air that Trump won the election. Tucker stated that the "protestors" were angry because they believed that Trump won the election, and he said they were right. They lied to you.Baloney. Right after Matt Gaetz said that Trump won the election, Hannity responds to that by stating the state legislatures need to get working now. .............. Okay fair enough. Now prove that means what you claim it means because it's so open to interpretation anyone can say it means all sorts of things. But when you consider what Hannity is on record saying publicly at the same time, no reasonable person would interpret that to be what you wish it to be.
Tucker Carlson said rioters were “right” to believe that the election was “unfairly conducted”. ............Once again, your own evidence shows he did not say what you claim he said. He is on record saying the exact opposite though, which provides further evidence in direct contradiction of your interpretations and pathetically weak claims.
“The protesters were angry. They believed that the election they had just voted in had been unfairly conducted. And they were right. In retrospect, it is clear that the 2020 election was a grave betrayal of American democracy,” he stated. “No honest person can deny it.” ............I agree. You can't push out poll watchers, paper over windows and count ballots and claim you're fairly conducting. I am right, it is clear. This is just one example why I feel half of the country was betrayed unfairly. And I am justly right to be angry. Once again, your own evidence does not show what you claim. Regardless of how many lying Fox haters tell you it does.
That's your problem, you can't make a clear case to support a single accusation you make. I have no CT. Just facts supported by clear evidence.No matter how many CTs you believe in, Sean Hannity clearly agreed with Matt Gaetz on-air that Trump won the election. Tucker stated that the "protestors" were angry because they believed that Trump won the election, and he said they were right. They lied to you.
You know exactly what I meant. Sorry if i offended your delicate sensibilities with a typo.Unintelligible
That's your problem, you can't make a clear case to support a single accusation you make. I have no CT. Just facts supported by clear evidence.
Quite the oppositeAfter reading this thread, your entire shtick here is playing sematics with what is clearly stated by Hannity, Carlson, Murdoch, etc.
*and amateur gaslighting ^^Quite the opposite
I'm emotionally devastated.You know exactly what I meant. Sorry if i offended your delicate sensibilities with a typo.
No, they are characterized by wisdom, prudence, and good judgmentA sage is someone with wisdom and bombast.
You responded to my allegation that the MSM did not adequately cover the non-peaceful protests by claiming that the MSM provided "24/7" coverage. This ignores the role that Leftist punditry played in that "coverage" by validating the protests in order to sell the systemic racism favored by the Left. Your blanket statement about Fox News in this very post (see below) applies just as well to the MSM.Now you've completely lost me. How is my description of the coverage of the summer riots somehow a blanket statement about Fox News?
Yes, most cable news has slanted bias. Few MSM has as much hateful rhetoric as Fox.
It's an example, as is Don Lemon, of a species of slanting that you may not have perceived.Are you suggesting I'm wrong because of one guy named Sanchez?
Does she still post her sources on her website?I used to enjoy Rachel Maddow.
Knowing it was confirmation bias.
Then I caught her taking a conservative speaker’s words out of context, which I knew because it was discussed here earlier in the day.
I watched for days for a correction, which I had seen from her before. None came.
I no longer watch Rachel maddow.
Simple as that.