Until Texas and some of the other reich-wing states have fair un-gerrymandered districts your side has no room to bitch.Any political party that has drawn up voting districts like the ones in Illinois, really has no room to bitch.
Until Texas and some of the other reich-wing states have fair un-gerrymandered districts your side has no room to bitch.
Stop the duck tactics.
This is a good point.You're right in a way. Whatever room to bitch either of the two major sides might have had, is narrowing quickly. It's amusing. I kinda view it like professional wrasslin'. The politicians perform as faces or heels, and the partisans cheer for more blood.
224. Voting Rights: We support equal suffrage for all United States citizens of voting age. We oppose any identification of citizens by race, race, origin, creed, sexuality, or lifestyle choices, and oppose use of any such identification for purposes of creating voting districts. We urge that the Voting Rights Act of 1965, codified and updated in 1973, be repealed and not reauthorized.
This is nothing more than a tool of racists.From the 2024 Texas GOP platform:
The Texas GOP has openly called for elimination of the Voting Rights Act. While the national party has not said that part out loud, they clearly share that view and are salivating for the moment the Voting Rights Act falls at the Supreme Court.
I am sure they are dusting off the literacy tests.
This is a good point.
In 2027, the faces will have control again and will make the heels pay.
Tex-ass sealed the fate of the repukes.
True, but in this case, the heels have made their bed.Oh. Something else I would add @ColdHardTruth.
Whether a particular performer is a face or a heel can change at the whim of the show runners. Also, their status as face or heel is very often a matter of perspective anyway, in the environment of anti-heroes.
True, but in this case, the heels have made their bed.
They will get taken down for it.
I am fairly sure. The GQP went way WAY too far.I'm not sure that's up to the performers in all cases.
I am fairly sure. The GQP went way WAY too far.
They will pay for that.
Perhaps, but what the GQP has done is way beyond escalation.Escalation is part of the show.
Would you be down with using algorithms to draw districts that balance them for fair representation of everybody?Any political party that has drawn up voting districts like the ones in Illinois, really has no room to bitch.
Would you be down with using algorithms to draw districts that balance them for fair representation of everybody?
Would you be down with using algorithms to draw districts that balance them for fair representation of everybody?
Is it that hard to understand?When would I get represented? "Everybody" isn't limited to Democrats and Republicans.
What have they ever really paid for? They do it because they know they will get away with it.I am fairly sure. The GQP went way WAY too far.
They will pay for that.
Is it that hard to understand?
You can look it up like I did.
Or you can refuse because you think the minority should set the rules for the majority.
Or that politicians should be able to game the system to defy the will of the of the voters.
The Founders established the electoral college to prevent high populations states from lording it over the less populated ones.
They certainly never intended for the low population states to lord it over the high population ones.
I am a “practical anarchist” as in we should be striving to not need a ruler at all, someday.
Should my extreme minority position be given the same weight as millions?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?