the Supreme Court is not supreme with me and millions of Americans..

[narrowroad]

the poll is this:

Do You agree or not w/ the following:

I never realized how BAD a lot of past Sup Ct decisions were until i read the book Courting Disaster

Essentially, the Court has been ruling for the minority against the majority. they have been making up laws, which is NOT their job. They are only ONE branch of our shared-power system, not 2 or 3 out of 3.

They REALLY blew it in 1973 with the atrocious, monstrous, anti-American Roe v Wade..

Then, just when we thought things couldn't get worse, they DIDN't take the case involving egregious acts of voter fraud: criminals violating all kinds of laws and state and US Constitution to get a candidate elected that the Americn people did NOT want.

sickening....

Maybe the Sup Ct needs to be dissolved.

 

[MamboDervish]

They REALLY blew it in 1973 with the atrocious, monstrous, anti-American Roe v Wade..

Nothing could be more American than Roe v. Wade.

 

[j brown's body]

Well, it been in Republican hands for at least 30 years and looks like it will continue to be for another 30 years. One party rule is never good.

 

[PeacefulWarrior]

Awwww, poor guy.

 

[watsup]

the poll is this:

Do You agree or not w/ the following:

I never realized how BAD a lot of past Sup Ct decisions were until i read the book Courting Disaster

Essentially, the Court has been ruling for the minority against the majority. they have been making up laws, which is NOT their job. They are only ONE branch of our shared-power system, not 2 or 3 out of 3.

They REALLY blew it in 1973 with the atrocious, monstrous, anti-American Roe v Wade..

Then, just when we thought things couldn't get worse, they DIDN't take the case involving egregious acts of voter fraud: criminals violating all kinds of laws and state and US Constitution to get a candidate elected that the Americn people did NOT want.

sickening....

Maybe the Sup Ct needs to be dissolved.

I imagine that you also hate the school desegregation ruling and all the other civil rights rulings, too, right?

 

[Chomsky]

the poll is this:

Do You agree or not w/ the following:

I never realized how BAD a lot of past Sup Ct decisions were until i read the book Courting Disaster

Essentially, the Court has been ruling for the minority against the majority. they have been making up laws, which is NOT their job. They are only ONE branch of our shared-power system, not 2 or 3 out of 3.

They REALLY blew it in 1973 with the atrocious, monstrous, anti-American Roe v Wade..

Then, just when we thought things couldn't get worse, they DIDN't take the case involving egregious acts of voter fraud: criminals violating all kinds of laws and state and US Constitution to get a candidate elected that the Americn people did NOT want.

sickening....

Maybe the Sup Ct needs to be dissolved.

Hey, you win some, you lose some. The important thing is, you abide by it.

 

[lemmiwinx]

You think any of the Supremes care what you think? Hello! Lifetime appointments lol! They don't care what anybody else thinks, especially you.

 

[brianpatrick]

“Hey, you know what we should do?” he said.

“what should we do?” said I.

“we should get a bunch of patriots together and...”

 

[Bum]

the poll is this:

Do You agree or not w/ the following:

I never realized how BAD a lot of past Sup Ct decisions were until i read the book Courting Disaster

Essentially, the Court has been ruling for the minority against the majority. they have been making up laws, which is NOT their job. They are only ONE branch of our shared-power system, not 2 or 3 out of 3.

They REALLY blew it in 1973 with the atrocious, monstrous, anti-American Roe v Wade..

Then, just when we thought things couldn't get worse, they DIDN't take the case involving egregious acts of voter fraud: criminals violating all kinds of laws and state and US Constitution to get a candidate elected that the Americn people did NOT want.

sickening....

Maybe the Sup Ct needs to be dissolved.

I think you are in for a lifetime of disappointment.

 

[Rexedgar]

Hey, you win some, you lose some. The important thing is, you abide by it.

Such a quaint notion, lately.....

 

[AGENT J]

the poll is this:

Do You agree or not w/ the following:

I never realized how BAD a lot of past Sup Ct decisions were until i read the book Courting Disaster

Essentially, the Court has been ruling for the minority against the majority. they have been making up laws, which is NOT their job. They are only ONE branch of our shared-power system, not 2 or 3 out of 3.

They REALLY blew it in 1973 with the atrocious, monstrous, anti-American Roe v Wade..

Then, just when we thought things couldn't get worse, they DIDN't take the case involving egregious acts of voter fraud: criminals violating all kinds of laws and state and US Constitution to get a candidate elected that the Americn people did NOT want.

sickening....

Maybe the Sup Ct needs to be dissolved.

So basically you posted that big long meltdown post just to try and hid an abortion post in polls

and who says "Sup Ct" when you can just say SCOTUS??? LMAO

Also RvW is one of th most american rulings.

it protects womans rights and YOU get to do what you want within limits and Others get to do what they want within limits

 

[upsideguy]

the poll is this:

Do You agree or not w/ the following:

I never realized how BAD a lot of past Sup Ct decisions were until i read the book Courting Disaster

Essentially, the Court has been ruling for the minority against the majority. they have been making up laws, which is NOT their job. They are only ONE branch of our shared-power system, not 2 or 3 out of 3.

They REALLY blew it in 1973 with the atrocious, monstrous, anti-American Roe v Wade..

Then, just when we thought things couldn't get worse, they DIDN't take the case involving egregious acts of voter fraud: criminals violating all kinds of laws and state and US Constitution to get a candidate elected that the Americn people did NOT want.

sickening....

Maybe the Sup Ct needs to be dissolved.

One of the main functions of the court is to protect the minorities from the tyranny of the majority. The majority is well represented by the legislative and executive branches. The courts protect against there over reach.

BTW, there were NO egregious cases of voter fraud, nor is such the domain of the SCOTUS. Elections are administered by individual states. In spite of numerous challenges at the state level, no one brought any compelling evidence of voter fraud before them. You do realize the allegations of voter fraud actually a rouse. Interesting that you got suckered in. You need to get a hold of yourself on this issue as you are letting you panties get all bunched up on something that isn't even true.

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

Perhaps a refresher course in civics at your local community college is in order as your frustrations seem to be tied to a lack of understanding of how this is all suppose to work.

 

[Chomsky]

Such a quaint notion, lately.....

There's only one thing that binds us together, as Americans. That little piece of paper from 1787 . . .

 

[upsideguy]

There's only one thing that binds us together, as Americans. That little piece of paper from 1787 . . .

Amen, Brother!

 

[BahamaBob]

Nothing could be more American than Roe v. Wade.

Murdering babies is American?

 

[Chomsky]

Amen, Brother!

 

[Rexedgar]

There's only one thing that binds us together, as Americans. That little piece of paper from 1787 . . .

I wish I shared your faith in a piece of paper........

 

[Chomsky]

I wish I shared your faith in a piece of paper........

There's no faith in that paper. It's the faith (in it) of the People, that counts! And yeah, there seems to have been some recent slippage in that. But we've been here before. And, it still doesn't detract from the factuality of my statement: That paper all that holds us together . . .

 

[joko104]

the poll is this:

Do You agree or not w/ the following:

I never realized how BAD a lot of past Sup Ct decisions were until i read the book Courting Disaster

Essentially, the Court has been ruling for the minority against the majority. they have been making up laws, which is NOT their job. They are only ONE branch of our shared-power system, not 2 or 3 out of 3.

They REALLY blew it in 1973 with the atrocious, monstrous, anti-American Roe v Wade..

Then, just when we thought things couldn't get worse, they DIDN't take the case involving egregious acts of voter fraud: criminals violating all kinds of laws and state and US Constitution to get a candidate elected that the Americn people did NOT want.

sickening....

Maybe the Sup Ct needs to be dissolved.

In the Mulberry ruling in the late 1700s, the Supreme Court ruled that the American Revolutionary War was all wrong, declared that the USA would be governed by British common law, not the Constitution - and this declared they had 100% absolute totalitarian power over everything and everyone subject to their personal opinions. In this, everyone in and out of government are their subject under their total control - including all elected officials, Congress and the President.

 

[AGENT J]

Murdering babies is American?

LMAO Who mentioned murdering babies?

 

[MamboDervish]

Murdering babies is American?

No. Freedom of choice certainly is. Women having autonomy over their own bodies is very much American, having been so for several generations now.
And aborting fetuses has certainly been divinely sanctioned since the inception of mankind - as the millions upon millions of miscarriages throughout history would attest.

Of course, some people would argue that murdering babies is something Americans only do on other people's soil. But that's for an entirely different discussion.

 

[Rexedgar]

There's no faith in that paper. It's the faith (in it) of the People, that counts! And yeah, there seems to have been some recent slippage in that. But we've been here before. And, it still doesn't detract from the factuality of my statement: That paper all that holds us together . . .

The last time “we were here,” there were, at least, geographical boundaries.

 

[Chomsky]

The last time “we were here,” there were, at least, geographical boundaries.

Eh, I dunno'. We were getting there, to a point, in the sixties.

If you've got some time, you may take an interest in these, below. If I get time, I may start a thread on them.

When the Left Attacked the Capitol

Fifty years ago, extremists bombed the seat of American democracy to end a war and start a revolution. It did neither, but it may have helped bring down a president.

www.politico.com

Opinion | I Was Part of the Weather Underground. Violence Is Not the Answer. (Published 2020)

Fifty years ago, a deadly explosion in Greenwich Village forced me to confront our warped sense of morality.

www.nytimes.com

 

[AJG]

Then, just when we thought things couldn't get worse, they DIDN't take the case involving egregious acts of voter fraud: criminals violating all kinds of laws and state and US Constitution to get a candidate elected that the Americn people did NOT want.

To be fair, practically no judges in the lower level courts took the election fraud nonsense seriously either. Even if you had your wish and the Supreme court was dissolved the outcome of the election would have been the same.

 

[bomberfox]

the poll is this:

Do You agree or not w/ the following:

I never realized how BAD a lot of past Sup Ct decisions were until i read the book Courting Disaster

Essentially, the Court has been ruling for the minority against the majority. they have been making up laws, which is NOT their job. They are only ONE branch of our shared-power system, not 2 or 3 out of 3.

They REALLY blew it in 1973 with the atrocious, monstrous, anti-American Roe v Wade..

Then, just when we thought things couldn't get worse, they DIDN't take the case involving egregious acts of voter fraud: criminals violating all kinds of laws and state and US Constitution to get a candidate elected that the Americn people did NOT want.

sickening....

Maybe the Sup Ct needs to be dissolved.

Lol. It is what it is. Dont see you bitching about Roberts defanging the voting rights act which enabled the disenfranchisement of minorities.