- Joined
- Mar 6, 2019
- Messages
- 25,766
- Reaction score
- 23,378
- Location
- PNW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
It wasn't given any scrutiny. It was dismissed out of hand. Again, why the SCOTUS majority is in such disrepute.I'm aware of OSHA's argument. I'm aware also that it failed to hold up under scrutiny
I'll ask, seriously, how you make a distinction that isn't there? If the danger to patients is patent regarding healthcare, how is it not in regards to coworkers and customers?
Does the per curiam opinion follow the law, as written? No it does not. Does it make a distinction not in the law? Yes, it does. It is purely ideological, not rational, and not based upon the law or Constitution. That's called "judicial activism".