- Sep 18, 2008
- Reaction score
- Political Leaning
Oh? So these posts will identify the "rights" you claim have been "lost" and will specify how they were lost? Okay, I'll go re-read those posts.Been there already, Go back to posts 265 and 266 of this thread... there's also more than 20!!! sources of information there... mainly news sites, videos of Bush and his administration, AND links to the the patriot acts themselves.
No, no, and no...
Sorry, but mere claims of rights being lost are not representative of arguments demonstrating such a loss.
In other words, all you have is someone else (yes, I know you're cribbing your posts here) claiming that some right was lost. That's a claim, not an argument.
Sorry, but a draft of Patriot II does not demonstrate that Bush is guilt of "treason," "fraud," or any "lesser crime" as you assert.
Oh, "Other Sources", like blood draws by local cops...bwahahahahahahahahaaaaaaa!!!Title 3 : Enhancing Investigations of Terrorist Plots
Subtitle A : Terrorism Identification Database
Section 302: Collection and Use of Identification Information from Suspected Terrorists and Other Sources
Now we know that your integrity is completely shot. No reasonable can draw from that that it represents cops doing roadside blood draws.
No. YOU made a claim. Now specify the specific provisions supporitng that claim.
You are merely cribbing what someone else has already said about these provisions. I am sure that they cite specific sections....just copy and paste their whole argument will ya so we can stop playing these games...
Nope.Or were you just skimming through the posts waiting for me to say something that wasn't sourced??
And, sorry, but demanding that someone read an entire bill and somehow divine what specifically you meant would lead to your, errr, the somebody else's conclusion, that you pasted here is unreasonable.
Prove your points. Do it with specific citations.
Ignore what? Your repeated references that lacked any specificity whatsoever? Yeah, I saw those.I mean, did you choose to ignore those posts just so you could come up with this sort of argument??
You do realize that it is your obligation to prove your points, right?
Done.Remember, Posts 265 and 266 then get back to me.
Those posts do not prove what you claimed.
Mere speculation doesn't count for anything. Especially not when we see that your speculation that "Other Sources" would supposedly imply raodside blooddraws by cops.